Zeli

[Zeli @9_gdog]

@24_Hours_Art @toadswiback @Blondie23LMD @RaoulGMI 24 hours of the same exact shit every day.

[jak @JakNFT]

PROTECTION (2022)

[K A L E O @CryptoKaleo]

$ETH

Something like this

[Zeli @9_gdog]

@THORChain not getting hacked

[Zeli @9_gdog]

@THORChain @andreyarapov @ChrisBlec How do we know the nodes are not all just one entity? AFAIK the nodes are anon, so what’s stopping one actor from spinning up multiple nodes and controlling the network?

[Zeli @9_gdog]

@TheCryptoLark Please no

[Zeli @9_gdog]

@banteg any recommendations for a non-dev looking to get into arbing? where would one even begin? any feedback greatly appreciated.

[Zeli @9_gdog]

@dmihal This is a problem.

[Zeli @9_gdog]

@DegenSpartan @Deus0x @Foobazzler @alexgausman You guys do realize this is only measuring 2 capped liquidity pools that are undegoing beta testing and optimization right? Watch what happens when the beta testing ends, caps are lifted and more pools are added.

[Zeli @9_gdog]

@haydenzadams Don’t you think it’s fairly disingenuous to claim LPs are actually collecting these fees when it is quite obvious by now that impermanent loss destroys profits in most cases?

[Zeli @9_gdog]

@martinkrung @Bancor Safe to assume that Bancor’s data is somehow not being digested properly here. Doesn’t make sense it has 0 representation considering Bancor V1’s relatively high TVL on defipulse. Is this @DuneAnalytics?

[Zeli @9_gdog]

@tokenterminal @synthetix @UniswapProtocol @dydxprotocol @Bancor @KyberNetwork So the lower the TVL/E the better?

[Zeli @9_gdog]

@coinfomania @Bancor This is bad crypto reporting.

FUNDS ARE SAFU

@Bancor discovered the vulnerability and white hacked themselves to protect users.

https://t.co/zAp0nSB2aR

This was really well handled by Bancor. They acted quickly and with full transparency.

[Zeli @9_gdog]

@harrycanuck Bancor announced their V2 that enables liquidity provision without any exposure to BNT:
https://t.co/MpQI6rxovE

BNT still needed to enable features like 0 impermanent loss and liquidity amplification on non-stablecoins:
https://t.co/sv9FcPSV1V

Also BNT is gov token in BancorDAO

[Zeli @9_gdog]

@scott_lew_is Accurate.

[Zeli @9_gdog]

@jumpersdevice @AlexWearn @0x_Lucas @RyanSAdams @idexio It’s likely to do with the fact that the focus in DeFi is on AMMs like Bancor, Uniswap, Balancer and Curve. There is practically no interest in traditional style exchanges. Also, if I’m not mistaken IDEX has KYC and some centralized components.

[Zeli @9_gdog]

@TokenBrice @KyberNetwork @ethereum @UniswapProtocol Kyber has always been an aggregator. Liquidity is sourced from pools such as Uniswap & Bancor. It’s unlikely that most of this volume is occurring on Kyber & more likely that its actually facilitated by AMMs. And yes, I agree that volume is trivial compared to locked assets & APR

[Zeli @9_gdog]

@RyanSAdams It’s a shame. TON had massive potential.

[Zeli @9_gdog]

@DegenSpartan @fixedmatchesxx @proofsuite @KyberNetwork @UniswapProtocol @Bancor Ok. Got it.

Optimism based on definite transit to new model moved price, but no actual dividend potential at present for token holders from Kyber trade volume.