What has been committed by the turds of eMudhra is a 26/11 equivalent digital disaster.
This entity should be finished off. Anybody who was linked to this fiasco should never get into a position of responsibility in cybersecurity. The officials who allowed this entity to win so much government business should be pulled up.
Our country cannot fool around in this manner when we are pushing digitalization in practically all domains of business, government and citizen services.
In 2011, then Gujarat Chief Minister Thiru @narendramodi avl said that if his hands were not tied, he would have gone to Delhi and waged war against the central government. Thiru Narendra Modi avl made this statement in response to the police crackdown on the peaceful anti-corruption campaign led at Ramlila Maidan, Delhi. In my opinion, what the Hon PM said then was absolutely right, and there is nothing wrong about it.
Today, you could be jailed indefinitely; your surety bonds could be rejected; and, surprisingly, a Special Executive Magistrate will play circles around you when he/ she is empowered to deal with preventive bond cases.
If you question the violation of due process of law in a democracy, you would be called names, and a barrage of attacks would follow, including being labelled a Foreign Agent.
Ever since I asked the Central Government to speak with the protestors during the NEET exam protests, I have faced constant attacks, but I let them pass because I felt it was important to focus on the issues on the ground in Tamil Nadu. I also, in a way, enjoyed this as it would quickly remove the tag of me being a BJP B Team and sent to TN as a Dhurandhar 😍
Yesterday during a press meeting, I questioned the Delhi Police’s methods of detaining protestors of CJP.
Since yesterday, the attacks have resumed, as expected. For some in the BJP, let me make this categorically clear, in case you have selective amnesia: I left the BJP on June 5, 2026.
As I mentioned yesterday, I might not agree with the tactics of the CJP, and I think many of theirs are misguided. But if you ask me whether they have a right to oppose/argue/protest on an issue that they think is important?
I would categorically say - YES.
So, I would like people to ask the questions again, even if it makes some of them uncomfortable, and I wish the Central Government would answer them instead of resorting to whataboutism.
https://t.co/U1VOaaWCLM was Jantar Mantar denotified as a protest site as per a standing order of the Ministry of Home Affairs after a letter was handed over by CJP seeking permission to conduct a protest?
https://t.co/Gn79sPgy7b long can we have a system that gives powers to an Asst Commissioner of Police as a Special Executive Magistrate who rules over whether to keep someone in preventive detention? The ACP of Delhi Police stands over the trial where Delhi Police is the complainant against the accused CJP. Now you know which way the wind will blow.
3.On October 19th, why did the Special Executive Magistrate, aka ACP of Delhi Police, deliberately arrive late for the bail hearing of those who were arrested from Jantar Mantar on October 13th and recuse himself, saying there is a threat to his life? Is this some kind of a joke?
4.Why were 8 sureties rejected, and why was the person who came for surety subjected to cross-examination by the Special Executive Magistrate?
5. Any action taken on pellet gun usage by the Delhi police or other actions on Delhi police who have violated the standard operating procedures against the protesters during the NEET fiasco stir?
Has no BJP karyakarta in Delhi violated any bond conditions during the previous Congress and AAP governments. I trust the same Delhi police were then also when barricades were jumped and orders disobeyed? How were they dealt with then? Like this?
Definitely - NO.
Now I hear that the detained functionaries of CJP were released by SEM after the case reached the High Court.
I also recently saw a cockroach effigy burned as part of the Dusshera celebrations. Out of curiosity, I tried to find out who is giving this free publicity at a National level. No surprises here. It was led by a BJP MLA, Ashok Goel.
My question again is: is the BJP opposing the CJP or giving it free publicity? Does it want the opposition votes to split by making CJP a bigger player? At this rate, the CJP couldn’t have asked for a better PR team, even if it had paid for one! (1/2)
On November 1st, Rahul Gandhi and the Congress party are gearing up to host a massive rally at Delhi’s Ramlila Maidan. But for the people of India, November 1st is not just another date on the calendar. It is a date etched deep in our collective memory. It was on November 1st, 1984, following the tragic assassination of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, that parts of our nation were plunged into chaos and violent riots - instigated and led by senior Congress leaders.
Fast forward to today, and we are witnessing a disturbing pattern. Instead of choosing a date that promotes national unity, the Congress leadership has chosen November 1st to mobilize thousands into the capital. Is this mere coincidence, or is history repeating itself? Rahul Gandhi’s recent calls to party workers to 'intensify protests' and keep up 'constant carpet bombing' tactics signal a clear pivot away from peaceful democratic dialogue toward street-level confrontation.
When political agitation replaces constructive opposition, law and order is the first casualty. Mobilizing large, aggressive crowds on a date historically burdened by conflict creates a volatile flashpoint. It puts immense pressure on law enforcement, disrupts daily public life, and risks triggering volatile law and order situations right in the heart of our capital.
India cannot afford a return to the political instability and unrest of the past. The democratic right to protest should never be weaponized to create chaos. We must ask ourselves: Is Congress genuinely fighting for public causes, or are they setting the stage for repeat history at the cost of public peace? The citizens of India demand accountability, restraint, and order, not agitation.
This is absolutely stunning. 'Pramana', an open, systematic library of the primary sources of the Indian subcontinent — beginning with the literature of the pre-Islamic period — in their original languages, with their recensions, commentaries and translations linked verse by verse.
https://t.co/M3qLZj7lh4
He was the same person whitewashing the death threats against Nupur Sharma after she called out religious misogyny, all by invoking his self-manufactured “punching up, punching down” doctrine. He’ll happily rationalise religious fanaticism so long as it comes from the very people he has spent years writing eulogies for. Free speech becomes sacred only when his side holds the microphone.
I’d have believed a word he said if he had defended free speech for everyone, not just those whose politics he shares. You’re no scholar. You’re an ideologue masquerading as one. And once Chandrachud demitted office, so too did your influence. Quite happy that it happened.
Now I’m just waiting for the Sabarimala judgment to expose what you’ve dressed up as constitutional scholarship for the academic bigotry it really is when it comes to genuine religious belief. Stay hydrated, stock up on your medicines, and prepare for a very long sulk because a nine-judge Bench is not something you’ll be able to wish away.
“India’s most divisive issue”? It would seem for @MujMash opposing a spiteful hatefilled Islamist’s ‘Islamic Manifesto’ amounts to pushing the divisive envelope.
As for pseudonyms, writers are terrified about revealing their identity when opposing the root cause of what you call ‘divisive issue’.
1) Not India’s ‘most divisive issue’ by any stretch of imagination. But South Asia Bureau chief of NYT is free to take flights of fancy. It costs nothing.
2) Elite and Privileged South Asia Bureau Chief of NYT may not have heard of ‘blasphemy’ killings. The author is only trying to have his head on his shoulders. Strange obsession liberal elites would say, but ordinary folks like to live.
Pseudonyms are used in publications across the world in exceptional cases when sensitive issues are tackled, including the New York Times when a senior Trump official wrote anonymously. There are many reasons why the name of the author is kept hidden, most importantly personal safety.
He’s the south asia bureau chief of @nytimes who wants @IbnKhaldunIndic’s identity to unleash Sar tan se juda gangs on him/her.
Instead of calling out Islamist radicalisation, these buffoons are busy whitewashing it.
Tells you the reporting standards of NYT.
This is the “South Asia Bureau Chief” of @nytimes essentially perpetuating a dog-whistle against another Moslem columnist who has expressed a contrary opinion on a topic. The constant taunts about the pseudonym essentially carry a threat - if we ever learn your real identity, you cannot hide. This person knows exactly what he’s doing. And the @nytimes has no issues with it. It has zero credibility left on covering the Indian Subcontinent 🤷🏻♂️
@ojasbhandarii@ShivAroor Tujhe paas ki jarurat padati hai modi ka lund chusne ke liye. Mujhe laga tu sadak pe uske piche bhagti rahti hai aur modi tere muh me daal deta hai lund