This picture is not from October 7, 2023.
This picture is from today, July 24, 2026.
A Muslim Palestinian sheikh from Samaria murdering two Jews.
Believing you can make peace with these savages is utter madness.
SAN DIEGO COUNTY:
Talking about our CALIFORDABLE plan but there's a massive issue people here are focused on: the release of Sexual Violent Predators into the community. More in San Diego than any other county.
Enough Is Enough. As governor I will stop this insanity.
These men gang-raped a 16-year old girl for TWO DAYS.
They should be PUBLICLY HANGED.
Instead a woman insults them and SHE is punished WHILE THEY GO FREE.
THESE JUDGES AND COURTS ARE UNIMAGINABLY EVIL.
For those that don't know...
The man that Shiloh was convicted of being "disorderly" against was himself charged for r*ping a 16 year-old-girl WITH ANOTHER MAN and TRAPPING HER IN A TRAILER, dehydrated and without food.
The charges were dropped, "in the interest of justice..."
🚨 HOLY CRAP! President Trump posted this MIC DROP from an Iranian woman who destroyed the leftists
"You're sitting there on your cushy couch talking about Kamala Harris. You claim to be a FEMINIST, you claim to be a humanitarian. Where ARE YOU when the women need you? You are a fake, you are a hypocrite, you have no help to anyone!"
"So if you claim to be a feminist, you claim to be a humanitarian, you claim to be a good person!"
"America, Iran isn't just a military war or peace in the Middle East or oil stabilization. This is a humanitarian issue. They are killing young people every single day. And the only president, the only one that has helped is President Trump!"
🔥🔥🇺🇸🇮🇷
THE SALUTE THREAD: A FIELD GUIDE TO EVERY LOGICAL FALLACY COMMITTED IN A SINGLE COMMENT SECTION
I want to thank an entire comment section today for volunteering, free of charge, to be a live demonstration of nearly every logical fallacy in the book. Consider this my grading rubric. Bring a pen.
The underlying fact, for anyone just joining us: 36 U.S. Code § 301(b) states that "members of the Armed Forces and veterans who are present but not in uniform may render the military salute in the manner provided for individuals in uniform." Trump is Commander-in-Chief under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution. That is the statute. I did not write it, Congress did, and I simply read it, which today apparently makes me the only one.
Now, let's go person by person, because everyone deserves individual attention, and because half of you clearly did not get any in school.
— @rmacgeorge —
Your entire contribution to this exchange was "you don't salute during anthems, fake account," followed later by "it's not my opinion, lol," followed by absolutely nothing resembling a source. That, friend, is circulus in demonstrando, a circular argument, where the conclusion IS the premise. You are essentially saying, "It's true because I said it's true, and I said it's true because it's true." I gave you a federal statute. You gave me the debate equivalent of stomping your foot. Repeating "ridiculous" over and over is not a rebuttal, it is argumentum ad nauseam, the fallacy of trying to win by sheer repetition and exhaustion rather than evidence. And calling me "fake account" instead of addressing the actual text of the law is a textbook argumentum ad hominem, attacking the messenger because you have nothing for the message. You are a hard dog to keep on the porch when it comes to admitting you were wrong, but an easy one to send home with your tail between your legs.
— @Doxy6661 —
Once the statute was on the table and you had nothing left to argue with, you pivoted entirely to demanding I post my old military assignment orders publicly on X. That is a red herring, a deliberate change of subject designed to drag the conversation away from the point you were losing. It is also, in a delicious twist, argumentum ad ignorantiam, assuming that because I would not hand over sensitive personnel documents on the open internet, that must mean I am lying, rather than, say, that I understand what DoDI 5200.48 and UCMJ Article 92 actually are. You demanded proof of something completely irrelevant to whether Trump can legally salute, and when I correctly declined for operational security reasons, you treated my restraint as a confession. That is not a gotcha, that is you being about as useful as a screen door on a submarine. And since you insisted on dragging the Iraqi general into this, here is your answer since you clearly wanted one so badly: yes, I saluted him, because AR 600-25 requires the salute to be rendered to officers of friendly foreign nations when recognized as such. That is not a scandal, that is the regulation functioning exactly as written, the same way 36 U.S. Code § 301 functions exactly as written for the Commander-in-Chief. It is almost like regulations mean something when you actually read them instead of guessing.
— @justicenow_alan —
You quoted subsection (C) of 36 U.S. Code § 301 at length, and I will give you credit, you can copy and paste. What you conveniently left out, however, was subsection (B), sitting right above it, which covers members of the Armed Forces AND veterans not in uniform. That is called suppressed evidence, or cherry-picking, presenting only the portion of a source that supports your point while hiding the portion that destroys it. It is intellectually dishonest at best and a straw man at worst, because you are arguing against a version of my point that conveniently ignores half the statute. Then, when called on it, your closer was "typical ignorant BS," which is just argumentum ad hominem wearing a trench coat. You have delusions of adequacy, my friend, and the footnotes prove it.
— @Alexoo4 —
"Commanders in Chief do not salute during the national anthem goofball" is a dicto simpliciter, a sweeping generalization asserted as an absolute rule with zero supporting citation, zero nuance, and zero acknowledgment that photographs exist of multiple past presidents doing exactly that. You stated a universal rule off the top of your head and expected it to be treated as settled law. It is not. It is vibes. If brains were dynamite, that post would not have been enough to blow out a birthday candle.
— @bdavisauthor —
Mocking my bio credentials with "I assumed RET meant retired, now I see it's short for something else" instead of engaging with the actual legal argument is a non sequitur wrapped around an ad hominem, a two-for-one special. My military record has exactly nothing to do with whether subsection (B) of the U.S. Code applies to the Commander-in-Chief. Attacking the source instead of the argument is what you do when the argument itself is unwinnable. I responded with the citation again, without the insult, because that is what using actual sources looks like, and it apparently confused you.
— @GXWash —
"No president has ever saluted the National Anthem as far as I can remember" is argumentum ad ignorantiam dressed up as a personal recollection, treating the limits of your own memory as though they were the limits of recorded history. It is also just factually wrong, since photographs exist of Reagan, Obama, and Biden all doing precisely this. "As far as I can remember" is not a legal standard, it is a shrug with a keyboard attached.
— @KikiElephants —
You opened this whole exchange by calling a combat veteran a "daft dodging coward and an idiot" for saluting his own flag. That is argumentum ad hominem stacked directly on top of a factual error, since the flag did not salute Trump, Trump saluted the flag, as Commander-in-Chief, per the same statute everyone else in this thread also failed to read. Then, when I asked whether men get to invoke "my body, my choice" for the draft, your response was "Trump certainly did," which is a tu quoque that actually boomerangs on your own argument, because you are simultaneously calling him a coward for avoiding service AND admitting the very bodily autonomy argument the left insists applies to everything else. Pick a lane.
Here is Quinn's Law playing out in real time across seven different accounts: the left does not need to win an argument, they only need to feel like they won, facts entirely optional. Every single reply above, independently, without coordination, proved that law correct.
Now, before I close, let's give credit where it's due, because not everyone in this thread was busy failing eighth grade civics in real time.
@kniftarqr9y saw exactly what was happening and said it plainly: I should not have had to defend basic statutory reading "to the great uneducated." Correct. I should not have had to. But here we are.
@roz28755 watched me lay out subsection (B) and simply said "Touché, AGAIN," recognizing a citation when he saw one, which by this point in the thread apparently qualified as a rare skill.
@CWilltherealist summed up the entire underlying condition of this comment section in seven words: "leftist brain rot is a parasitic disease." Blunt, accurate, and honestly more efficient than my entire article.
And @Spence25S, once justicenow_alan tried the cherry-picked subsection (C) routine, wasn't fooled for a second and called it exactly what it was. Good eye. It is nice to know someone in the replies still has one.
To the four of you, thank you for doing what an actual debate is supposed to look like: reading the material, weighing the evidence, and reaching a conclusion instead of just repeating a feeling louder.
I served. I know military custom and courtesy from the inside, not from a meme account. But please, continue explaining the flag code to the combat medic. I am sure the next reply will finally be the one with an actual citation in it.
But what do I know, I am only a medically retired combat medic who actually reads the statutes before arguing about them.
#MAGA #Veterans #Trump
@JoJoFromJerz@atrupar@TPUSA
They turned NYC into a shithole.
Look at this video.
Graffiti covering every storefront, streets full of trash and loiterers, halal trucks and third-world crowds taking over what used to be the greatest city on Earth.
This is what Democrat policies and mass invasion have done.
They’re doing it to every major city in America and the West.
Without real REMIGRATION, not the fake shit they’re talking about, this becomes the new normal everywhere.
This is pure savagery.
One hospital in Afghanistan under Sharia Law:
42 underage girls gave birth in the first five months of this year.
Six already on their second pregnancy.
Five ectopic.
Two mothers dead.
A two month old baby girl promised for marriage the day she turns seven.
This is what radical Islam does to little girls.
This is the culture Democrats and open border globalists want to import into America by the millions.
We either stop this barbarism at the border or we watch it destroy our daughters too.
Here is Thomas Massie with Ro Khanna accepting the Quincy award from Trita Parsi who is a Swedish national and a long time Iranian lobbyist, at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft which is funded by George Soros and Charles Koch.
He boasted on Social Media how proud he is to accept this award from this Soros-funded NGO.
Tell me again, how this guy is not a Democrat?
Paper ballots are the smartest, safest way to ensure your vote is secure against attacks by foreign actors. Russia can’t hack a piece of paper like they can a computer. We introduced the Secure Elections Act to ensure our elections are safeguarded. We must be ready.
RFK Jr: "We've recently uncovered that more than 36,000 doctors had their Medicare reimbursements altered based upon childhood vaccination rates. That's not medicine. That's coercion."
This guy was told "It’s just property." Even with clear security camera footage, Columbus Police allegedly told a resident they can't act against driveway thieves unless a gun is pulled on you. Neighbors are completely fed up with the lack of accountability for property crime.
According to the CIA, China levied tariffs on conservative dominated parts of the United States to cause economic distress which would undermine the President and make Representatives lobby him for what China wants.
🚨 WATCH: In an emotional video, a young Iranian who barely made it across the border into Turkey has delivered a gut-wrenching eyewitness account that's sending shockwaves worldwide.
He says the outside world has no real grasp of the horror unfolding inside Iran right now.
This isn't about arrests.
This isn't about beatings.
This is about deliberate killings—cold, calculated executions on the streets.
Protesters are being shot straight in the chest, point-blank.
No warning shots.
No stray bullets.
No accidents.
Over and over again, with lethal intent. The death tolls trickling out online? According to him, they're nowhere near the truth.
The real numbers are far higher—bodies vanish into mass graves, hospitals are raided to finish off the wounded, and corpses are stacked and hidden to erase the evidence.
Families are terrified into silence.
They beg for their loved ones' remains, sometimes forced to pay for the very bullets that killed them, then warned never to speak.
Fear seals every mouth.Inside Iran, people can't cry out without risking the same fate.
Outside, the world sees only fragments—filtered, delayed, minimized.
That enforced silence is the regime's most powerful weapon right now.
It lets the killing continue unchecked while the rest of the planet looks away.
The refugee's plea cuts through it: the scale of this bloodshed is being buried alive.
And until the world forces its eyes open, the true carnage stays hidden in the shadows.