Chriz

#corruption #geopolitics #occult #economics #finance #metoo #UFOs

-insta:

[Chriz @9Chriz]

https://t.co/8zwdRulSYg

Violence against women and girls in England and Wales has reached “epidemic levels,” UK police have warned, saying forces should prioritize their response to the issue in the same way as they do terrorism and organized crime.

#rapegate #rapecrisis #uk #ukpolice #Britain

[GOP Ls @GOP__Ls]

🚨 BREAKING: Turning Point USA chapter Vice President alleges that she was sexually assaulted and recorded by leaders in the organization.

[Chriz @9Chriz]

Do Prince Andrew next...

#metoo #timesup #royalstoo

[Deep Leaks @DeepLeaksHQ]

BREAKING:

🇳🇴 The son of the Norwegian Crown Princess who reportedly visited Epstein’s island together with her, 29-year-old Høiby has been detained and is facing 38 charges, including the rape of four women - BBC

[UNN @UnityNewsNet]

Walliams on his Britain's Got Talent co-host:

"I love being with Simon, he is a very naughty man, he makes me laugh."

Simon was a 'confirmed bachelor' for most of his life then he supposedly had a child with Lauren Silverman.

Cowell starting to look like his inner self.

A MONSTER.

[The Yorkshire Lass @real_shirelass]

Tick Tock….

[Chriz @9Chriz]

'He groomed me': David Walliams accused of preying on teenage girls after losing anonymity fight.

Award-winning author and comedian is accused of grooming fans as young as 15 in Guardian and ITV News investigation.

#metoo #timesup #EntertainmentToo
https://t.co/Aw5Rf6ZTYI

[Chriz @9Chriz]

Do Prince Andrew next...

#metoo #timesup #royalstoo

[Chriz @9Chriz]

David Walliams accused of grooming teenagers in sexual misconduct claims.

#metoo #timesup #EntertainmentToo
https://t.co/8r9OFASoWS

[Chriz @9Chriz]

A judge scheduled a new trial date in the long-running child sexual assault lawsuit against Aerosmith frontman Steven Tyler.

#metoo #timesup #musictoo
https://t.co/14GUnPHztj

[Behold A Pale Horse @BeholdPaleH0rse]

Warren Buffet casually talks about how dumb the average person is when they gamble, talked about football being rigged and the individual players “point shaving” a football game.

[That's The Badger! @Thatsthebad]

Moment Russell Brand and old friend David Walliams joke about pretending to be gay as a 'smokescreen' on Channel 4 comedy show

[Dani - La SemiYA de la VERDAD @La_SemiYA_dl_VD]

Cuando digo todos

Son TODOS

[Mike Lauderdale @thirlestane597]

It's that time of the year again!

[Axiomatic Enemy of the State @DeTocqueville14]

Russell Brand gets prison.

Prince Andrew gets to roam free.

Something doesn't seem quite right about this.

[Silver Also @SilverAlso]

Interesting anecdote from the Daily Mail https://t.co/xLWScSE7L2

[Rollingstone @Rollingstoned62]

@MalHay He was still the msm's golden boy shagger of the year back then and was very well protected.

[Malcolm Hay @MalHay]

This "Brand" thing is getting increasingly murkier...

text below if you hit paywall

Russell Brand was granted gagging order against accuser in 2015
The High Court judge ruled a massage therapist could not discuss the allegation and that she must pay Brand and his then girlfriend, Jemima Goldsmith, £50,000

By Jonathan Ames

A judge ordered a woman who made allegations against Russell Brand to pay tens of thousands of pounds in costs after granting the comedian a gagging order to silence her.

Sitting in the High Court in 2015, Mr Justice Jay told Szilvia Berki that she must pay £50,000 on account after handing Brand and his then girlfriend, Jemima Goldsmith, an injunction that prevented the woman from contacting the police.

The court order prevented Berki from discussing her allegations — which were never proved — with anyone apart from lawyers or doctors.

Existence of the gagging order is the latest revelation to emerge since Brand was convicted last week of rape and three sexual assaults.

In the case of the injunction awarded 11 years ago, Berki was barred from making “any allegation or insinuation” that either Brand or Goldsmith had “committed any criminal offence against her” — “or behaved towards her in a manner which may amount to a criminal offence”.

A copy of the injunction was revealed at the weekend by Dan Neidle, a campaigning former City lawyer, who also claimed that he understood that Goldsmith was open to the terms of the injunction being varied.

It is understood that Archerfield Partners — the law firm that successfully represented Brand and Goldsmith in obtaining the injunction — no longer acts for either of them.

Mr Justice Jay, the judge who granted the wide-ranging gagging order, is well known for having been the lead counsel to the Leveson inquiry into press ethics, which reported in 2012. The judge, 67, was appointed to the High Court bench the year after the report was published.
📷Mr Justice JayChris Harris for the times
On his website, Neidle noted that Berki, a massage therapist, reported allegations to Thames Valley police in 2014. The police said that they found that the comedian had no case to answer and closed their investigations.
Berki then made allegations about Brand on social media and to the press, prompting the comedian and Goldsmith to take legal action, which, according to Neidle, initially included a claim for defamation. However, judges are generally reluctant to grant injunctions on the grounds of potential libel and Brand and Goldsmith were said to have changed tack and argued that they were being harassed.

In the order granting the injunction, the judge went on to authorise Brand’s lawyers to begin bankruptcy proceedings against Berki if she did not pay the £50,000 within a few weeks. The Times understands that despite the injunction having been upheld on appeal Berki did not pay legal costs to Brand and Goldsmith.

In his analysis of the injunction application 12 years earlier, Neidle noted that Berki was not represented by lawyers. He pointed out that in injunction applications a judge would be likely to discuss with lawyers whether the proposed restrictions were “necessary and proportionate”, and whether they were “compatible with the exclusions in the Protection from Harassment Act”.

But Neidle noted that those points were not addressed in the judge’s ruling and that if Berki had been represented, “a lawyer would surely have raised these arguments”.

“When a person is not represented by a lawyer, a judge is supposed to make allowances,” said Neidle, who added that “being heard on whether you harassed someone is one thing. Settling the terms of a lifelong injunction is another.”

He said that there was no evidence that Berki’s interests “were protected when those terms were settled”.

Neidle said that the injunction case raised wider questions for the judiciary, such as: “How could Mr Justice Jay grant an order of such breadth against an unrepresented defendant, without a trial, and without determining whether her allegations were true? Did he consider the proportionality and necessity of the order?”

Neidle also queried whether other injunctions had been granted in similar circumstances, “supposedly to prevent harassment, but actually silencing people even in private conversations with friends, family and the police”.

https://t.co/Ur1LKc1cQY

[Chriz @9Chriz]

WTF!!! 🤬🤬🤬🤬 #metoo #timesup #EntertainmentToo

[The Times and Sunday Times @thetimes]

Russell Brand was granted gagging order against accuser in 2015 https://t.co/hISxKZthSu

[Truth Org @DTruthsQ]

🚨🚨MAJOR ALERT: A US SENATOR HAS JUST SEEN VIDEOS FROM THE EPSTEIN TAPES OF DONALD TRUMP RAPING AN 11, 13 AND 15 YEAR OLD CHILD, MINORS

[Raymond @Raymond82310289]

I’d forgotten about this….