@rigelthurston@PaulVanderKlay we are confusable creatures but we mustn't mistake our confusion for disorder. Tension exists & we cannot independently discern everything all the time in real time, hence the more restrictive guardrails which at times can be walked on/under but nonetheless serve a vital purpose.
@rigelthurston@PaulVanderKlay I suspect that the paradoxy is perspectival more than constitutional.
Humanity tends to blur & invert created order/authority, inserting ourselves where we shouldn't be & absconding from areas we should be. As is written: the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom... 1/
I think what people find frustrating is the trope of it being an idol. I don’t know that young women in their 20s wanting husbands is idolatry. It’s just naturally wanting something good at the appropriate time.
And I think it’s been kind of destructive to continually sell this line that wanting something good at a season of life in which you should want it puts you in great danger of idolatry.
@HouseMajPAC And I’ll say it again, because I’m right.
The statistics propagandists like you use to try to pretend there are hundreds of mass shootings in schools every year are so fraudulent you should be embarrassed.
You should watch the full video, you might accidentally learn something.
Whenever I spend 1 minute looking into the facts, the truth always turns out to be totally different than what anti-Israel obsessives imply.
The headline is painting a narrative that Israel has perhaps intentionally sabotaged Trump's negotiations by attacking Iran.
Israel—boo! They're controlling us!
But I found it odd that the headline didn't say Israel attacked Iran, but merely began a "fresh bombing campaign." Smells like potential narrative manipulation by omission.
Turns out that my intuition was correct. Israel did not bomb Iran, they bombed Hezbollah in Lebanon. And they did it because Hezbollah launched dozens of rockets and drones at Israel on May 30-31. So it makes total sense why Israel began a "fresh bombing campaign."
In other words, the Daily Mail manipulated a story about Israel responding to attacks by Iran's terror proxy into a headline designed to make people believe Israel purposefully decided to sabotage Trump’s diplomacy with Iran by attacking them unprovoked.
It's a perfect example of how a headline can be factually correct in a very narrow sense by omitting context to serve as reality-inverting propaganda.
"Oh," you fell for a psyop that takes 1 minute to debunk?
Congratulations.
Checking in on the Democrats…
They’re now saying that any Dem who voted for the Laken Riley Act - a bill aimed at strengthening the removal of CRIMINAL illegal aliens - is disqualified from party leadership.
This is what we’re up against.