Labour rushes through mayoral voting changes to block Reform
There’s never been such a morally corrupt Government as this one.
Labour tried to postpone local elections to avoid losing. Now they are fiddling the voting system in Manchester.
Shameful https://t.co/YpTCutjurK
🚨WOW: Sadiq Khan personally READ reports on young girls gang-raped in London hotels by Muslims plied with drugs, threatened & abused.
YET on multiple occasions, he publicly denied grooming gangs exist in the capital.
This denial has enabled abuse.
Accountability is overdue.
If Vladimir Putin changed the voting system days before an election to stop his opponents winning, every British journalist would call it what it is: rigging the rules.
Tonight, Labour rammed through a last‑minute switch in the Lords so that if Andy Burnham wins Makerfield and quits as Greater Manchester Mayor, his replacement won’t be chosen on a simple first‑past‑the‑post ballot, but on the supplementary vote system instead.
Why now?
Because Labour knows the race to replace Burnham would be a straight two‑horse fight with Reform UK – and under FPTP, the candidate with the most votes wins, no second chances, no back‑room redistributions, no “stop Reform” stitch‑ups.
Under SV, Labour gets a second bite of the cherry: if their candidate can limp into the top two, they can hoover up second preferences from every other party and magic a “majority” on the second count, even if Reform tops the poll on first preferences.
This isn’t “modernising democracy”. It’s the governing party using its Commons majority and the unelected Lords to hurriedly doctor the rules of one specific contest because it’s terrified the voters might choose someone else.
When the establishment preached to the world about “rules‑based order”, they forgot to mention one thing: in Britain, the rules are “based” on whether Labour thinks it might lose.
We're going to nail this lazy, anti-social, bloke.
However... we're not totally sure of where this fly-tipping location is. We think it might be in Petersfield, Hants.
Can anyone confirm or challenge this? Please email [email protected] with any info. Thanks.
The CEO of the open borders ‘charity’ posing with the illegal migrants the BBC let her plant on Question Time.
All of them were chosen to ask a question!
The BBC is a disgraceful propaganda channel!
🚨 BREAKING: Daniel Rushby, aka "Ponytail" a known Stand Up to Racism activist has been arrested for his role in the vicious attack on 17-year-old activist Young Bob in Manchester.
Footage shows Rushby grabbing, punching, helping restrain the teen, and stealing/busting his camera equipment during the June 15 incident on Market Street. Young Bob suffered bruises, cuts, and a suspected concussion.
Attacking a minor is serious - charges could include assault, robbery, and more.
I wonder if he will recieve the same kind of immediate harsh sentencing that the boys from the Southampton protest got.
🚨The BBC caught red handed.
Remember the Question Time episode where illegal migrants were planted in the audience to lecture me and the country on our border policy?
We now have *confirmation* the BBC PLANTED there and they were COACHED on what to say by a charity pushing for open borders.
The CEO of this 'charity', Jenni Regan, was also in the audience and chosen to ask a question.
Note, when I formally complained to the BBC about this and explicitly asked them if the audience members were coached, the BBC refused to answer.
Now we know why.
One of these men who broke into the country began reading a statement warning against Britain leaving the ECHR, even featuring the Northern Ireland protocol!
One of them specifically attacked me and my family.
Because they had been coached to do so.
The BBC is morally bankrupt.
To deliberately plant men who broke into Britain illegally in the audience, allow them to be told what to say and let them launch into attacks on Reform and lecture the British people is disgusting behaviour.
To conceal it is even more outrageous.
They should apologise immediately.
Labour MP Kim Leadbeater on Radio 4 this morning bemoaning the polarisation in Britain and arguing that the "forces" trying to "divide us" need to be "challenged more". I'd pay a bit more attention if she had spoken out a bit more forcefully against the extremist forces in her own constituency who hounded the Batley schoolteacher and sent him into hiding. Instead, she released a statement (a year later) which included the line: "The reason I am not discussing this matter publicly is that I have specifically been asked not to by the family involved." How brave.
Yesterday in the Lords I asked if every illegal migrant is asked who told them about their boat trip, who they paid and who drove the boat. The Minister’s refusal to answer implies government does not ask migrants to help them smash the gangs. Why?