@bolt_carl@MrBrightside319@skscartoon You don't care about evidence or truth, you're merely a divisive tool spreading the hate filled propaganda you've been taught, pitting real human beings against themselves over political ideologies that the parties they proclaim for don't even believe in.
@bolt_carl@MrBrightside319@skscartoon Her blood is on the hands of people like you. Barely literate fools tossing your opinion wholeheartedly into an argument you don't even understand. You think it's left and right because you're brainwashed into looking directly ahead of you for an enemy.
@bolt_carl@MrBrightside319@skscartoon Ohhh so now you care about wrongful convictions? I wasn't aware, seeing as how you believe, no matter what, that woman was attempting to kill this man and he had absolutely zero choice, including not walking in front of an operating vehicle, but to shoot her.
@bolt_carl@MrBrightside319@skscartoon Oh, to add even more to that point, all that I'm pointing out is what a prosecutor would use for their prosecution in a court of law. Your opinion, nor mine, matters when it comes to legality. You're arguing for nothing.
@bolt_carl@MrBrightside319@skscartoon He also escalated the situation in the first place, unless he produced a warrant or can produce that proof to be able to claim interference from a us citizen.
@bolt_carl@MrBrightside319@skscartoon I'm sorry you don't understand legalese and believe you can put yourself in a position of knowledge because of it. Everything he points out is what a defense attorney could claim in his case, not proof he's innocent. His own willingly given video evidence also goes against him.
@bolt_carl@MrBrightside319@skscartoon It doesn't, but you've proven time and again that you don't understand legalese so you don't get to really dismiss anything.
@bolt_carl@MrBrightside319@skscartoon Spoiler. He cited many different laws and cases that prove the officer is anything but innocent. Sorry you're dumb.
@bolt_carl@MrBrightside319@skscartoon Criticizing a typo because there's nothing to dispute. Every big of evidence given just proves that the claim of inescapable harm is impossible to maintain. I'm sorry that you're a moron and don't understand what legal speak is.