@AJNlive 1. There is no proof that the man said anything about the pastor's family.
2. The pastor aggressively charged at the other man after speedwalking 100 yards through a field and a 4 lane highway.
3. The pastor and his family were NOT in immediate danger to justify self defense
@DailyCaller Instead, he chose to be the violent aggressor and criminally assault & batter a man for words that were allegedly said. (there is no proof that the other man said anything)
Besides all of that, this is not God's way.
@DailyCaller The pastor is 100% wrong. He attacked and brutally battered another man with no justification. There was no immediate threat or danger. In the time the pastor covered over 100 yards of grass and a 4 lane highway he could have called the police or video recorded everything.
It is frightening that Democrat Jewish Congressman are being thrown out of coffee shops in Brooklyn, New York. It's not 1930's Germany. This is the United States of America.
STUNNING: USAID + THE BIG GRIFT
Looks like USAID supported college tuition for Anwar Aulaqi (Awlaki) who later became a high level al Qaeda terrorist.
Aulaqi falsely claimed he was born in Yemen to secure the financial help via the State Dept. when he was actually a US citizen, born in Las Cruces New Mexico.
Aulaqi would later develop close ties with several 9/11 hijackers and attain leadership status in AQ's Yemen affiliate.
Aulaqi was the godfather of the digital jihad that leveraged his writings and the web to radicalize Americans to AQ's cause.
Aulaqi became the first American targeted for death by the CIA. In 2011, he was killed in a US drone strike.
This 1997 Aulaqi mugshot is for soliciting prostitutes.
Good catch first flagged Feb. 2025 via
@browne_pamela@intelwire
@gorrillavision@CollinRugg@Howlingmutant0 Still not justification to assault and batter someone. There was no immediate threat to anyone. His family was not present to be in immediate danger. The pastor was wrong.
@talon2fe@OdogOffLeash@CollinRugg@tuckerfudpucker@grok If you are charging at someone aggressively and your aggressive approach strikes fear in the other person, that is assault. That is what the pastor did in the video and that is what the other man was reacting to.
You don't get to charge at someone then call it self defense.
In 2014, 300 scientists warned Anthony Fauci would start a global pandemic.
Following the high-profile escape of three bugs from U.S. labs, these 300 scientists sent a letter to President Obama, urging him to shut down Anthony Fauci's gain-of-function research.
Obama issued a moratorium and shut down 18 of the worst projects by Anthony Fauci. In the end, he really didn't shut them down. Instead, Obama moved the research offshore to places like Ukraine, the former Soviet State of Georgia, and the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China.
Now, it is widely accepted that COVID-19 originated from that very lab in Wuhan, China.
Those 300 scientists were right about Fauci…
But the big question is, why are people like him so obsessed with creating dangerous pathogens in the first place? 🧵
@LauraGrant8720@DigitalGermania@CollinRugg Still nothing that justifies a man covering 100 yards aggressively charging at a man, attacking and beating him.
There was no immediate danger. The pastor is just a violent man who lost control of his emotions.
@DigitalGermania@CollinRugg Running around and violently attacking people for words that they said? You really think that is the "Christian" thing to do?
@Kat1611AVgykw@Just_Randle@CollinRugg In now way did any of that cause an immediate danger to anyone to justify a man covering 100 yards across a 4 lane highway and beating another man like that.
@Just_Randle@CollinRugg Could be that the pastor covered over 100 yards in an aggressive manner and charged at the man. It could be something verbal that we didn't hear or don't know was said as he charged at the man.
@talon2fe@OdogOffLeash@CollinRugg@tuckerfudpucker@grok Fighting words are not justification for attacking and battering a man.
It can be justifiable to charge the man for disorderly conduct, but there was no immediate danger to justify "self defense" or defense of others.