AIG(Former maverick official of CBI): SIKH Issues: Scientific Thinking: Human Rights:
(👉 FOLLOW - If Love Sikhi, Panjabi, Human Rights)
(Obscene is Blocked)
ਮੈਂ ਅੱਜ ਆਪਣਾ ਯੂਜ਼ਰਨੇਮ ਬਦਲ ਕੇ @550saal ਕਰ ਦਿੱਤਾ ਹੈ, ਪਹਿਲੇ ਗੁਰੂ ਨਾਨਕ ਸਾਹਿਬ ਦੀ ਯਾਦ ਵਿੱਚ ਜਿਨ੍ਹਾਂ ਦਾ ਜਨਮ 1469 ਵਿੱਚ ਹੋਇਆ ਸੀ ਅਤੇ 2019 ਵਿੱਚ 550ਵਾਂ ਪ੍ਰਕਾਸ਼ ਪੁਰਬ ਮਨਾਇਆ ਸੀ।
I today changed my username to @550saal in memory of our First Guru Nanak born in 1469, celebrated 550 years in 2019.
@madhukishwar Are you worried about children of "Pakified Khalistanis", about Hindus or about Mahamanav?
Consult Kejriwal and do some Vipasana dubasana ...
Under #BJP/RSS, centralisation has been accelerated in line with the target of #HinduRashtra.
#Indira transferred Education from State List to Concurrent List during Emergency, nationalised banks, later tormented Sikhs (being the smallest minority) to consolidate Hindu votes, etc.
She was the mother of RSS.
#Sangh is following in the footsteps of its mother, of course with extra speed.
@goddek@grok If all religions based on mythological texts are banned, humanity would immediately advance as much as it has done since the beginning of history.
BJP Gen Secy Punjab Dr Jagmohan Singh Raju says Amritpal Singh was very eager to have an alliance of his party with BJP and his representatives met him.
How to provide evidence of parenthood to children ?
Certain things get proved by circumstances.
Particularly, who benefits from something, or who loses from something and repeatedly, is a circumstance.
If A&A are benefitted from every Govt. sale, it means the Govt. is rigged in their favour.
If Indian youth loses from every Govt. action, it means the Govt. is rigged against Indian youth.
If every Govt. decision affects Punjab adversely, it means the Govt. is rigged against Punjab.
Evidence is required for legal action, not for forming a view.
Yesterday, Southall came together to mark 50 years since the murder of Gurdip Singh Chaggar.
On 4 June 1976, Gurdip Singh Chaggar, an 18-year-old Sikh student, was stabbed to death by a racist gang in the heart of Southall, near the old Dominion Cinema.
His killing became a turning point. Out of the grief and anger came the Southall Youth Movement, as a generation of young Asians stood up and said never again.
Half a century on, his community returned to the same streets to remember him, and everything they built in his name.
📍 Southall, West London
🎥 Footage by Amritpal Singh
#ub1ub2 #southall #gurdipsinghchaggar #southallyouthmovement
It appears that the motive was to stop recoding of Digwa by the victim with a phone.
Is it a sufficient motive for such a murder and why was the victim recording Digwa at all ?
Any reason surfaced for that during trial?
Henry Nowak, 18, was stabbed 5 times by Vickrum Singh Digwa (23, British Sikh) in Southampton on 3 Dec 2025 after a scuffle. Nowak was recording Digwa; Digwa grabbed the phone, fight started, Digwa stabbed him (including fatal chest wound) then fled.
Digwa & brother falsely told police Nowak racially abused him ("Paki"), punched him & pulled his turban — court ruled this a complete lie. No evidence Nowak made racist comments. Digwa claimed self-defence; jury rejected it. He got life (min 21 years). Mother convicted for hiding the large dagger.
Police believed the false claim, handcuffed dying Nowak on the ground as he said "I've been stabbed" & "I can't breathe" (officer: "I don't think you have, mate"). He died at scene. Police later apologised.
Motive: spontaneous escalation in fight; Digwa was armed with knives (incl. non-standard large dagger). Not a racial attack by Nowak. Victim's father: "This is not a case about racism. This is a case about murder."
"and accused of hate crimes he did not commit"
Have read many times that Henry Nowak was falsely accused of racial hatred.
But a 'motive' is a very important thing for committing a murder.
What was the motive then?
Did UK police reveal the motive behind this murder, if there were no racial hate comments by Nowak?
Give details @grok.
"social realities that existed about 2000 years ago" are still functional and visible in the news media as well as daily experiences.
"obscurantist interpretations of the scriptures" may exist in other organised religions, but the one based on Manusmriti does not depend on any such interpretations.
Manusmriti has explicit instructions against women and downtrodden that need no interpretation.
Please go through it to realise its enormity.
Please take it lightly. However;
Manusmriti is a charter of inequality that is followed by our society.
This inequality gives birth to society leaders who do not deserve that leadership position.
As a result, whoever thus rises in this society does right things symbolically only, expecting the lower strata of society to follow it.
Immediately thereafter, he returns to his own comforts earned or looted thanks to that inequality.
Any deserving leader would know that doing the right thing has to start from him, not end with him.
Why does he expect only the lower ones to do the right things?
Is it not hypocrisy born of inequality which is inherent in Manusmriti ?