Paul Watson

[James Melville 🚜 @JamesMelville]

Keir Starmer promised “change.” He delivered decline.

Pensioners lost their winter fuel payments in the middle of a cost-of-living crisis. Small businesses were hammered with tax rises. Farmers were punished. Net zero damaged economic and energy security. Welfare reforms targeted the disabled and vulnerable while the Labour government raised taxes and watched growth limp along. Starmer talked about fixing the NHS - yet waiting lists stayed high. The economy sputtered, government borrowing increased and ordinary families felt poorer, not better. On illegal migration, Starmer failed completely. Small boats kept arriving. Over 50,000 a year.

He had no vision. No story. No sense of direction. Just a lawyer’s skill at muddying the water dressed up as statesmanship. More in thrall to the Davos clique rather the connecting with the public mood.

Endless U-turns. Wooden, uninspiring, po-faced communication. Scandals over appointing Mandelson, his indulgence in freebies and donor influence that shattered the “transparent government” illusion he sold.

He governed like a man terrified of his own shadow — risk-averse, reactive, and utterly lacking the political antenna or leadership presence to unite a fractured country.

His approval ratings had collapsed to historic lows — net favourability around -46, among the worst for any modern Prime Minister. Local elections were a disaster for Labour. Cabinet ministers resigned. His own MPs openly plotted against him. He went from a landslide victory (in terms of parliamentary seats) to one of the most despised figures in recent British politics faster than almost anyone in living memory.

Starmer didn’t just underperform. He confirmed the worst fears of those who never trusted him: a blank, directionless technocrat who wanted power more than he knew what to do with it. He betrayed the mandate, broke umpteen manifesto pledges, betrayed the vulnerable, and left Britain more disillusioned than when he arrived.

That is his woeful record. And that is why there should be absolutely no sympathy for his resignation today.

[Paul Watson @38_paul]

Check out debbietitch's video! #TikTok https://t.co/KUNnCti4ow

[Paul Watson @38_paul]

https://t.co/Z0oa2oqe3G

[Paul Watson @38_paul]

https://t.co/vwFB3E1Xsg

[Priti Patel MP @pritipatel]

Enough of this shameful nonsense.

Labour supports giving children as young as 11 drugs to block puberty.

This child abuse will stop the natural development of children’s bodies through puberty.

This is an abhorrent practice and must stop.

Why wont Labour let children be children?

If like me you agree that this should be stopped, sign our petition below. ⬇️

https://t.co/5qGCTDaNlY

[Ant Middleton @antmiddleton]

Yes yes and yes! Our country, our flag, our way… 🫡🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

[Mr Dav X @MrDavX]

🇬🇧🚨 UK MP Sarah Pochin faces backlash after saying:
“Sharia law has no place in Britain” and calling for all Sharia courts to be shut down.

Do you support banning Sharia courts in the UK?

A. Yes
B. No

[Paul Watson @38_paul]

@MrDavX Yes we have UK law in this country.

[Paul Watson @38_paul]

Preston Davey deserved better. Demand a national inquiry - Sign the Petition! https://t.co/H9mnhmY3Th via @UKChange

[Truth matters @JMccartney89038]

Andy Burnham's not the answer.
The Labour Party simply has to be sent to the dustbin of history for Britain to have any hope.
Under Burnham, it will be business as usual with just a few policy changes and tweaking around the edges.
Some will stupidly fall for it.
The Islamic dinghies will still arrive.
The rapes and beheadings will continue.
The arrests for free speech will still happen.
The general Government authoritarianism and suppression will continue.

Nothing will change.

Same sh*t.
Different colour.

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

You might find it difficult to do two things at once, Paul, but I find it remarkably easy to enjoy the millions I've made while continuing to care about women's rights.

[Paul Watson @38_paul]

https://t.co/Q7cLw32ScU

[Chris Rose @ArchRose90]

Baroness Sayeeda Warsi, the former Tory chairman who called the party xenophobic and racist, has emerged as a front-runner to become Labour’s anti-Muslim hostility tsar.

We don’t need one at all. Especially one who brands any minor criticism of Islam as “racist”.

Dreadful.

[Paul Watson @38_paul]

https://t.co/JODK93agpQ

[Laurence Fox @LozzaFox]

Muslims should be barred from holding public office in the United kingdom.

Their allegiance is to Allah.

It is not to Britain.

[HJB News @HJB_News__]

Bristol’s Green Party led council told residents not to hang England flags on lampposts during the World Cup. Locals in Knowle West ignored them completely, covering streets and houses in flags everywhere. Well done and f_ck the Greens!

[Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 @TRobinsonNewEra]

WHAT KIND OF ANIMAL ATTEMPTS TO RAPE A VULNERABLE OLD LADY IN A CARE HOME?

Malek Alshabi a 53 year old Yemini was sentenced at Grimsby Crown Court on Thursday after admitting a charge of attempted rape.

Alshabi denied all allegations put to him during a police interview.

He has also been sentenced to 9 years imprisonment, and he could be out in half that time.

GET THESE ANIMALS OUT OF OUR COUNTRY!!!!

[John Cleese @JohnCleese]

Hooray !

[Peter Clack @PeterDClack]

The mainstream media and scientific bodies chose to ignore a climate declaration, signed by over 1,100 (and later, even more) scientists.

The 'World Climate Declaration' was published in September, 2019, by CLINTEL (Climate Intelligence), a Netherlands-based group. It argued there is no climate crisis or emergency and criticised overreliance on worst-case scenarios based on computer modelling.

The declaration pointed to empirical data of biomass expansion, noting that 'CO2 is plant food'—a reality now backed by verified NASA satellite data showing significant global greening over recent decades. They emphasised the biological benefits of CO2 for global greening, and argued that climate policies must respect economic realities and national sovereignty.

However, critics of this paper were more focussed on who signed it, saying only a small percentage were publishing climate scientists or paleoclimatologists. Many were engineers, geologists, or professionals from unrelated fields.

This was a collision between an entrenched, centrally coordinated climate machine and a bloc of independent professionals, drawn from engineering, economic and industrial backgrounds, arguing the practical, physical constraints and costs of such an all-encompassing global energy transition.

The declaration said climate models had serious flaws. But the climate campaigners were on a roll, and said they alone represented mainstream science. They had built a body of evidence on the calibrated data of satellite and ocean temperatures. The 'short-term pain of transitioning to net zero was preferable to the long-term instability and economic damage from uncontrolled climate change.

This posture allowed them to freely portray the 'rate of warming' as unprecedented in modern human history. The mainstream media backed them. The declaration was labeled 'fringe' overnight by major academic journals.

The economic fallout from dismantling the global energy infrastructure has in fact been colossal, now estimated at $275 trillion and counting. The 1,100 strong declaration did not break through into this entrenched policy circle because of its institutional barriers to outsiders. These doors were permanently closed.

The UN, major central banks and Western governments were already colluding clandestinely with each other, plus global asset managers like BlackRock and Vanguard. They owned the science. They owned the carbon cash fallout. Now they owned the sovereignty as well.

The climate narrative is high-stakes rhetoric, slick propaganda that downplays the gradual collapse of western economies, once based on cheap coal, oil and gas. This mainstream narrative is what captured the public's attention with its high-stakes rhetoric, bypassing the need for a professionally structured, data-driven approach that would be much harder for independent critics to dismiss.

The campaign was spearheaded by claims of 'global boiling' - 'code red for humanity' rhetoric filled the news pages and dominated politicised shouting matches. The UN and associated bodies shifted their position from 'advisory' scientific panels to becoming the world's global economic managers.

The conversation wasn't about atmospheric physics. It was about rusted-on, centralised, top-down control and ownership. But when policies move faster than engineering realities, like grid stability and battery storage limits, then economic hardship becomesss the inevitable price.

That is exactly how it has turned out.