@InverseFarmer@AnHonestNode@tether@Strike Tether is not buying Strike.
If Strike is ever part of a larger company, it will only be because I retain ultimate control and decision-making authority.
Otherwise, Strike will not be sold to anyone, ever.
bitcoin maximalism was coined by vitalik in 2014
it was a straw man: people who called him out for printing tokens and selling them for bitcoin were close minded
stack real bitcoin, not that fake shit
Who could have imagined Trumps second term would prove far more catastrophic and detrimental than his first. I voted for him the second time. He had everything lined up on a plate. Complete collapse.
Great piece from First Amendment scholar Matthew Schafer on the press freedom legislation the Trump admin has proven we urgently need, from the PRESS Act to protect source confidentiality to Espionage Act reform to stop criminalization of newsgathering.
https://t.co/kr12xnTVXP
Highly proactive / innovation-first ✔️
“Global AI sandbox” incentives ✔️
Free for the government, universities, startups, & researchers ✔️
Can’t wait to see how synthetic data unlocks human potential across the globe 🚀
We care deeply about Bitcoiners. At Strike, there is nothing more important than helping our customers' secure their bitcoin.
This week we shipped an update to our emails that renders email-based phishing attempts completely obsolete.
Anti-phishing codes are now live on Strike.
@ericweinstein icymi, Eric has spoken publicly about the American Flag tablecloth at least as far back as March 2020, on The Portal, Ep. 25 “The Construct - Jeffrey Epstein”. Here’s the relevant clip.
I’m willing to testify under oath that I saw at least two partially hidden cameras.
I assume that’s why a network of IC accounts constantly accuse me of being unreliable/fraud/grifter/charlatan/etc
Like when I was the *ONLY* one who told you about the American Flag table cloth:
Journalists who have fought back against the administration's censorship have almost all prevailed. This lawsuit should be another winner.
There's no excuse for taking these attacks lying down. https://t.co/12kxMCHDFY
#EpsteinFiles DOJ/FBI Didn't Conclude that Jay-Z Was Involved (see EFTA01660622, pages 1-21)
At the conclusion of the FBI/DOJ document dump regarding Epstein, they gave a timeline of the Epstein/Maxwell federal cases from 2006 to July 2025. Even though the fed investigation was officially opened in 2006, it considered allegations of crimes that occurred before that date, even years before.
In the end, the FBI compiled a list of prominent people who were accused by the victims. Please note that accusations do not mean that the individuals were deemed guilty or that the alleged victims were deemed credible. Accusations also do not mean that the DOJ felt it had proof beyond reasonable doubt to charge the individuals. Also, charging the individuals would not mean that the individuals would've been convicted of the crimes charged.
With the above caveats, here the prominent names identified by the DOJ:
1. Donald Trump 2. Harvey Weinstein 3. Glen Dubin 4. Prince Andrew 5. Jess Staley 6. Les Wexner 7. Leon Black 8. Alan Dershowitz 9. Bill Clinton 10. Howard Lutnick 11. William Barr
Conspicuously absent from this DOJ list is ANY mention of Jay-Z. Conspicuously absent is any mention of any Black man.
Jay-Z has certainly been a prominent person from 2006 until the present time. Yet, the DOJ didn't include his name among the prominent people identified by the Epstein victims. Jay-Z's politics is well known. Thus, it would be ridiculous to suggest that the DOJ - which listed President Trump's name - went out of its way to shield Jay-Z's name. If Jay-Z was accused by an Epstein victim, his name would've featured prominently on that list.
The fact that Jay-Z's name was not on that list leads me to surmise that the FBI and DOJ reached a conclusion that he was not accused, involved or implicated in Epstein's crimes. There was no evidence that Jay-Z was even in Epstein's orbit.
Important fact: Most if not all of the people on that list have had direct communications with Epstein through in-person conversation, phone calls, texts or email. Yet, there is no evidence that Jay-Z ever met Epstein or that Jay-Z communicated with Epstein.
Jes Staley: Jes Staley's 2014 email mention of Jay-Z led people, including prominent YouTubers, to make wild accusations about Jay-Z paying off the masses to stop them from storming the streets. This Jes Staley is the same person that an alleged victim said "forced her to put her hands on his crotch and had rough sex with her." That's the same Jes Staley who people on social media find credible? Finding him credible enough to use his 2014 email to disparage Jay-Z? Unbelievable! See Document Below:
By the way, with respect to the July 10, 2019 call in which the caller said Jay-Z was present at Epstein's house when Weinstein sexually abused her, I think I've found out who the caller is. Because there is a possibility that she is a real victim of some kind and because of my profession, I won't reveal her identity. She is not a celebrity. The person I have in mind has enormous mental competency and credibility issues.
BREAKING: Actor Shia LaBeouf pleaded guilty to three counts of simple battery for punching people outside a New Orleans bar during Mardi Gras. https://t.co/aWyyb7qP61
@AP Few years ago, Ji-Young Min @GSK (https://t.co/X758PulqY6) smuggled several vials of the deadly MERS-CoV virus on a Seoul to Paris flight with no charges from 🇫🇷 or 🇰🇷 governments. It makes you wonder how safe we are from these virus smugglers...
Two scientists at a U.S. government lab have been charged with smuggling vials of deactivated mpox virus into the country from Africa without permits and lying about it to investigators. https://t.co/PEAmM8l25o