ADreamofBeingaPerson

[ADreamofBeingaPerson @ADreamofBeing]

@Rookie_16_3 @DailyMail >People who resort to slinging insults like "sneaky little bastard" and "tubby little nobody" clearly have a lot of valuable opinions about motorsport.

>What a clown

Ironic, lol

[ADreamofBeingaPerson @ADreamofBeing]

@DenOlabamiji @Jbotsx @Howlingmutant0 @johnnymaga You really can't figure out what I'm talking about?

[ADreamofBeingaPerson @ADreamofBeing]

@baby_oftheyear @BootsFin @serketpeixes That study is a perfect example of what I was saying, lol. Stupid people are more likely to use AI. Putting someone who does their own research into the group that used AI did not reduce their performance.

Smart people do more of their own research =/= AI makes you stupider

[ADreamofBeingaPerson @ADreamofBeing]

@baby_oftheyear @BootsFin @serketpeixes I mean, it literally doesn't. Please learn to read studies, not just the headlines.

Participants who were in the no-AI group and moved to the AI group performed higher than the AI group did and no mention is made of any reduction anywhere.

[ADreamofBeingaPerson @ADreamofBeing]

@SteveRogerSmith @ruskienboots @dailystar Not sure why, you mentioned it in your own tweet

>Also the The High Court case was David Walliams's application for the actual injunction against The Guardian and ITN.

"Urm, there was no court case, it was just an ongoing court case"

[ADreamofBeingaPerson @ADreamofBeing]

@SteveRogerSmith @ruskienboots @dailystar Nitpicky. The scenario they were describing doesn't happy. Walliams and the current celebrity have injunction orders in place because of an ongoing court case

[ADreamofBeingaPerson @ADreamofBeing]

@seanwillis79 @WildMediaOnly By going into oncoming traffic

[ADreamofBeingaPerson @ADreamofBeing]

@baby_oftheyear @BootsFin @serketpeixes Some people got fat once they owned cars because they didn't walk anywhere.
Some people got worse at maths because their phone is a calculator

A car does not make you lazy, a phone doesn't make you bad at maths. AI doesn't make you stupid in exactly the same way.

[ADreamofBeingaPerson @ADreamofBeing]

@DenOlabamiji @Jbotsx @Howlingmutant0 @johnnymaga How do you fall for the most obvious bait of all time?

[ADreamofBeingaPerson @ADreamofBeing]

@ruskienboots @dailystar You can't have an injunction without an ongoing court case. The only way media would be barred from publishing the story once the case is over, would be if it was actually defamation.

There is no scenario where a person convicted of breaking the law, gets to hide that like this

[ADreamofBeingaPerson @ADreamofBeing]

@ruskienboots @dailystar What are you talking about?

Walliams is a perfect example here. He filed a civil lawsuit against media orgs to prevent them reporting the story. The courts granted an injunction, and once the courts decided there was no grounds for the injunction to remain, it was lifted.

[ADreamofBeingaPerson @ADreamofBeing]

@KingOfAllSpuds @Richisbackmfer @Polymarket People tend to dislike the weird moralising about topics you have zero knowledge on. The feds pretty regularly take down child abuse sites. Loads of things to criticize them for, but focusing on drug markets and not those sites isn't one of them

[ADreamofBeingaPerson @ADreamofBeing]

@INTLTG5150 @Gitmo99 @TonyLaneNV Right? I'm glad he's dumb, but how on earth does someone become a luggage thief without even thinking of the most obvious excuse possible?

[ADreamofBeingaPerson @ADreamofBeing]

@Gitmo99 How on earth do you actually get done for this, lol? Like surely if he wasn't obviously acting guilty from the first second, you'd just say you grabbed the wrong bag and the cops would have left it there?

I mean, good that he's a moron, I guess

[ADreamofBeingaPerson @ADreamofBeing]

@_caswel @johngalt_shrugs @reddit_lies >You have a button that will generate 1,000,000 in whatever currency you want
>whenever you press it
>someone else gets the same button

It's not ambiguous at all.

[ADreamofBeingaPerson @ADreamofBeing]

@ruskienboots @dailystar Well they can't. Injunctions like this (ignoring the misleading headline) are during the case, not after conviction.

[ADreamofBeingaPerson @ADreamofBeing]

@expandmine @SocialistVoice @dailystar Learn to read

[ADreamofBeingaPerson @ADreamofBeing]

@Moesby66 @SocialistVoice @dailystar Real NPC logic. How on earth did you read that as saying there was no issue or defending pedophiles?

[ADreamofBeingaPerson @ADreamofBeing]

@CJohnCC @SocialistVoice @dailystar Not really. You shouldn't just accept that people are going to publish incorrect and misleading information just because the topic is something bad

[ADreamofBeingaPerson @ADreamofBeing]

@SteveRogerSmith @njbennett @dailystar It's over the last ten years. So it's just 100 cases on varying topics over a decade. Not 100 celebrities and not one case