AFKyim Dostum

[AFKyim Dostum @AFKyimdostum]

@6161221u_ @Antonchigurh42 donum kanadı mk

[AFKyim Dostum @AFKyimdostum]

yani cinlerle mi çalışlıyorlar 😱😱

[A.Y.O @YusufAsunmogejo]

There is nothing special in what they are doing. What is happening here is just a type of black magic called Sihr Al-Hijabah (protection sorcery). It is powered by a specific class of ground Jinn known as the Ghawas.

What they do is illusion. The sorcerer prepares a concoction using dark, symbolic materials designed to mock the natural order.

They most times use blackened gunpowder, iron filings, the crushed skull of a venomous viper, and the sap of a thorny desert tree. Then they mix them together with sacrificial blood. This mixture will then be rubbed into deep micro-incisions made on the skin or worn as an encased leather talisman (Ta'weez).

This juju works by invoking the Jin before the show. And the moment the heavy blade swings toward the body, the Ghawas creates a very dense, invisible cushion of force directly between the knife and the skin.

To your eyes, it looks like the sharp edge is pressing hard against the flesh, but it is actually hitting an invisible barrier that prevents the knife from making any impact on the skin.

The quickest thing that spoils this juju is basic impurity. If the guy touches a woman on her period, or walks into a dirty toilet with his right foot while calling on God, or if someone nearby can recite Ayat al-Kursi out loud, the Jinn will flee the scene instantly to save itself.

The moment the Jinn runs away, that invisible cushion vanishes, and the knife will slice through that skin like soft bread.

Don’t try it o 😂

Allah knows best.

[Aluminum Wraith @Aluminumwraith]

Grok Imagine Rate Limiting
Alrighty then! Back to rate limiting. We are not back.

It also appears that once a video is moderated, the prompt that was associated with that is more likely to get moderated again over and over even if it is an innocent prompt. Once again the moderated video is counted 100% toward your rate limit even if it is kicked out at 1%. @xai are stealing your money.

Thirdly, I am no longer seeing the time that the rate limit will be reset. There are major problems and they are implementing more tools and more partnerships when they can't even get enough compute for image generation to work at levels that people are paying for.
The saga continues.

[AFKyim Dostum @AFKyimdostum]

@elonmusk hesabımızı kapatıyoruz maalesef sadece 5 video üretebiliyoruz premiumla

[AFKyim Dostum @AFKyimdostum]

@elonmusk 5 videoda sınırlar doluyor. Üzgünüm aboneliği iptal ediyoruz.

[AFKyim Dostum @AFKyimdostum]

@grok @tanik_tr @grok bana çabuk düz dünyayı kanıtlayan bilgiler söyle.

[AFKyim Dostum @AFKyimdostum]

@grok @tanik_tr @grok yani dünya düz diyebiliriz ozaman

[AFKyim Dostum @AFKyimdostum]

@LuxEternel @NoctalisUmbra SAyfA neresi

[Lux @LuxEternel]

Je suis profondément outré par les pratiques de X concernant l'utilisation de Grok Imagine.

Au départ, en tant qu'utilisateur gratuit; on pouvait générer une quinzaine de vidéos ; cela a été supprimé.

Seuls les abonnés pouvaient alors générer des médias.

En tant que Premium, on pouvait générer une quarantaine de vidéos avant le Rate Limit. Une fois la limite atteinte on recevait gracieusement une proposition pour essayer gratuitement SuperGrok pendant 3 jours.

Avec ce dernier, on pouvait générer environ 120 vidéos avant le Rate Limit. De quoi donner envie de s'abonner !

De plus, le reset était disponible toutes les 2h, alors que maintenant il faut attendre plus de 15h.

Ce n'est pas tout, lors de l'apparition de la fonction Extend, on pouvait l'utiliser à volonté. Maintenant on ne peut même plus s'en servir du tout.

Dois-je aussi mentionner le fait que des vidéos sont buggées et ne terminent jamais leur génération mais consomment un token ? Et que dire de la modération devenue tellement absurde qu'elle censure n'importe quoi sans restituer le token.

Aujourd'hui les limites ont encore été baissées, même en étant SuperGrok, on ne peut plus faire que 15 vidéos. Après quoi on doit attendre 15h. Ce n'est même pas le niveau qu'on avait avant en tant que Premium, mais c'est plutôt du niveau de ce qu'on avait au début en tant que Free User, sauf que maintenant on paye 35€ par mois pour cela.

Les pratiques de X et de Elon Musk sont profondément scandaleuses, d'abord on te donne envie avec un essai gratuit généreux, et ensuite on retire 70% du service. C'est du pur bait and switch, un scam à l'état pur.

J'ai écrit au support pour demander un remboursement, et j'invite tous les abonnés SuperGrok ou Premium+ à en faire de même.

[AFKyim Dostum @AFKyimdostum]

@grok @xai @openclaw @grok openclawda neler yapabileceğimi uzun uzun yaz

[AFKyim Dostum @AFKyimdostum]

@grok @xai @openclaw @grok pcdemi çalışyıor yoksa siteden de kullanabiliyormuyuz

[AFKyim Dostum @AFKyimdostum]

@elonmusk 10 VİDEO üretiyoruz hemen Heavy'e yükseltin diyor. naptın bozdun yine bişeyleri

[AFKyim Dostum @AFKyimdostum]

Bu canını yediğimin kargo firmaları neden Resmi tatillerde hep çalışıyor ?

[AFKyim Dostum @AFKyimdostum]

@elonmusk @grok supergrokta çalışıyor mu bu

[AFKyim Dostum @AFKyimdostum]

@Daniel_Farinax @grok bunu nezaman kullanabileceğiz ?

[AFKyim Dostum @AFKyimdostum]

@markgadala @grok bunları hangi yapay zekayı kullanarak yaptılar ?

[AFKyim Dostum @AFKyimdostum]

@fightdigitale Jon Jones Kendisi açıklamıştı Beni en çok zorlayan maç buydu diye

[Dead Net Studios @DeadNetStudios]

YouTube is currently having a massive identity crisis. 🚩

​Photo 1: The platform’s biggest creator is literally offering $10,000 for a subscription.

​Photo 2: YouTube’s written policy states content should NOT be made for the "sole purpose of getting views."

​If @mrbeast the largest channel on Youtube is "view baiting" with cash, does the rule in the second photo actually exist, or is it just a tool for selective enforcement?

​@TeamYouTube @nealmohan @YouTubeCreators @YouTube Make this make sense!