@MarouHoussam@binance@_RichardTeng@BinanceHelpDesk P2P is peer-to-peer trading. Binance provides escrow and dispute arbitration, but it's not an insurance company that covers every user's losses. The scammer has already been banned, and freezing the funds is a positive step by the platform.
@jugalpant@binance Uh, blaming Binance for this as well? If you think the project is a scam, but then blame the exchange — that's really stretching it and being unreasonable.
The crypto market is extremely volatile by nature. Token prices rise and fall due to multiple factors like macro conditions, team execution, competition, tokenomics, and more. Investing carries risks — DYOR + proper position sizing + staying rational in the face of volatility is the right way.
Dragging CZ's private matters again is really outrageous. Using someone's family background and ex-wife's parents' affairs to attack them — what kind of level is this?
Does Star Xu still not know how to focus on building OKX properly? Competition should be fought head-on with better products, liquidity, and user experience. Stop with these low-level personal attacks.
The fact is, CZ's story has inspired countless people to enter crypto. Binance became the world's largest through real strength, not by making up stories.
Kanıtsız komplo teorisiyle Binance, CZ ve Trump ailesini dolandırıcı ilan etmek kolay. Kripto yüksek riskli bir alan, dolandırıcılık var ama kurumsallaşmış sistem demek gerçek dışı. Bitcoin defalarca düştü yükseldi. Delil olmadan itham etmek yerine kendi riskini yönet, sorumlu ol. FUD yetti artık.
The big liquidation cascade on 10.10 was a systemic event triggered by macro shocks combined with high-leverage chain reactions—it wasn’t something Binance could control single-handedly.
Users added leverage themselves to bet on the direction; when they lose, they just curse the platform and CZ? Investment carries risks—take personal responsibility.
Here we go again with the double standards. “Not your keys, not your coins” is about the importance of self-custody versus trusting a centralized platform. These British traders actively chose to trade high-risk derivatives (leverage, futures, etc.) on Binance—no one forced their hand.
Investment carries risks. When they lose money, they want the exchange to compensate them; but when they make profits, why don’t we see them giving those gains back?
As for the so-called former CFO coming out to talk nonsense, it’s simply because he bought a Philippine exchange, and now that Binance is entering the Philippines, he’s getting anxious. The guy left the company years ago, yet he suddenly jumps out at this exact moment with his nonsense—and some people actually believe him. That’s pretty brainless.
@wealthyanon For your information, investment involves risks. No one held a gun to their heads forcing them to buy coins on Binance. They want it both ways: when they lose money, they demand the exchange compensate them; but when they make profits, why don’t we see them returning the gains?
@durukanaf I see. These haters just keep jumping up and down, but they can't produce any evidence at all. All they can do is make personal attacks and sling mud.
@RockFellaTrades It's hilarious watching you haters keep launching personal attacks without any evidence at all. Instead of singing and dancing around, Mr. Xu should just focus on properly running OK. Binance has solidly held onto the top spot, and I haven't seen OK catching up to it at all.