Hamza Alami

@3Hamzaaa

You don’t need to have an opinion about everything 🙃

Joined April 2017

315 Following

688 Followers

1.3K Posts

Pinned Tweet

Hamza Alami @3Hamzaaa

over 6 years ago

A short note on the main differences between the 08-09 measures and the current ones and why this will unavoidably lead to inflation : https://t.co/SKLcx4AO2R

3Hamzaaa retweeted

Aziz Chérif Alami

@CedezaAziz

24 days ago

PAM, RNI, Istiqlal, PJD ...? A quoi bon On peut présenter 350 mesures dans un programme électoral. Mais l’Histoire économique pose une question beaucoup plus simple : avec quelle énergie allez-vous faire tourner le pays ? La révolution industrielle n’est pas née d’une liste de 350 réformes. Elle a été rendue possible par le charbon qui a alimenté la vapeur, puis les mines, les aciéries... Et autour de cette énergie est né tout un écosystème : ingénieurs, industriels, ouvriers qualifiés, infrastructures, capital. Le Maroc n’a pas d'énergie bon marché dans son sous sol. Mais on possède peut-être le charbon du XXIᵉ siècle : ☀️ énormément de soleil 🔋 des batteries dont le coût s’est effondré 🏭 et désormais la possibilité de construire une véritable industrie LFP et BESS sur notre propre sol. Alors que le gasoil est aujourd’hui autour de 15 DH/litre et va peut être encore augmenter, il faut dans cette campagne électorale leur demander : "Quel est votre plan concret pour faire du Maroc l’un des pays à l’énergie la moins chère du monde ?" Parce qu’un pays ne s’industrialise pas avec 350 mesurettes.

480

3Hamzaaa retweeted

Joe Weisenthal

@TheStalwart

2 months ago

Wow https://t.co/dS56VvcV0u

102

276K

3Hamzaaa retweeted

schmosby

@schmosby_xbt

2 months ago

theyr called memory stocks because you'll never forget the liquidations

246

128

133K

Who to follow

Nathan Conniry

@NathanConniry

https://t.co/FA3XZ2TAZa

Julie Wade

@julie_wade

J Auto Trading Strategies, LLC NinjaTrader Affiliate: https://t.co/QqpJqyOILy Disclosure: https://t.co/HR95gjFJO0

BVC_analyse

@BVCMAROC

Amateur d'analyse technique et fondamentale. Sur ce compte je présente mes visons personnelles #finance #stocks #crypto

Hamza Alami @3Hamzaaa

3 months ago

@Mehditons Dayet Aoua ? 🧐

3Hamzaaa retweeted

كأس العالم FIFA 🏆

@fifaworldcup_ar

3 months ago

أسود الأطلس لا يستسلمون 🦁 🇲🇦 #FIFAWorldCup

546

83K

3Hamzaaa retweeted

Lloyd's List @LloydsList

4 months ago

Vessels continued to enter and exit the Middle East Gulf on June 20, data from Lloyd's List Intelligence shows. Despite Iran claiming it was closing the strait, traffic was seen moving with AIS on via the northern route and also the southern route for the first time in weeks

990

409

207

492K

Hamza Alami @3Hamzaaa

4 months ago

@Kennyroyco Pas de réaction for now, les marchés sont plus inquiets par la hausse des taux que la guerre a ce point

3Hamzaaa retweeted

Not Jerome Powell

@alifarhat79

4 months ago

There’s a Trump tweet for everything

319

58K

3Hamzaaa retweeted

Jim Bianco

@biancoresearch

6 months ago

I am not a military analyst. I'm a financial analyst focused on macroeconomic risk. That different lens might explain why I see something most military strategists and investors are missing. --- The New Rules of Warfare—And Why We Can't Opt Out For nearly a century, warfare belonged to whoever controlled the biggest defense budget. Aircraft carriers. Stealth bombers. Multibillion-dollar weapons systems. That model is changing in ways many aren't appreciating. Ukraine and Iran are showing the West what 21st-century conflict actually looks like: decentralized, highly iterative, fast-changing, unmanned, and cheap. Neither the US nor Russia—beginning in 2022—appears prepared. We might now have no choice but to show we can fight and win such a war. The Ukraine Approach Faced with a small defense budget, a much smaller population, and a vastly outnumbered army, Ukraine had to get creative. They couldn't match Russia's industrial capacity or spending. So they abandoned that playbook entirely. They developed an entirely new way to fight, highly decentralized, iterative, and most importantly, cheap. They also created Brave1—a completely new way to conduct war. Frontline commanders log into an iPad and bypass central command entirely. They spend digital points to purchase equipment directly from hundreds of (Ukrainian) manufacturers. When they encounter a new threat, they message the manufacturer directly and work with the engineers to find a solution, even if that means they visit to the front. The result is hardware or software upgrades that once took months now take days. Here's the crucial part: hundreds of manufacturers compete fiercely for these dollars by offering the best possible product as fast as possible. This isn't centralized procurement. It's a market. Competition drives innovation at scale. Weapons evolve as the enemy evolves in real time. Units are also awarded points for confirmed kills, uploaded from drone video—a powerfully eloquent way to grade effectiveness. But the real innovation might be how they decentralized manufacturing itself. Instead of building weapons in massive, centralized factories that make perfect targets for Russian bombing, Ukraine distributed production across hundreds of small manufacturers—workshops, machine shops, garages, and yes, kitchens. Each produces components or complete systems. This approach serves two purposes: speed and survival. You can bomb a tank factory. You destroy production for months. You cannot bomb ten thousand kitchens. If one workshop gets hit, ninety-nine others keep producing. The network regenerates faster than Russia can destroy it. This is why the manufacturing process includes actual kitchens—it's not a metaphor. It's a strategy. The Metric That Defines a New Era The result is staggering: at least 70% of battlefield casualties now come from drones. This is the first time in over a century that the primary cause of combat death is neither a bullet nor an artillery shell. Since World War I, industrial warfare meant industrial killing. Ukraine has broken that equation entirely. As a result, Russia is now controlling less territory than at any point since 2022 and going backward. In March, Ukraine made gains while Russia recorded no gains for the first time in two and a half years, and Drone-led offensives recaptured 470 square kilometers while paralyzing 40% of Russian oil exports. Ukraine has lowered the "cost per kill" to less than $1,000 per casualty—a 99.98% reduction from the millions of dollars that were common in the post-9/11 wars. This isn't an incremental improvement. This is a complete inversion of modern military economics. Yet the Western defense establishment is not learning from this. Rheinmetall CEO Armin Papperger mocked Ukraine's entire approach. In The Atlantic, he called Ukrainian manufacturers "housewives with 3D printers," dismissing their work as "playing with Legos." They are not studying this revolution. They are mocking it. And the "housewives with 3D printers" are beating the Russian army! Ukraine Is Now in the Middle East The US Military and Gulf states face an eerily similar problem. Iran's Shahed drones threaten shipping in the Strait of Hormuz—a chokepoint that funnels 21% of global oil. They cannot fend off Iran by firing a $4 million Patriot missiles at $20,000 drones. They need what Ukraine has discovered: a decentralized, rapidly adaptive defense network that doesn't require centralized industrial capacity. That's why Ukraine just signed historic 10-year defense deals with Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE. Over 220 Ukrainian specialists are now on the front lines of the Persian Gulf—exporting not just weapons, but a completely new doctrine of how to fight. The precedent is set. The model works. Everyone is watching. Mosaic On April 1st, Trump threatened to bomb Iran "back to the stone ages" if they don't reopen the Strait within weeks. It's the classic 20th-century playbook: overwhelming offense force, massive bombardment, industrial-scale destruction. The problem? That playbook doesn't work against distributed, cheap, rapid-iteration systems—especially when your enemy is organized under a mosaic structure. Iran's "Mosaic Defense" doctrine is a decentralized command system where authority and capability are distributed across multiple geographic and organizational nodes. Each region operates semi-autonomously with overlapping chains of command and pre-planned contingencies. It's designed so that when you destroy the center, the edges keep fighting. You cannot decapitate a system with no head. You cannot out-bomb your way to victory when your enemy is not centralized; this was the solution for 20th-century industrial warfare. Defense Wins Championships 21st-century asymmetrical threats require defensive shields, not aggressive offenses. Ukraine has built exactly that: rapid-iteration defenses, decentralized manufacturing, commanders empowered to buy solutions in real time and rewarded for success. That same defensive model may hold the key to opening the Strait of Hormuz. Not through massive offense, but through the ability to adapt and defend quickly. Why We're Stuck Whether you viewed this as a war of choice or not, it has now become a war to keep global trade open. And that makes it inescapable. This is precisely why the US cannot declare victory and walk away from the Strait of Hormuz— or TACO. Every adversary on the planet will interpret American withdrawal as confirmation that cheap asymmetric systems work against powerful centralized platforms. And these adversaries might have sent us a message last month. In mid-March 2026, an unauthorized drone swarm penetrated Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana, home to the U.S. Air Force's Global Strike Command. The fact that this happened not overseas but in the United States, and that these tests occurred just weeks ago, underscores how close this threat is now. They didn't attack. They announced their presence. Every adversary watching learned that cheap drone networks can reach into the US. The Global Supply Chain Risk If the US abandons the Gulf while Iran holds the Strait contested, markets will price this as validation that cheap systems can hold global trade hostage. The current market disruptions will become permanent. Supply chains will have to pivot from "just-in-time" efficiency back to "just-in-case" redundancy. Inflation returns as safety costs money. Trade routes diversify away from vulnerable chokepoints. The global friction tax becomes permanent. The Unavoidable Truth Once you prove that cheap, asymmetric systems can hold global trade hostage, that knowledge spreads globally and irreversibly. Every adversary learns the same lesson: you don't need a $2 trillion Navy—you need $20 million in drones and the will to use them. Withdrawing while the Strait remains contested would permanently validate this model. Supply chains shift to "just-in-case" redundancy. Insurance costs rise. The friction tax becomes structural—baked into every global transaction for decades. The cost of staying is measured in months. The cost of leaving is measured in decades of economic drag. We cannot leave unfinished business.

332

342

687K

3Hamzaaa retweeted