Matt Forbes

[Matt Forbes @4bzMath]

@danorlovsky7 Connecticut has been fouling all game and getting away with half of them.

[Matt Forbes @4bzMath]

@CoachHPrice Or the Elam ending. That would take away all reason to stall.

[Matt Forbes @4bzMath]

@nickbateman33 We need Furman! If they lose High Point is the only team ranked lower than 43 in KenPom that would remain and they are still a reasonable 88.

[Matt Forbes @4bzMath]

@PeteFiutak He does not dribble after this point. That being said, in real time I think it would be difficult to call.

[Matt Forbes @4bzMath]

@Aaron_Torres Teams get lucky. The selection was very good. If anything needs to change it is the scheduling during the season.

[Matt Forbes @4bzMath]

@coachbrucepearl They should have been in for SMU. But also, better NET, resume, and predictives than Texas and they beat them head-to-head.

[Matt Forbes @4bzMath]

@SethDavisHoops Put Auburn in over Texas and match them up with Miami OH in Dayton. Also, Auburn has better NET, resume, and predictives then Texas and beat them head-to-head.

[Matt Forbes @4bzMath]

@801bracketology VCU win or lose is in. Auburn and Texas for the other two. If Dayton wins, eliminate Texas. Auburn vs Miami OH in Dayton.

[Matt Forbes @4bzMath]

@T3Bracketology I think even with a VCU loss it comes down to SMU, Texas, and Auburn. One or two spots for those 3 depending on the A10 outcome.

[Matt Forbes @4bzMath]

@T3Bracketology Auburn, Texas, SMU, Oklahoma in that order right now. Auburn has best overall predictives and resume, but it is razor thin. Can we make them play into the play-in?

[Matt Forbes @4bzMath]

@T3Bracketology Should Akron and Toledo really be considered bid thieves? Neither is currently in and we have already put Miami in, so neither would be stealing a bid that is currently allotted to someone else.

[Matt Forbes @4bzMath]

Badgers are 23-0 when scoring at least 78 points this year and 1-9 when scoring fewer than 78!

[Matt Forbes @4bzMath]

@EvanMiya I appreciate your comparison to the middle seeds. I think the years at the top of this list had a lot of really good teams and this speaks more to their excellence and not a weak bubble. That's not true for years at the bottom. The 10th ranked team in 2010 would be 30th this year

[Matt Forbes @4bzMath]

@THEbadgermaniac I think the issue is the Badgers have lost 7 times by double digits, Iowa only 3. Badgers also with more close wins compared to Iowa's wins. I think WAB is more helpful when comparing these two (UW-22, Iowa-37).

[Matt Forbes @4bzMath]

@RyanCJohnsen @ColtonWilson23 @WisBasketballHQ I have a feeling your evidence is anecdotal, but if you have the data I'd love to see it. I think the computers are much more accurate than coaches (for most teams). I do think the Milwaukee schools are seeded too high.

[Matt Forbes @4bzMath]

@robreischel @wiaa I think they should have been the 4-seed ahead of Waunakee. I can't see putting them ahead of the any of the top 3 seeds.

[Matt Forbes @4bzMath]

@vrkumar8 @PeteFiutak It would be close. Kenpom has lines almost identical to Vegas. Wisconsin is predicted to lose at Washington (45th) by 1 at home to Iowa (19th) by 1. Utah State is ranked 25th, so it might depend on where it was played.

[Matt Forbes @4bzMath]

@casualbigten Purdue, Nebraska, Indiana, UCLA, Michigan St in order of confidence.

[Matt Forbes @4bzMath]

2nd Round Predictions #MarchMadness

[Matt Forbes @4bzMath]

State basketball predictions for today. #wisbb