Freedom Forever

#medicalfreedom #religiousfreedom

[Freedom Forever @323Blu]

@Alecaticus But why should she have to? She should have to go into her own pocket to pay for a rental because her Audi needs work & she doesn’t want to surveilled?

[Freedom Forever @323Blu]

@epaleezeldin @johnrich It would be nice to see @epaleezeldin bring this same energy regarding chem trails! Stop spraying our skies, ruining the land and poisoning everything! This was part of your campaign & it’s been crickets ever since!

[Secretary Brooke Rollins @SecRollins]

Another day, another ridiculous battle to destroy our farmers and their farmland.

New York’s decision to craft their own lax standards for ‘prime farmland’ to fast-track solar developments is a direct attack on American agriculture. In 2020, the exact year they stood up their Office of Renewable Energy Siting, they worked with @Cornell to downgrade soils that were long considered prime. This wasn’t an accident. It was engineered to fast-track solar projects on our best farmland.

For our farmers and ranchers, land is far more than acreage on a map. It is the ground that holds a family’s history. It is a generational heritage and legacy.

Our great ranchers and farmers feed this nation — we cannot allow prime soils to be paved over for unreliable energy that displaces our producers. Farm security is national security. @USDA stands with American agriculture, not green new deal mandates that sacrifice our farmland.

Thanks @johnrich for bringing this to our attention! We are on it.

[John Rich🇺🇸 @johnrich]

There's a 911 in Upstate New York!! Ain't that right @GovKathyHochul ?? Kathy, why do you hate Upstate farmers so much? Let's see what America has to say about this, shall we? If you stand with American Farmers, hit REPOST. Volume UP!👇

[ELIZABETH LANE @imelizabethlane]

I’m going to be blunt. I’ve reached the point where I find Erika Kirk deeply disturbing, not because of rumors or gossip, but because of consistent, observable patterns of behavior. To be clear, everything I say in this post is my opinion, I’m not claiming this is a fact I’m saying this is what I think Erica Kirk is.

I come from the world of acting and modeling. I’ve spent years around social climbers, opportunists, image-curators, and people who treat relationships as ladders, that is why I left that world. Most of these people are shallow and harmless. A few are dangerous. Erika falls into the latter category not because she is just ambitious, but because of how calculated and performative her ambition appears to be. I believe she maybe a psychopath.

What stands out immediately is the reaction she provokes in people, which is very common with psychopaths. Across the board including from people who support her publicly, the private reaction is the same: “I can’t watch her.” Not criticism, just physical discomfort. People turn off interviews because the presentation feels artificial to the point of being unbearable. let me explain:

That kind of response does not happen accidentally, and it does not happen often. Research in psychology shows that humans are highly sensitive to emotional incongruence, mismatches between facial expression, tone, and content. When affect appears simulated rather than genuine, the brain registers it as a threat signal. This activates discomfort and avoidance, even if the person cannot consciously explain why. So many of us felt this way but we could not explain why we could not watch her.

Studies on psychopathy, particularly those building on the work of psychologists like Robert Hare, describe traits such as rehearsed emotional display, and shallow affect. These traits can create what observers experience as an “uncanny” interpersonal dynamic. The discomfort arises and people want to shut it off because most people rarely encounter extreme affective mimicry in everyday life, so the brain struggles to categorize what it is detecting. (Comment below if this is what you felt like when watching her.)

Erica is attractive enough, and she had every tool in her position to sell this organically except for one thing - emotion. The entire story of what happened could have helped her sell this fully, she really would have been the last person on earth to be a suspect, if not for the FBI’s terrible mistakes, TPUSA’s lies, and her very fake performance.

Plenty of attractive, ambitious women move through media spaces without triggering that response, even though we know what they are. This is about something else, an extreme disconnect between presentation she puts out and perceived authenticity.

Erica is not the archetype of a model/actress seeking money and fame and then settling into a quiet life with a wealthy good looking husband. She’s the wolf type. Who wants to be in the place of that husband.She is not born for a supporting role, she’s a decision-maker type. She appears to pursue proximity to power, moving fluidly between television, nonprofits, branding opportunities, and ideological spaces that maximize exposure.

Her previous partners are guys women like her would date, muscular, jacked, good-looking. Even though they are not people with huge potential, they are all somewhat established. They are good stepping stones until the right person shows up. Now, looking at her previous partners, I’d say Charlie probably was not her type visually, but he was exactly what she was looking for in a man - potential to be a great power.

What Erica was looking for is the same thing Hillary Clinton was looking for when she met Bill. She recognized that Bill Clinton was her ticket to power, the power she could control and she was right. She realized she could create a great brand out of him and herself, and they still are a brand. The Clintons. No one in this world can say they love each other. They are a brand that works. This is why she’s sticking around despite Epstein and Lewinsky. Also, if you think Bill is the decision-maker there, you must have never been in close proximity to the Clintons. She moves the game, she is the decision-maker.

Erica saw a brand with Charlie. She also saw that Charlie could one day become President of the United States if he wanted to. Charlie had the ear of the most powerful segment of any society - students! He was going to be a very important player in politics, and she was not missing that ride.

What’s striking is how completely her public identity reshapes itself after that relationship begins. The aesthetic, the tone, the values, the presentation all change. Overnight, the persona shifts into the role that best fits Charlie’s world, devoted Christian, modest, supportive housewife. That kind of rapid adaptation is quite impressive for a usual person but not for a psychopath, they do it all the time.

In my head story goes like this: For a moment, it works. She becomes the wife of a rising political figure with access to donors, institutions, and national platforms. At that point, the ceiling isn’t social media influence, it’s empire-building, foundations, global reach, a legacy brand - Kirks!

It’s obvious that Charlie listens to her, whether it’s about donors or the trajectory of TPUSA. The most influential figure in any mentally healthy man’s life is his wife. She is going to be the biggest influence, and that’s just how it is. That is why you need to pick you partner wisely!

Everything was going well until Charlie makes decisions based on conscience rather than expansion and money. He turns down money. He refuses to play dirty politics. I’m assuming someone like Erica who married into this because she had a vision for this brand would not be very happy that. The life she appears to have signed up for - power couple, expanding influence, historical relevance, was collapsing into something else entirely, domesticity, housewife kids and now Charlie's refusing to accept the money that can make him a global power. A supporting role instead of center stage is not her thing.

Her husband died a few days ago, and she walks onto the stage as if she were born there. It comes naturally to her, she knows it, and she wants it. Just days after her husband’s death, she was already laying out ambitious plans for the company over Zoom. It’s obvious she was always deeply involved in the business and knew exactly where to pick up when her turn came.

What people struggle to watch, what makes the screen unbearable, is not grief. It’s the absence of emotional continuity. Performances can be learned, trust me, as a former actress I can speak to that, but emotion can’t be improvised or mimicked if you’ve never experienced it. That’s why I think we are dealing with a psychopath who has never really experienced these emotions and does not know how to play them. And audiences feel it instantly. It’s fake. Again just my opinion.

This isn’t an accusation of crime, I’m not claiming this is what happened and it's a fact. It’s an analysis I made after watching her long enough. And quite honestly I am sick of this shit.

[The HighWire @HighWireTalk]

🚨 285 times more stillbirths. Read that again.

Researchers went into VAERS and analyzed pregnancy-related reports tied to the Tdap vaccine in pregnant women. What they found should be front-page news on every outlet in America.

🛑Stillbirth signal: reporting odds ratio of 285.77. Pre-term delivery: 196.8. Fetal death: 140.83.

That's 285 TIMES more stillbirth reports. 196.8 TIMES more pre-term delivery reports. 140 TIMES more fetal death reports.

A reporting odds ratio of 2 is considered a signal worth investigating. This is 285. And the corporate media's response? Mother Jones is already running cover, framing the story as a plan to use AI tools to mine what they are calling "unverified vaccine injury claims."

Unverified. That is the word they chose.

Here is what is verified. The system that is supposed to protect pregnant women and their unborn children works like this: test the vaccine poorly, approve it, inject it into the population, and let VAERS catch the carnage.
The people are the fourth phase of testing. The final phase of testing. And VAERS chronically underreports. Everyone in this field knows that.

So what we are actually looking at here is the floor. Not the ceiling.

The researchers who found these signals are not even calling for the vaccine to be pulled. They are asking for active surveillance studies. Now. Immediately. That is the bare minimum. That is the lowest possible bar.

And we are still waiting.

[Power to the People ☭🕊 @ProudSocialist]

The whole clip is even more damning.

Les Wexner was exposing that Epstein worked for the Rothschild family, Jeff Bezos & founders of Google.

That’s when his lawyer intervened: "I will f*cking kiII you if you answer another question w/ more than 5 words.

[Del Bigtree @delbigtree]

One in 12.5 boys in California now has autism. ONE IN TWELVE.

Remember when RAIN MAN was a HIT? Because NO ONE had ever seen anything like that character before. I didn't know a SINGLE kid with autism in my entire school. Neither did you.

The psychiatric giants, Charcot, Tourette, Freud, walked through insane asylums and documented EVERYTHING. Schizophrenia. OCD. Every disorder known to man.

NOT ONE description of autism. Not one repetitive motion disorder. ZERO.

And Bobby Kennedy asks the question nobody in public health will answer:

👉 WHERE ARE THE 70-YEAR-OLD MEN WITH AUTISM?

If this is just "better diagnosis," every nursing home in America should be FULL of them. Go look. I'll wait.

This isn't a diagnosis crisis. This is a CAUSATION crisis and they don't want you asking why.

[The HighWire @HighWireTalk]

🚨ICYMI: Blindness is now the #2 reason people are suing Ozempic and Wegovy manufacturers.

A federal panel of judges has centralized litigation against GLP-1 drug makers over a condition called NAION, a form of sudden blindness now ranking as the second-highest category of lawsuits against these companies. The only thing generating MORE lawsuits? Stomach paralysis.

And 1 in 8 American adults is currently taking one of these drugs.

The studies are alarming. One analysis of 139,000 patients found GLP-1 users were twice as likely to develop a severe form of macular degeneration.

Another found users were 68.6 times more likely to develop NAION than those on alternative medications.

The study that tried to soften those findings? It listed over 70 pharmaceutical companies in its conflict of interest disclosure. Novo Nordisk. Eli Lilly. Pfizer. AstraZeneca. All of them.

And beyond the eyes, 22% of users develop nutritional deficiencies within a year. Two-thirds of the weight returns after stopping. Hair loss. Fatigue. Depression. Anxiety. Possible thyroid tumors. Suicidal ideation.

The FDA keeps approving more. Prices are being lowered to expand access. Pharma is racing for market share.

👉 Read the full report: https://t.co/AgBND7Scv9

[The HighWire @HighWireTalk]

🚨 MODERNA CEO AT DAVOS: NO GOVERNMENT MANDATES = NO NEW VACCINES 🚨

Big Pharma just admitted what we've been screaming for years: Their entire business model depends on forced uptake through government recommendations and mandates... Not on safety, efficacy, or voluntary choice.

Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel, speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos last week (Jan 22, 2026), was asked if RFK Jr.'s HHS reforms cutting vaccine mandates and recommendations would hurt their business.
His response? "Oh 100%." 💥

He told investors publicly: Moderna does NOT foresee investing in ANY new Phase 3 vaccine trials in the foreseeable future.

Why? "You cannot make a return on investment if you don't have access to the U.S. market... your market is much smaller because you don't have a recommendation by the government."

Translation: Without the government forcing billions of doses via mandates, bulk purchases, and universal recommendations, even basic safety trials using real placebos become "too expensive." They won't bother developing new vaccines unless they can count on coercion to guarantee massive sales.

We're just asking for placebo-controlled trials to prove real safety and quality, something every real medicine requires. But Bancel says: If you demand that, and don't force it on Americans, there's no way to make money.

This confirms what we already suspected. The mRNA is built on emergency authorizations, mandates, and taxpayer-funded coercion. Strip away government force and the pipeline suddenly "dries up."

Watch the full video breakdown right here—straight from the CEO's mouth, no spin needed.

[Freedom Forever @323Blu]

@megynkelly It all seems so fake- how are you going along with this?

[E @ElijahSchaffer]

This interview was 48 hrs after the Hamptons meeting with Bill Ackman

If ackman wasn’t pressuring Charlie, then someone else clearly was

I think they are lying to us and our witnesses are more valid than the ackman apologists that have me blocked

[Mel @Villgecrazylady]

Bill Ackman just confirmed he hosted his meeting with Charlie on August 4th and 5th.

Here’s Charlie talking to Megyn Kelly the very next day on August 6th.

Now how do you think that meeting went down?

[Turning Point USA @TPUSA]

A Life of Faith, A Legacy That Endures: Remembering Charlie Kirk

[Jack @jackunheard]

Tyler Robinson and Thomas Matthew Crooks.

Two products of the Media.

When will this end?

[Robby Starbuck @robbystarbuck]

Some activist media are freaking out over this because they know how bad it looks for Kamala. They’re going to lie and say she was responding to someone else but here’s a new video where you see she’s responding to "Jesus is Lord". The video says everything that needs to be said.

[Defiant L’s @DefiantLs]

Man reacts to video of Kamala Harris saying "you're at the wrong rally" after someone allegedly shouted "Jesus is Lord"

"If you vote for her as a Christian, your religious beliefs are on the line."

[Gina Carano 🕯 @ginacarano]

Truly interesting conversation by two very curious fascinating minds.
I’d say a 👉 must watch.

[Children’s Health Defense @ChildrensHD]

When Tennessee State Rep. Monty Fritts proposed a bill to ban geoengineering activity within and over the state, he expected to meet some controversy — but not open mockery on the House floor.