UPDATE — MR P | COURT OF APPEAL
The Court of Appeal has today dismissed Mr P’s appeal in P v DPP & Fiosrú, [2026] IECA 193.
Mr P’s central argument was that the alleged illegality arose before the alleged coerced guilty plea was ever entered.
He argued that he was not lawfully before the Cork Circuit Criminal Court because the prosecution itself lacked a lawful evidential foundation, raising issues concerning missing PULSE, arrest, detention and search warrant records, the provenance of prosecution statements, forensic linguistic evidence identifying central and shared authorship, metadata concerning DPP modification of statements after charge, and the integrity of the decision to prosecute.
His case was that, if the prosecution and indictment were fundamentally invalid from the outset, a later alleged coerced guilty plea could not retrospectively cure or validate that alleged illegality. The judgment records his contention that the alleged coerced guilty plea was entered under coercion and threat to life.
The Court of Appeal did not determine any of those underlying evidential issues.
Instead, it held that the alleged coerced guilty plea remains legally operative unless and until it is vacated, and that Mr P must return to Cork Circuit Criminal Court to pursue his outstanding application to vacate the alleged coerced guilty plea.
Only if that application succeeds can the underlying issues concerning admissibility, unfairness, illegality and oppression then be advanced before the trial court. The judgment specifically leaves matters concerning missing PULSE records, the search warrant, forensic linguistic evidence, witness/audio evidence, contradictory prosecution evidence and the decision to prosecute to that court ONLY IF the alleged coerced guilty plea is vacated.
So after High Court judicial review and an appeal to the Court of Appeal, the substantive question raised by Mr P remains unanswered after submissions to four Superior Court Judges:
Was there a lawful foundation for the prosecution and indictment in the first place?
And another question now follows.
What happens if Mr P is not permitted to vacate the alleged coerced guilty plea?
If the superior courts will not determine the underlying legality while the alleged coerced guilty plea remains in place, and those same issues can only be examined at trial IF the alleged coerced guilty plea is first vacated:
where, and when, are those allegations ever judicially determined if that application fails?
That question remains.
Mr P now returns to Cork Circuit Criminal Court.
[2026] IECA 193 — 28 September 2026
Judgment will be published in due course.
Good morning. Tomorrow kicks off the first global week of action against Palantir, when unions, parties, and movements across the world will unite behind a common pledge: Keep Palantir out of our public institutions, and out of our public life.
Join us 👇
“Do you put any importance on the fact that the three day wait has saved lives?”
Aontú Senator Sarah O’Reilly getting to the heart of the issue at last weeks’ Oireachtas Committee hearings.
@HolyEuroKaiser@Ben_Klartext They are public servants. We have every right to film them in public whether they like it or not.
Photography Is Not A Crime remember that.
Female Garda policing EU Presidency at Dublin Castle hospitalised and off duty after 'random' early morning attack
The Garda, who was on duty at Dublin Castle, was set upon in an unprovoked assault in the early hours of Wednesday morning.