Ashok

[Ashok @7ashokash]

@KantInEastt I forgot one more thing, as per the program of the Central Government, the 12th century Tamil Emmar mutt was demolished in Puri. BJP was afraid that its influence might increase in Puri. There was nothing like this in North India, so there could be jealousy also.

[Ashok @7ashokash]

@subhankarhaldar @KantInEastt to rule us? We don't have our own people? not outsider ? "haldar" ! , I checked your surname,Your surname is from people of Bangladesh and Indian Bengal, just like mukharji benarji chatarji.

[Ashok @7ashokash]

@KantInEastt Yes,I saw the video too.But will the BJP ever do this against UP and Biharis in non Hindi speaking states ? They'll reject millions of votes,but they'll never do it. Odisha is closer to South Indians than North India, but the BJP wants to turn it into a UP Bihar influenced state.

[Ashok @7ashokash]

@tripathi18nave4 @rudrabhoj It's not about that, if a person declares himself a propagator of XYZism and secretly and indirectly misleads the followers of some other sect, then this only deserves to be condemned. That is the main point.

[Ashok @7ashokash]

@tripathi18nave4 @rudrabhoj That's not the point, the old beliefs are being transformed into fake guises. If all your Shiva temples are converted into mosques or churches by Shiva devotees out of devotion because they want to see them that way, then don't bring your Hindutva into it.

[Ashok @7ashokash]

@tripathi18nave4 @rudrabhoj This is a good comment,for the first time you understood that equating Shaiva & Vaishnava is as equal as equating two religions.Hindutva supporters should not have demolished the Ayodhya Mosque, they should have prayed there according to Mosque tradition .So will you condemn it?

[Ashok @7ashokash]

@tripathi18nave4 @rudrabhoj This is true for all sects of Hindus,even Christians & Islam. But the thing is that as I said when you propagate another religion by masquerading as a member of another sect,cult, ideology or by claiming yourself to be one of their members,then this only deserves to be condemned.

[Ashok @7ashokash]

@tripathi18nave4 @rudrabhoj Shiva chants Ram naam and Ram prays !!! You have answered yourself, Devi Bhagavatam is not universally accepted, and is not accepted by many sects, even the Shaiva Siddhanta. You will not even be allowed to read it inside the temple.

[Ashok @7ashokash]

@tripathi18nave4 @rudrabhoj Thanks for agreeing to this as well.I am also saying the same thing, but the thing is that when you propagate another religion by masquerading as a member of another sect,cult, ideology or by claiming yourself to be one of their members, then this 'only' deserves to be condemned.

[Ashok @7ashokash]

@gaurav108k44301 @soulrambler_ Samhitas are added later as separate works outside the Vedas. Scholars notice differences in vocabulary, grammar, meter, and style between older and newer passages. Later Vedic development: Samhitas,Brāhmaṇas, Āraṇyakas, Upaniṣads,and Sūtras.

[Ashok @7ashokash]

@tripathi18nave4 @rudrabhoj Do you think we're talking about this ? I know very well who all are misinterpreting things.

[Ashok @7ashokash]

@tripathi18nave4 @rudrabhoj Pay attention to what you said ("At least read the book once.") and what I replied ("I can also give the same logic,").

[Ashok @7ashokash]

@tripathi18nave4 @rudrabhoj The comment thread is quite long,so you may have lost track of the main point. Read them chronologically to understand,Hindutva is fundamentally built on hatred & arrogance .Understanding any ideology requires continuous interaction with those groups to comprehend their mindset.

[Ashok @7ashokash]

@tripathi18nave4 @rudrabhoj This is in Ramcharitmanas, which is not considered a true Vaishnavaite text. Many Vaishnav acharyas have refused to comment on it or even write anything on it. Today it is so popular because it has been promoted a lot by RSS and Hindutvawadis for their political propaganda.

[Ashok @7ashokash]

@tripathi18nave4 @rudrabhoj As I have said, saints or acharyas only explain things according to the philosophy and viewpoint of their sampraday or panth.

[Ashok @7ashokash]

@tripathi18nave4 @rudrabhoj Firstly, you don't seem to be a Vaishnavite at all,
you are clearly a Smarta. Secondly, saints or acharyas only explain things according to the philosophy and viewpoint of their sampraday or panth.

[Ashok @7ashokash]

@tripathi18nave4 @rudrabhoj Thank you for agreeing. Now the second thing,let us understand it this way, if you put a cross in your Shiva temple and indirectly connect Jesus with it and tell people about his leela, then will your answer still be the same?

[Ashok @7ashokash]

@tripathi18nave4 @rudrabhoj Go and tell a Shaivite and you'll find out the answer.
By the way, answer my question directly. It's clear you're trying to avoid my question.

[Ashok @7ashokash]

@gaurav108k44301 @soulrambler_ The Shvetashvatara Upanishad is the first place where Shiva as god is mentioned. This Upanishad is much later than the others.

[Ashok @7ashokash]

@gaurav108k44301 @soulrambler_ The person whose intellect is the charioteer and whose mind is held firmly as the reins "reaches the end of the journey ", (higher than heaven, the highest abode of Vishnu. ). If the intellect is discerning and the mind controls the senses, the traveler reaches liberation.