Rolling Stone revelou que a ideia do Daisy Chain Fields já vinha sendo construída por Olivia Rodrigo há ANOS. A cantora chegou a conversar com Brandi Carlile sobre igualdade de gênero nos festivais e nas turnês.
"Há alguns anos, Olivia Rodrigo convidou Brandi Carlile para tomar um café. Ela queria conversar com Carlile sobre como poderia contribuir para a igualdade de gênero nos line-ups dos festivais e nas equipes das turnês.
“Foi como um encontro às cegas”, Carlile conta à Rolling Stone. Ela ficou tocada pelo compromisso de Rodrigo em desmentir mitos persistentes da indústria: o de que mulheres não vendem tantos ingressos quanto homens, não devem se apresentar uma logo depois da outra e não conseguem ser headliners de um festival, muito menos ocupar toda a programação.
Carlile se lembra de ter sentido que Rodrigo iria muito além das palavras. “Lembro de perceber aquilo e pensar: ‘Sim, é ela.’ Eu sabia que ela queria fazer mais com sua ascensão e sua fama do que apenas fortalecer a si mesma.”
“Essas jovens mulheres se mantendo no topo desse universo de shows é brilhante pra caralho”, diz ela. “É incrível ver isso acontecendo agora. Meu Deus, tomara que dure.”"
The ring ding dong swine flu incident kills me because literally as soon as one of them got better and could return to promotion ANOTHER WOULD GO DOWN which would result in some of the most bizarre choices of who would cover what 😭
Judge Raises Questions About ADOR's Evidence in Danielle Case:
"So is the issue only the music? As for the music, no evidence has been submitted showing that there was any completed recording or final product."
Defendant (Danielle's side): "No music has ever been released."
Judge: "Weren't there KakaoTalk messages? Couldn't those be used, to some extent, in assessing the evidence the plaintiff is relying on?"
Judge: "Wait a moment. Who was actually leading the photoshoot? Danielle wouldn't have personally negotiated the contract, signed it, and stamped it herself, would she? You're assuming that other people, such as those involved or the other defendants, handled those matters. Is that correct?"
Plaintiff (ADOR): "We don't know."
Judge: "In any case, that's important if you're trying to hold those people liable. Are you saying Danielle independently went out to arrange photoshoots and pursue music projects herself? If you're relying on events before and after the alleged breach of contract, shouldn't there be more specific details? As for entering into contracts and establishing intentional or negligent liability, doesn't the burden lie with the opposing party?
Unlike a tort claim, if you're arguing that these actions caused damages, you need to specify the amount of the damages. For example, how much money was actually received, or, if that can't be determined, how much additional damage should be assessed through an expert appraisal. That requires further examination.
Otherwise, if those alleged damages are simply included within the overall amount claimed, then they may not be particularly significant when determining whether there were valid grounds for termination."
Petition letter that was sent by NewJeans members to the court:
“Telling us to return to ADOR is like telling a school violence victim to go back to the place where the bully is. We don’t know how loud we have to scream for them to understand how painful this is”