What PROTEST has done to us from inception till date :
ORTHODOX:
Men and women to sit separately in order to hinder any form of immorality that could emanated from our sense of organs
Women to dress with all sexy and curvy part of their body covered to allowed men concentrate and not to lead them to temptation. Exposure of women’s body is prohibited
Emphasis on wearing of expensive clothes are not pronounced
Preaching is in the form of lesson and reminder of what you stand to gain for all your good deeds and possible punishment for doing bad
Preaching are localized with sessions arranged in some of our local languages and an interpreter when English is used. The aim is to ensure everyone understand
Music is strictly Choral Gospel led by a conductor ( Orchestra Type)
Tithe are announced moderately and emphasis on voluntary payment
No much money is raised since emphasis is not on money but to gather to remind each other the word of God. The few money raised are use to maintain the church. Leaders has their individual source of income and need not manipulate members to enrich themselves. To them, acquiring worldly things are vanity
Relationships with other religions are cordial and sharing of foods during inter religious festivals are encouraged.
PROTESTANTS
Men and women should sit together, no separation. Control your heart not to be affected with immorality
Women dressing does not mean, half nakedness is acceptable so far the Men can work on their mind not to commit “lookery “🤣🤣🤣
You most come to service with your best clothes. Emphasis on Expensive clothes is highly emphasized
Preaching is like that of a motivational speaker. Everyone must be rich. No one is meant to be poor are the emphasis
Preaching language is strictly English. FLUENCY and good INTONATION is the main tool.
Music 🎼 in the form of Rap, Reggae and Pop are the style
It’s a curse not to pay Tithe. Names of people not paying are announced to push them to pay at all cost
Money raised from members are use to buy Personal aircraft, University, polytechnics and properties
Relationships with other religions is forbidden. Superiority of religion is fanatically embraced
GOD:
I see everything, wait till Judgement day for my view and verdict. Continue your ways
There are TRUTH without FACT and their are FACT with no iota of TRUTH
Psalm 119 verse 160 : The word is True from the beginning and every one of thy righteous judgment endureth forever
| NUC and TUC | The End | Yorubaland | Ronaldo | Zainab | Enugu | Yhemo Lee | Manuel Ugarte | Seun | Oyetola | Chidinma | Nuhu | Timaya |Ribadu | Opay | Yorubas | Biggie | Kano | Not in Nigeria | Tayo
@FinPlanKaluAja1 In KPMG report under Non-resident tax, they mixed-up the understanding of withholding tax as a method of tax collection to tax itself. This created confusion to their understanding as to why Tax Returns is needed and not needed in some cases.
@FinPlanKaluAja1 Very true. There is no way the report could be free from errors but unfortunately no errors has been spoted. What KPMG spotted was ACADEMIC view with no substance. Does not reflect sound understanding of tax principles
@DonAzag All issues raised by KPMG are not errors but a clear misunderstanding of the principles and concepts of Tax. I will describe the KPMG observations as mere ACADEMIC view far from tax substance and legal form.
@DonAzag With these list: Individual, Company, Estate, Trustees. ALL Taxable Person are captured. “Community” can fall under individual, Trustees or Company Limited by Guarantees which is under d umbrella of Company. The KPMG team are off point. Taxable person not same as taxable income
@DonAzag KPMG team misunderstood the fact that WHT itself is not a tax but method of tax collection. WHT applies on listed transactions. If foreign companies transact only on WHT listed transactions, then no returns is needed. WHT = Final tax but if outside the list, Returns is required
@DonAzag@abayomi4sam KPMG team that review the tax law are amateurs. Community can take the forms of “Trustees”, “ Individual” or Company Limited by Guarantee which falls under the umbrella of “Company”. KPMG misunderstood diff. btw Taxable Person & Taxable Income. Taxable person was clearly defined
It’s just unfortunate the way @victorosimhen9 is been misunderstood. His loves for @NGSuperEagles is second to none. We shd not forget the miss of D World Cup still hurts him. He was only expressing sportsmanship concern to @Alookman_ and that was misunderstood
@Saheedtoriola@FinPlanKaluAja1 Infact I struggle to understand the point he is trying to make. This is because, seizures of property ( POWER TO DISTRAIN) is in existing tax law abinitio
WE MUST PROTECT OUR LAW AND COURT OF JUSTICE DEVOID OF SENTIMENTS AND EMOTIONS
This is my summary of events between the IPOB leader Nnamdi Kanu, tge Prosecutor (FG Lawyers) and the Federal High Court, Abuja.
Nnamdi Kanu’s Argument:
The Act upon which his charges were made by the Prosecutors is the TERRORISM (PREVENTION) ACT 2011 and ammended in 2013
The Act was repealed and replaced by another act TERRORISM (PREVENTION) ACT 2022
Kanu’s argument was that, since the Act under which his charges were based has been repealed, it means he has no case to answer and further relied on Section 36(12) of the 1999 constitution that states : “A person shall not be convicted of a criminal offense unless the offense is defined and the penalty prescribed in a written law”
No law, No offense. Therefore his defense was NO CASE SUBMISSION and refused to enter his defense.
Prosecutors’ Argument:
The prosecutor is of the opinion that Kanu has a case to answer and relied on section 6 of the interpretation Act which stated that “Repealing a law does not stop ongoing cases unless the law say so”
The position of the Court - Hon Justice Omotosho :
The court agree with the prosecutor that Kanu has a case to answer per section 6 of the interpretation Act and since Kanu did not defended himself, the court rested his case on that of the prosecutor and pass judgment.
Emphasis on Section 6 of the interpretation Act is “ongoing cases” and “if the NEW law say so”
The question is: Did the New Law expressly say so?
Whatever your answer is, Kanu has the right to appeal the Federal High Court's decision to the Court of Appeal and potentially the Supreme Court.
We should all appeal that this time around, Kanu should work with his legal team devoid of sentiments and emotions. His lawyers has two major cause of actions at the upper courts :
(1) To challenge the Jurisdiction properly this time around and avoid “Court of Public Opinion Syndrome”
(2) To look for section of the New Law that can be twisted to say “The New Law Say So” in order to align with Section 6 of the interpretation Act.
We don’t actually have business in the next FIFA World Cup. DR Congo deserves it more than coming through the back door. Imagine God giving a second chance and squandered. A typical Nigerian’s style #NGACOD
Grammy has come with it again….. the usual conflict driven nominations ahead of next year's ceremony, which takes place in Los Angeles on 1 February, 2026.
Tyla
Davido 30BG
Burna Boy
Ayra Starr
Wizkids FC
Eddy
I am incredibly proud of President Tinubu’s response so far.
No press conferences, No jittery trip to Washington, No panic. Just the typical silence you give to a mad man who doesn’t understand boundaries while you keep working on your security architecture.
My GOAT!
@EaseOfBizNG@cacnigeria1 nothing like ease of doing business with CAC . Well done for speaking out on this. It seems no one knows how to advocate this challenge on behalf of Lawyers and Chartered Accountants in practice #Nigeria
If you’ve ever prayed before clicking “Submit” on a govt portal
Congrats you’ve experienced Nigeria’s Ease of Doing Business 😅💻
At EaseBizNG ⚖️, we track the real story behind CAC, FIRS & Interior where “ease” still needs deliverance. 🇳🇬
#EaseOfDoingBusiness#EaseBizNG