THINK:
What is this system's purpose?
#QualifiedImmunity
-Absolves gov't officials of liability for violating rights.
-Denies justice to victims.
[no correction / deterrence]
Ignore names.
A system's purpose is what it does.
Qualified Immunity allows rights violations.
~
!
Updated "QUALIFIED IMMUNITY: SOLVED" includes new commentary on how 3 current SCOTUS cases could reshape rights vs
#QualifiedImmunity
Short read:
https://t.co/k8AFWCuoBq
SCOTUS 4TH AMENDMENT CASE
Scott v Smith 24-1099
Citizen 4thAmend right: "secure against unreasonable seizures"
v
Officer "immunity from liability for violating rights."
Pray for wisdom for our justices.
#SCOTUS#AddThisCase!
#QualifiedImmunity
@OrinKerr Bivens remedy availability would require some form of proper, modern indemnification...to protect the violators who make quick assessments/decisions, and provide reliable resource for victims.
Let's just wonder how that could happen...
@FBIDDBongino@FBIDirectorKash
End Swat hoax simply:
- Verify device originating call.
- Geo-locate device claiming distress.
FBI resources aid small dept's.
3rd level prevent:
- Verify target public profile. Deny vetted.
4thAmend:
Burden/proof on scrambler of teams (@ public cost).
Easy
@ChadMReese@pjaicomo
NYC & Chicago: ~$200MM/yr in "confidential settlements."
Total in city budget, but you can't ID violators.
Better: Accountability.
2,000+ officers have 10+ formal complaints.
20+ officers have 100+ formal complaints...& still carry badge/gun to continue...
Shame??
@elonmusk@RealTomHoman@RapidResponse47
Fix the problem, not the blame.
Where's the gap?
Verification.
Close gap: accountability to employers (& etc) who "accept" Social Security # without verifying person claiming that SSN.
$1M penalty per incident should discourage this abuse.
@Bannons_WarRoom@JoeTalkShow SWAT raids can be 4th Amendment violations.
Law enforcement must: verify caller, device & geo-locate device. Easy tech.
If cannot, must stand down.
If law enforcement does not verify, "search and seizure" is not reasonable.
False claims must be punished.
#4thAmendmentVsSWAT
@Bannons_WarRoom@Shawn_Farash SWAT raids can be 4th Amendment violations.
Law enforcement must: verify caller, device & geo-locate device. Easy tech.
If cannot, must stand down.
If law enforcement doesn't verify, "search and seizure" is not reasonable.
False claims must be punished.
#4thAmendmentVsSWAT
@nicksortor SWAT raids can be 4th Amendment violations.
Law enforcement must: verify caller, device & geo-locate device. Easy tech.
If cannot, must stand down.
If law enforcement does not verify, "search and seizure" is not reasonable.
False claims must be punished.
#4thAmendmentVsSWAT
@GuntherEagleman SWAT raids can be 4th Amendment violations.
Law enforcement must: verify caller, device & geo-locate device. Easy tech.
If cannot, must stand down.
If law enforcement does not verify, "search and seizure" is not reasonable.
False claims must be punished.
#4thAmendmentVsSWAT
@BasedMikeLee@elonmusk
.
.
A guy who knew a little about the structure of our government, Thomas Jefferson, offered some wisdom long ago...
.
.
Now, "Fix the problem, not the blame."
!