@loc12321 What differentiates the state from simply a mafia or cartel? What about one association that enforces claims coercively makes it legitimate compared to another?
@loc12321 Suppose I burgle your house and put the worth of what I find toward forming a militia to defend the people of your neighbourhood from incoming threats.
Does this mean that I did the right thing, breaking into your house and stealing your possessions?
@loc12321 In fact, I can question this empirically. Do you believe that Iceland in the time of its statelessness was uncivil, simply because of its lack of a monarch as was in the rest of Europe? Certainly, it had less murder and theft, as well as being quite "politically" productive.
It is obvious the state must provide roads, as they have in the USA since 1919. As there was no civility until 1919, when the government began providing roads, we know they must tax the amount needed for the correct amount of roads (c=c, where c=the correct amount of roads.
Let's shoot this individual, Nusrit Shaheen, in the head because God forbid someone with such a condition be alive. It's a miserable condition, so they aren't allowed to say for themselves whether they want life; we just get to kill them if we think their life is uncomfortable.
she’ll grow up to be on constant medication, unable to live independently from her caretakers, scrutinized for her appearance, and a minor knee scrape could threaten her life but its okay cause look at this cute video of her playing with toys 🤍
@TheYcOrg I think statelessness encourages exchange for most interpersonal arrangement without the ability for a statutory mediator, and you need to be unbiased toward the people with whom you interact to be a productive participant in the market.