@CorruptM0nitor@gtconway3d Furthermore, he lied about having them at all, obstructed efforts to get them back, and ignored subpoenas. AND he changed his excuses several times, just as a lying child does. You have no idea about document handling and choose to believe the word of a sociopath instead.
@CorruptM0nitor@gtconway3d No, darling. He has to follow certain procedures -- like notify security agencies about the document status -- and he certainly has no right to treat them as his private property. They are GOVERNMENT documents. He's no longer in government. Get it? ...
@zayn_walters@gtconway3d Actually, those spending bills had to be signed by Twump before they could take effect. But that's just one of the things that's wrong with your question.
@SpeakerMcCarthy And of course you can't tell us what they said. And your credibility is so high that of course any reasonable soul should take you at your word.
Oh, Kevin. I was SO ready to believe this wasn't petty payback for the J6 committee.
@JoeLocalSoCal@PatriotMama20@itsJeffTiedrich how they arrived at the conclusion that TFG's lead was "insurmountable," especially when his own team told him he was going to lose.
@JoeLocalSoCal@PatriotMama20@itsJeffTiedrich Sorry. The excerpts, as far as I can tell, spin facts but are basically speculation and innuendo. For one thing, they ignore the fact that most large voting districts take longer to count than small ones, and Dems tend to concentrate in the large ones. I would love to know ...
@JoeLocalSoCal@PatriotMama20@itsJeffTiedrich So far, none of the "evidence" has held up in court. As for reasons for continuing investigations, I can think of several that don't involve the validity of the charges.
There IS testimony, but no evidence as yet about Twump, because no charges have been filed.
@tedcruz Once again, Senator Ted, you have garbled the facts by omitting salient details, like what was on the back of the shirt. You do this sort of thing so many times one might suspect you of ADD or of political convenience. In either case, it doesn't recommend you.
@MadMoonMortigan @bmhochberg @tedcruz No, it's not a violation of the 1st Amendment, which prohibits interference by the government. The Mall of the Americas isn't a government entity. It's the same principle that allowed a bakery to refuse to make a wedding cake for a gay couple.
@JoeLocalSoCal@PatriotMama20@itsJeffTiedrich You're not kidding, are you. I can think of one major lie he continues to tell that has harmed the country: that the 2020 election was rigged against him. He also has claimed all sorts of powers that he doesn't have and his deliberate lies on his possession of classified docs ...