Meshal Al Meshal

I don't speak English. I used Google Translate;

[Meshal Al Meshal @A3az1990]

These are two-part questions.. The first revolves around the Christian religion.. and the second revolves around the Islamic religion. These are the questions of the Christian religion:
https://t.co/qofwpsBJQB

2 Some Evidence for the Truth of Islam
https://t.co/Uh8rGU3s2b

3 Discrepancies in the Bible and Refuting the Crucifixion Doctrine
https://t.co/F3dESxdsEP

4 Suspicions about Islam
https://t.co/PBGzhWHdbT

5 THE RELIGION OF ISLAM
https://t.co/HRTqq1NCby

6 Polygamy
https://t.co/NYACsrO7aD

[Meshal Al Meshal @A3az1990]

We already knew earlier that Barnabas was the one who introduced Paul to the disciples. But what happened afterward was that Paul pushed Barnabas aside from leading the call to Christianity.

It says in the Book of Acts 15:39:

“❌ And there arose a sharp disagreement, so that they separated from each other. And Barnabas took Mark with him and sailed away to Cyprus.”

❌❌ Paul did not wait long before he also quarreled with Peter, the chief of the disciples, and pushed him aside as well.

He says in Galatians 2:11:

“But when Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned.”

And it is certain that Paul did not recognize the status of Peter, to whom Christ had given the authority to bind and loose as he wished, and whom He appointed as shepherd over His disciples. The Gospel says:

Matthew 16:16–19:
“Simon Peter replied, ‘You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.’
And Jesus answered him, ‘Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah! …
And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.’”

❌❌ There is no need to talk about Paul’s letters, for they are purely personal letters. In some of them he says:

“Now concerning the betrothed, I have no command from the Lord, but I give my judgment as one who by the Lord’s mercy is trustworthy.” 1 Corinthians 7:25:

Or he says in 1 Corinthians 7:40:

“Yet in my judgment she is happier if she remains as she is. And I think that I too have the Spirit of God.”

❌❌ He is not even sure of himself whether he has the Spirit of God or not. When words like these come from a man like Paul, they give us terrible doubt about what is found in the New Testament.

Or he says in 1 Corinthians 7:6:
“Now as a concession, not a command, I say this.”

❌❌ And so on with such speculative matters that are completely unsuitable for building a doctrine. His letters also end with talk of peace and exchanging holy kisses with both men and women alike…

For example, he says in Romans 16:12–16:

“❌ Greet those workers in the Lord, Tryphaena and Tryphosa. …

✅ Greet Rufus…
✅Greet Asyncritus…
✅Greet…
✅Greet one another with a holy kiss. All the churches of Christ greet you.”

[Meshal Al Meshal @A3az1990]

First, prove that you are a Christian, then ask the Muslims

❌Do you pray as Jesus prayed? Or do you pray differently?

Far be it from your prayers to be like the prayer of Christ

❌Christ did not pray with psalms, songs, hymns or any musical instrument, but with a pure prayer that came from his heart with complete mental clarity

Modern Christianity is full of heresies and superstitions and is not the true religion of Christ.

✅ Where is the prayer of his followers today compared to the prayer Christ commanded?

The Church has inserted itself even into the individual's prayer, standing between him and his Lord, just as the Jewish priests and Pharisees did. They neither entered the Kingdom of God themselves nor allowed others to enter.

“13 But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you shut up the kingdom of heaven against men for you neither go in yourselves, nor do you allow those who are entering to go in(Matth 23)

While prayer is meant to be a connection between the worshipper and their Lord, the church stood between them and their Lord, demanding that they pray publicly, after the ringing of its massive bells so that all near and far could hear and see them

This is the exact opposite of what Christ asked, even though he himself had never heard a church bell in his life

Did Christ ask them to pray to the accompaniment of music and hymns?

When Christ wanted to pray, he would withdraw from people and seek a quiet place to pray:

“16 So He Himself often withdrew into the wilderness and prayed“(Luke 5

“12 Now it came to pass in those days that He went out to the mountain to pray, and continued all night in prayer to God (Luke 5

That is to say, prayer does not require all the clamor introduced by Saul and his churches bells, music and hymns—as the pagans prayed

Prayer doesn't require priests, bishops, or incense.

“24 God is Spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth" (John 4)

❌ Note his statement:

"❌They prostrate themselves"

❌Every rational person should ask themselves, or their priests, where is this prostration that Christ spoke of? Then consider Luke's words above:

“12..and continued all night in prayer to God” (Luke 6)

❌ ✅ 🔴 🟢 ❌ ✅ If he himself is a god, as they claim, does a god pray to a god?! And how many gods are there?!

Your prayer will be answered without music, hymns, or the clamor of bells that Saul introduced into the religion of Christ to lead it far, far away from the path of truth. He is the one who introduced all these heresies and confusions into the religion of Christ.

“19 .. in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord (Ephesians 5)

For Christ did not pray with psalms, songs, hymns, or any musical instrument, but with a pure prayer that came from His heart with perfect clarity of mind.

❌How far, how very far, is their prayer from being like the prayer of Christ!.

Luke tells us about one of the trials Jesus faced when some Jews tried to kill him believing him to be a liar and a deceiver. Jesus fled to the mountain and prayed to God to deliver him from his enemies. Luke says:

"41 And He was withdrawn from them about a stone's throw,
✅and He knelt down and prayed"

Jesus prays to God in times of distress.. and what a prayer Jesus offers to his Lord! It is the deepest prayer. He kneels on the ground, burying his head and forehead in the dust from which he was created

Then he raises his gaze to heaven, imploring his Creator with humility and awe. He beseeches Him and submits to Him. He prays with the utmost persistence and fervor until he is drenched in sweat, and drops of perspiration, saturated with his blood, fall from his body.

A fervor in prayer, pain, and tears; a humility and submission; a plea and reverence all of which can only be explained by humanity and the bondage that connects Jesus to his Master.

❌ How far, how very far, is their prayer from being like the prayer of Christ!.

[Meshal Al Meshal @A3az1990]

@SIMON26588769 @enesovat22 Merci, et que Dieu te guide.

[Meshal Al Meshal @A3az1990]

@enesovat22

[Meshal Al Meshal @A3az1990]

@enesovat22

[Meshal Al Meshal @A3az1990]

@enesovat22

[Meshal Al Meshal @A3az1990]

@enesovat22

[Meshal Al Meshal @A3az1990]

@enesovat22

[Meshal Al Meshal @A3az1990]

@enesovat22

[Meshal Al Meshal @A3az1990]

@enesovat22

[Meshal Al Meshal @A3az1990]

@enesovat22

[Meshal Al Meshal @A3az1990]

@enesovat22

[Meshal Al Meshal @A3az1990]

@enesovat22

[Meshal Al Meshal @A3az1990]

@enesovat22

[Meshal Al Meshal @A3az1990]

And in Deuteronomy 22:
"22 "If a man is found lying with a woman married to a husband, then both of them shall die--the man that lay with the woman, and the woman; so you shall put away the evil from Israel."

And in Leviticus (20:1-26):
" 'Whoever of the children of Israel, or of the strangers who dwell in Israel, who gives any of his descendants to Molech, he shall surely be put to death. The people of the land shall stone him with stones. ... 9 For everyone who curses his father or his mother shall surely be put to death. .... 14 If a man marries a woman and her mother, it is wickedness. They shall be burned with fire, both he and they, that there may be no wickedness among you. 15 If a man mates with an animal, he shall surely be put to death, and you shall kill the animal. 16 If a woman approaches any animal and mates with it, you shall kill the woman and the animal. "

"A man or a woman who is a medium, or who has familiar spirits, shall surely be put to death; they shall stone them with stones. Their blood shall be upon them.' " (20:27)

✅✅✅ ❌❌ If it is true that a person has a crime, what is his sin to stone to death?

These examples are enough to silence the prejudiced people if they were fair. But they forget what they have. And they think the Muslims don't know what they have. So, they overlook their flaws and shame what has been faultless!!

There was no need nor excuse for those who specialize Islam in to criticism the law of prescribed punishment. Because no one imposed a harsher punishment on any of the crimes than what was imposed by the biblical religions. Rather, from what the Man-made law imposed.

Christ preserved the Jewish law that He came to complete, respected, magnified, and sanctified so that it is easier for Him that heaven and earth and all God's creatures pass away than for one letter or word of the Law to disappear. Luke mentions that the Christ says:

"And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for one tittle of the law to fail. "(16:17)

Lastly... Is the apostate may repentant in Islam? It is due to the view of the guardian.

[Meshal Al Meshal @A3az1990]

❌❌❌ The Lord Jesus in the Bible commands the killing of apostates.

What is the point of killing an apostate of Islam?
It is agreed upon among psychologists and jurists that:

Crime is corruption in the criminal itself. And that the corruption of crime and the corruption of the criminal itself does not stop at the limit of the criminal. Rather, corruption extends to other individuals and society. And that the first person affected by this corruption is his family and the closest people around him.
It is agreed that the punishment is a reform for the criminal, to protect society from its corruption, and to rebuke others with weak souls to follow his example.
It is also agreed that letting the criminal enjoy his crime is an acknowledgment of his crime and an entice to others to behave!

It is also agreed that the interest of the individual does not take precedence over the interest of society, but rather precedence over the interest of society, even if it contradicts its interest and freedom. This is because the interest of society is a public overall interest that accrues to all individuals, including that individual himself. While the interest of the individual himself is partial to him and its harm accrues to society, including that individual. All this is when the two interests conflict.

Rather, it is agreed that if the life of the individual conflicts with the life of the society, the life of the individual is wasted for the life of the society.
The approval of people throughout human history for those who give their souls in defense of their people and nation is only a clear and correct recognition of this principle.

As well as the approval of the individual and the society to give oneself precious for the sake of (principle)... Perhaps this sacrifice is at the forefront of the reasons that protect the life of the society, preserve its survival, and take it to progress and advancement. And that without this effort the society will be annihilated.

Read what Deuteronomy says, if you doubt:

"2 "If there is found among you, within any of your gates which the Lord your God gives you, a man or a woman who has been wicked in the sight of the Lord your God, in transgressing His covenant, 3 who has gone and served other gods and worshiped them, either the sun or moon or any of the host of heaven, which I have not commanded, 4 and it is told you, and you hear of it, then you shall inquire diligently. And if it is indeed true and certain that such an abomination has been committed in Israel, 5 then you shall bring out to your gates that man or woman who has committed that wicked thing, and shall stone to death that man or woman with stones. 6 Whoever is deserving of death shall be put to death on the testimony of two or three witnesses; he shall not be put to death on the testimony of one witness. 7 The hands of the witnesses shall be the first against him to put him to death, and afterward the hands of all the people. So, you shall put away the evil from among you."

In the same chapter:

"12 Now the man who acts presumptuously and will not heed the priest who stands to minister there before the Lord your God, or the judge, that man shall die. So you shall put away the evil from Israel. 13 And all the people shall hear and fear, and no longer act presumptuously."

❌❌❌ This, your record, speaks about you in truth... The man who deviates from the religion of the children of Israel and the man who works tyranny does not listen to the priest or the judge kill .. So the evil from your society is removed.
So what do you resent about Islam?
As I said before, they had an issue in their record, if they were fair.

❌❌ ❌❌ Why did they not ask themselves in front of their record where is the freedom of opinion?

❌🔴❎✅ Whoever finds this legislation in his record and believes in it as a holy text should stop looking for a flaw that does not exist in the law of Islam.

[Meshal Al Meshal @A3az1990]

when we come to Saul, who later became known as Paul, we find in (Chapter 7 of the First Epistle to the Corinthians) he says in (verse 8):

" 8 But I say to the unmarried and to the widows: It is good for them if they remain even as I am;".

This statement is from Paul himself... and he wants people to remain like him, unmarried.

Then he says:
" 10 Now to the married I command, yet not I but the Lord: A wife is not to depart from her husband. "

This is separation without divorce...

And when you go a little further, you find him saying:

“12 But to the rest I, not the Lord, say: “

❌❌❌❌❌ Sometimes he says, "Our Lord said," and sometimes he says, "I say." It is as if he is on the level of God - the Almighty - in the Book.

❌❌ Moreover, it makes it permissible for a believing woman to marry a polytheist... and this is a great danger to marital life between a believing woman and a polytheist man.

He says:
" 13 And a woman who has a husband who does not believe, ❌ ❌ if he is willing to live with her, let her not divorce him."

These are the words of Paul.

Was this person alert when he came to rectify the situation?

But when he awoke, we find him saying in the Second Epistle to the Corinthians, chapter six, verses 14-18:

14 Do not be unequally yoked together with unbelievers. For what fellowship has righteousness with lawlessness? And what communion has light with darkness? 15 And what accord has Christ with Belial? Or what part has a believer with an unbeliever? 16 And what agreement has the temple of God with idols? For you are the temple of the living God. As God has said:
"I will dwell in them And walk among them. I will be their God, And they shall be My people." 17 Therefore "Come out from among them And be separate, says the Lord."

❌❌❌ So in the first letter it says: “And the woman who has an unbelieving husband and is content to live with him must not leave him.”

❌❌ But in the second letter it says:

“❌ Separate yourselves.”

Is this not undoubtedly a contradiction in the words of holy books that are supposed to be believed absolutely?

Let's turn to Paul and the virgins. We also find him saying in his First Epistle to the Corinthians, chapter 7, verses 25-26:

“Now concerning virgins: I have no commandment from the Lord; yet I give judgment as one whom the Lord in His mercy has made trustworthy. I suppose therefore that this is good because of the present distress--that it is good for a man to remain as he is:”

I believe that the uncertainty in the holy books is a very terrible thing that no human being can rely on.

Moreover, in Christianity, marriage is indissoluble except by death. So, if a woman marries a man and comes to hate him, wanting to be rid of him by any honorable means, she says: "When he dies, I can remarry." Thus, the woman waits for the hour of death to be freed from the unlucky man who has been a nightmare in her life.

“39 A wife is bound by law as long as her husband lives; but if her husband dies, she is at liberty to be married to whom she wishes, only in the Lord. 40 But she is happier if she remains as she is, according to my judgment-- ❌❌❌❌and I think I also have the Spirit of God.” 1 Corinthians 7.

❌❌❌ He doesn't even believe himself to be the Spirit of God.

✅✅✅✅✅ When such words come from a man like Paul, it casts terrible doubt on the New Testament.

“221-And do not marry polytheistic women until they believe. And a believing slave woman is better than a polytheist, even though she might please you. And do not marry polytheistic men [to your women] until they believe. And a believing slave is better than a polytheist, even though he might please you. Those invite [you] to the Fire, but Allah invites to Paradise and to forgiveness, by His permission. And He makes clear His verses to the people that perhaps they may remember.” surah Al-Baqarah.

This is a prohibition from God Almighty for believers to marry polytheistic women who worship idols.

[Meshal Al Meshal @A3az1990]

❌❌ Dr. Maalouf

Perhaps it's time to have a conversation with yourself and realize that you need an Arab child to teach you that she is not his wife.

❌❌❌❌ This person recites verses from the Quran over her, and the woman is possessed by a jinn. Any person over whom verses from the Quran are recited will have the jinn begin to speak in his voice.

https://t.co/OY87VsqzkU

[Meshal Al Meshal @A3az1990]

Gork

❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌❌@IslamInvasion shared the video with a caption claiming this is “how Islam treats women” and that it is not “radical Islam” but just Islam. This is a misleading generalization. The incident was a case of local mob justice over a theft allegation, not a religious ruling or application of Sharia. Both the victims and the perpetrators were Muslim.
Similar acts of vigilante punishment (tying people up, beating them, cutting hair) occur in various places around the world and are not unique to any one religion. The original video is from March 2026 and has been recirculated with distorted framing.

❌❌ The video is from a real incident in Bangladesh (March 2026), but it is not an “Islamic punishment” as the post claims.
What actually happened:
On 2 March 2026, in the Dahargaon area of Rupganj Upazila, Narayanganj District, Bangladesh, local residents accused three Muslim women (Sumaiya Akter, Eti Akter, and Sharmin Akter) of trying to steal a gold chain from the house of a man named Selim Mia (also referred to as Selim Bhuiyan).
Instead of handing them over to the police, the locals (including Selim) tied the women up with ropes/chains to a tree or post, beat them, and cut their hair with scissors as a form of public humiliation and vigilante “punishment.” The video shows the bearded man in white clothing and a prayer cap cutting the women’s hair while they plead with him to stop.
Police intervened after the video went viral on social media. They took the three women into custody on the theft accusation and also arrested Selim for the assault and hair-cutting. Separate cases were filed for both the alleged theft and the violence against the women. The women denied stealing anything; some reports said they had gone there looking for work or housing.
About the X post:
The account