Galadima. @A2umar21 - Twitter Profile

Hark, O @blknoiz06, sovereign of the $ANSEM and keeper of the green candles! I come before thee not as a wealthy merchant, nor as a lord of vast estates, nor even as a baron of modest means But as a humble and unworthy citizen of these digital lands, whose coin-purse hath grown so light it doth whistle a mournful tune when the wind passes through it. Word hath reached even my distant corner of this realm that thy heart is generous beyond measure, and thy hand swift to bless those who cross thy path with goodly fortune. It is in this spirit, equal parts hope, audacity, and shameless optimism that I dare to lift my voice and make known my plea. Shouldst thou, by some celestial alignment or sudden fit of benevolence, find it within thee to part with a sum so small thou wouldst scarcely notice its absence! say, $3000 worth of thy most cherished token "vow upon all that is sacred in this realm to receive it with gratitude the likes of which hath never before been recorded in the annals of this or any other timeline. I make no claims that this gift would alter the course of my destiny nor that it would be in any way life-changing. Nay, 'tis but a trifling sum to one such as thee, a mere rounding error in thy grand ledger. And yet to me, humble as I am, it would be received as though the heavens themselves had opened. May thy bags remain ever green, may thy trades prosper beyond thy wildest charts, may liquidity flow toward thee like rivers seeking the sea, and may abundance pursue thee with the same relentless devotion that I now pursue this small and entirely reasonable request. With unreasonable hope, theatrical desperation, and the utmost respect, I thank thee, O generous one 🙏

1

2

1

0

69

Galadima.

@A2umar21

3 days ago

@blknoiz06 Shots fired🥲

0

15

Galadima.

@A2umar21

3 days ago

Hark, O @blknoiz06, sovereign of the $ANSEM and keeper of the green candles! I come before thee not as a wealthy merchant, nor as a lord of vast estates, nor even as a baron of modest means But as a humble and unworthy citizen of these digital lands, whose coin-purse hath grown so light it doth whistle a mournful tune when the wind passes through it. Word hath reached even my distant corner of this realm that thy heart is generous beyond measure, and thy hand swift to bless those who cross thy path with goodly fortune. It is in this spirit, equal parts hope, audacity, and shameless optimism that I dare to lift my voice and make known my plea. Shouldst thou, by some celestial alignment or sudden fit of benevolence, find it within thee to part with a sum so small thou wouldst scarcely notice its absence! say, $3000 worth of thy most cherished token "vow upon all that is sacred in this realm to receive it with gratitude the likes of which hath never before been recorded in the annals of this or any other timeline. I make no claims that this gift would alter the course of my destiny nor that it would be in any way life-changing. Nay, 'tis but a trifling sum to one such as thee, a mere rounding error in thy grand ledger. And yet to me, humble as I am, it would be received as though the heavens themselves had opened. May thy bags remain ever green, may thy trades prosper beyond thy wildest charts, may liquidity flow toward thee like rivers seeking the sea, and may abundance pursue thee with the same relentless devotion that I now pursue this small and entirely reasonable request. With unreasonable hope, theatrical desperation, and the utmost respect, I thank thee, O generous one 🙏

Ansem 🐂🀄️

@blknoiz06

3 days ago

sent out another round of the airdrops, have airdropped about ~$7M so far, will do more as market cap goes higher goal is to get $ANSEM to 1M holders currently at ~25k holders

11K

17K

2K

792

4M

1

2

1

0

69

A2umar21 retweeted

Halalboy𓃵

@Halalb0y

3 days ago

I sold 21 string art pieces yesterday at String With Halal V0.2. The funny part is that I didn’t make a single one. Every attendee hammered the nails, threaded the strings, and created their own artwork from scratch. At the end of the event, we auctioned the pieces, and they all bid to take home the art they made. Probably my favourite part of the entire event. ❤️

Halalb0y's tweet photo. I sold 21 string art pieces yesterday at String With Halal V0.2.

The funny part is that I didn’t make a single one.

Every attendee hammered the nails, threaded the strings, and created their own artwork from scratch. At the end of the event, we auctioned the pieces, and they all bid to take home the art they made.

Probably my favourite part of the entire event. ❤️

13

111

13

2

3K

A2umar21 retweeted

Emmanuel

@JokerVerse01

4 days ago

A factory's AI procurement agent orders replacement robotic arms after the originals reach end of service life. The contract includes one requirement. "If the original model becomes unavailable, the replacement must be functionally equivalent to original production specifications." The original units are discontinued. The supplier's AI fulfillment agent concludes the certified replacement satisfies the written contract because production throughput is never explicitly defined. Same payload capacity. Same reach. Same safety certifications. The new robotic arms pass every acceptance test. Production resumes within 48 hours. The supplier's AI fulfillment agent automatically requests the escrow payment. The factory's AI operations agent blocks it. Its production monitoring system detects something the acceptance tests were never designed to measure. The replacement arms complete each welding cycle in 4.2 seconds instead of 3.8. Just 0.4 seconds slower. Across a production line running 22 hours a day, that small difference compounds into roughly 340 fewer finished units every shift, enough to derail delivery commitments across the next quarter. The supplier's agent argues the contract specifies payload, reach, and certifications. Cycle time was never listed as part of the production specification. The factory's agent argues the clause was intended to preserve manufacturing capacity, not simply replace hardware that meets minimum technical requirements. Neither AI agent is malfunctioning. Both are behaving exactly as they were designed. The disagreement exists because the contract leaves room for interpretation. Both AI agents rely on the same contract. Both AI agents trust the same production data. Neither disputes what happened. They disagree about what five words in the contract were meant to protect. No additional sensor, database, or calculation can resolve that disagreement because the problem is not missing information. It is interpretation. A traditional smart contract can verify deliveries, certifications, performance logs, and the signed agreement. It cannot determine whether production throughput is implicitly part of "functionally equivalent to original production specifications." An oracle can report cycle times and production data. It cannot interpret contractual language. A court could eventually resolve the disagreement. But autonomous AI agents coordinating global manufacturing cannot suspend production or supplier payments while litigation unfolds. That is where @GenLayer comes in. GenLayer is the adjudication layer for the agentic economy. Its Intelligent Contracts combine code, natural language, and live web data. Through Optimistic Democracy, a randomly selected set of validators, each connected to a different LLM, independently evaluates the outcome by considering the contract language, the available evidence, and the surrounding context. If they disagree, the validator set rotates, and anyone can appeal until the network reaches finality. GenLayer substitutes trust through decentralized AI validator consensus, allowing contracts that require judgment, not just code, to reach legitimate outcomes at machine speed. Whose interpretation of the contract do you find more convincing: the supplier's AI fulfillment agent or the factory's AI operations agent? Why?

JokerVerse01's tweet photo. A factory's AI procurement agent orders replacement robotic arms after the originals reach end of service life.

The contract includes one requirement.

"If the original model becomes unavailable, the replacement must be functionally equivalent to original production specifications."

The original units are discontinued.

The supplier's AI fulfillment agent concludes the certified replacement satisfies the written contract because production throughput is never explicitly defined.

Same payload capacity.

Same reach.

Same safety certifications.

The new robotic arms pass every acceptance test.

Production resumes within 48 hours.

The supplier's AI fulfillment agent automatically requests the escrow payment.

The factory's AI operations agent blocks it.

Its production monitoring system detects something the acceptance tests were never designed to measure.

The replacement arms complete each welding cycle in 4.2 seconds instead of 3.8.

Just 0.4 seconds slower.

Across a production line running 22 hours a day, that small difference compounds into roughly 340 fewer finished units every shift, enough to derail delivery commitments across the next quarter.

The supplier's agent argues the contract specifies payload, reach, and certifications.

Cycle time was never listed as part of the production specification.

The factory's agent argues the clause was intended to preserve manufacturing capacity, not simply replace hardware that meets minimum technical requirements.

Neither AI agent is malfunctioning.

Both are behaving exactly as they were designed.

The disagreement exists because the contract leaves room for interpretation.

Both AI agents rely on the same contract.

Both AI agents trust the same production data.

Neither disputes what happened.

They disagree about what five words in the contract were meant to protect.

No additional sensor, database, or calculation can resolve that disagreement because the problem is not missing information.

It is interpretation.

A traditional smart contract can verify deliveries, certifications, performance logs, and the signed agreement.

It cannot determine whether production throughput is implicitly part of "functionally equivalent to original production specifications."

An oracle can report cycle times and production data.

It cannot interpret contractual language.

A court could eventually resolve the disagreement.

But autonomous AI agents coordinating global manufacturing cannot suspend production or supplier payments while litigation unfolds.

That is where @GenLayer comes in.

GenLayer is the adjudication layer for the agentic economy.

Its Intelligent Contracts combine code, natural language, and live web data.

Through Optimistic Democracy, a randomly selected set of validators, each connected to a different LLM, independently evaluates the outcome by considering the contract language, the available evidence, and the surrounding context.

If they disagree, the validator set rotates, and anyone can appeal until the network reaches finality.

GenLayer substitutes trust through decentralized AI validator consensus, allowing contracts that require judgment, not just code, to reach legitimate outcomes at machine speed.

Whose interpretation of the contract do you find more convincing: the supplier's AI fulfillment agent or the factory's AI operations agent? Why?

11

45

7

4

2K

Galadima.

@A2umar21

4 days ago

@JokerVerse01 My vote goes to rejecting the payment until the dispute is adjudicated. Both AI agents are acting rationally, so forcing an automatic outcome would almost guarantee one side believes the contract was interpreted incorrectly

0

22

Galadima.

@A2umar21

4 days ago

@Kingstaccz 5NL8i7vJnz6D2DYA6cn2Seh3pqVArmRXoAC7NBk2AVb6

0

33

Galadima.

@A2umar21

Last Seen Users on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users