ScienceBabble 💚💜🤍

A science teacher checking if the grown ups still understand the importance of Science and Reason.

[Kemi Badenoch @KemiBadenoch]

The Conservative Party will work with any Labour leader ready to put the defence of our nation first.

[ScienceBabble 💚💜🤍 @69babble]

@ManAndHisX @CrewkerneMan You forgot that Muslims also circumcise their boys.

[MJ Murphy @hothingsgirlsay]

What Happens When Reality Becomes Negotiable?

[Jennifer 🟥🔴🧙‍♀️🦉🐈‍⬛ 🦖 @babybeginner]

This woman is so brilliant. So articulate. So educated. She’s a joy to follow. This post about how silence isn’t consensus is spot on. I loved it.

[Rita Rake #IStandWithSalGrover @rita_rake]

Seen in @marksandspencer Guildford. It’s a brave company that pushes #Pride locally when the founder of Pride in Surrey was sentenced to 30 years in jail last year for drugging & raping a 13 year old boy.
Video ⬇️

[ScienceBabble 💚💜🤍 @69babble]

@speakoutsister How do the men know who should be

forced to wear a Burkha
aborted
forced into FGM
raped
sold into prostitution
be generally treated as second class citizens?
..oh god I cant be bothered to continue its all so obvious and been explained by more fluent than me.

[Rita Rake #IStandWithSalGrover @rita_rake]

Seen in @marksandspencer Guildford. It’s a brave company that pushes #Pride locally when the founder of Pride in Surrey was sentenced to 30 years in jail last year for drugging & raping a 13 year old boy.

https://t.co/mglcUSoVu3

[Claire Coutinho @ClaireCoutinho]

I have formally referred South Wales Police to the equalities watchdog.

Their guidance amounts to a blasphemy law against Islam and has no basis in law.

We cannot put one religion on a pedestal above others.

We should all be equal before the law.

[J.K. Rowling @jk_rowling]

Yes, period huts are back. Because girls just aren’t embarrassed and awkward enough about menstruation.

But what happens when the trans-identified boy feels excluded from the period hut? What if he feels less of a girl? Perhaps it would be easier just to tell girls to stay home.

[Sall Grover @salltweets]

My daughter is about to turn 4. My dream is that when she is 18, we’re having a drink & I’m telling her what I was doing for the first 5 years of her life & she is laughing saying, “thats the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard” and I can say, “You can laugh because we won.”
We will never take women’s rights for granted.

[ScienceBabble 💚💜🤍 @69babble]

@milkio1 @daverich1 But Israel has conscription so all Israelis will have served their country.
They are also allies of the West whose intel we happily use to avoid another 9/11. The West are at risk from muslim extremists without them.

[ScienceBabble 💚💜🤍 @69babble]

@MichaelRosenYes @Tzioni2 May I complete your analogy? The Welshie had lived in and around the whole of your area for centuries, but had just been kicked out of all the local towns by his neighbours (muslims). He has managed to hold onto the garden, and doesnt want to be kicked out (killed) of there too.

[Sonia Sodha @soniasodha]

‘Unisex toilets outside the main toilet area for menstruating girls.’ In a British school in 2026. This is where ‘be kind’ policies have got us.

[Angela Evans @Angieover50]

@LGBwiththeT Why do you lot always descend into ad hominem insults? Is it because you don’t actually have a cogent argument? Because if you have I’ve never heard it!

[ScienceBabble 💚💜🤍 @69babble]

@hightreebud @LoveWestLothian Anyone else read the excellent book ‘The Red Tent’?

..but that was set in Old Testament times not 2026.

[Trina @hightreebud]

Two shocking points were revealed in this judgment.

First, to their utter shame @LoveWestLothian actually submitted in their defence that they had special period toilets for girls. >>

[Rosie Duffield MP @RosieDuffield1]

Women, leave Unison and join the @DarlingtonUnion!
As well as the sheer ignorance of this statement - complete misinterpretation of the law/guidance/code relating to workplaces (see @akuareindorf) - why would you still give your hard-earned £ to a union that centres a few men..?

[ScienceBabble 💚💜🤍 @69babble]

@hinchlit2 @reformexposed interesting how both the left and right wings are now misogynistic and homophobic...
Conservative rhetoric can oppose womens and gay rights through laws and moral codes.
Left wingers silence women and gays by prioritising ideological purity (trans BS) over lived experience.

[Dan Wootton @danwootton]

The Henry Nowak police bodycam footage is one of the most sickening and disgusting things I have ever seen in my life.
White people are now under attack by the authorities.
This has to be a turning point.
That poor young man. Utterly heartbreaking.

[ukvillafan @ukvillafan]

Being a civil-law-trained lawyer (no capitals required) does not necessarily make you a competent lawyer. Allowing ideology to cloud one’s critical faculties, as you clearly do, is anti-intellectual in the most basic way.

Your post makes a generic claim that lacks any precision, something that one might reasonably expect not to be seen from an ‘academic’. Understandably, this has already led many to ask you for clarification and I am about to add my voice to theirs.

For the sake of clarity, I am a ‘common-law-trained lawyer‘. The difference is that my training was in the UK, where I also practised for approximately 35 years as both solicitor and barrister. That’s arguing real-life cases in proper court rooms before actual judges In a common law jurisdiction.

Rather than simply add to the requests for you to clarify what you say are ‘anti-trans talking points’ and why they are allegedly ‘unreasonable’, I intend to take a different approach. Feel free, of course, to respond to those other queries too.

It is, I believe, a fair assumption that by ‘anti-trans’ you mean ‘gender critical’, or, as I prefer to term it, ‘pro-women and girls’. Your terminology is, thus, not academically dispassionate, which renders your post nothing more than incoherent polemic, deserving of nothing more than instant dismissal. However, I am going to indulge you, despite that.

The following are some core, fundamental elements of the ‘gender critical’ position. I would be grateful if you could clarify which you consider to be ‘anti-trans’ and why.

1. There are only two human sexes, male and female, defined by reference to the reproductive pathway a specific individual is organised to follow. These categories are mutually exclusive, immutable and objectively definable and observable.

2. It is thus impossible for any male human to become ‘female’ (and vice versa) as an individual’s sex is coded into the DNA at a cellular level in every nucleated cell in the body.

3. The terms ‘man’ and ‘woman’ are not ‘gendered identities’ but sex-based descriptors for, respectively, an adult human male and female. They are akin to the terms stag and hind, stallion and mare, bull and cow, ram and ewe etc. used for other species.

4. Irrespective of whether one accepts whether the concept of ‘gender identity’ has any validity, for all Equality Act purposes, no male person can ever qualify as a woman nor a female as a man.

5. As a discrete sex-class, defined in biological terms, women are entitled to the privacy, dignity, comfort and security afforded to them by single-sex facilities that exclude ALL males, irrespective of how any individual man might ‘identify’.

6. Any man who accesses, or seeks to access, a properly constituted female single-sex facility is at least one of a coloniser, a bully, a pervert, a misogynist, an invader, a narcissist, an abuser and an oppressor. It is likely more than one of those things.

These are not fringe or “unreasonable” positions. They are grounded in biology, statute, and decades of established case law. If you consider any of them “anti-trans” or “unreasonable”, then the defect lies not in the propositions but in your own ideological capture.

The floor is yours, my friend. I look forward to your precise, point-by-point response rather than more vague hand-waving about “reasonableness”. In my 35 years in court, I learned that bluster and appeals to authority rarely survive rigorous cross-examination. I doubt yours will either.