Qom X @QomX_io is now open.
Hybrid CEX/DEX that allows DeFi users to access through web3 using Tether $USDT from Ethereum and Binance Smart Chain networks to trade $QOM.
Alpha dex has $FUND $BABY $FATHER markets with more coming with the Launchpad.
https://t.co/WaQPfaWIDR
Forgot to mention QL1 blockchain which $QOM is native token.
BSC did not launch until 2 years after Binance was formed.
QL1 already exist, everything is ready.
https://t.co/WaQPfaWIDR
In the beginning, Binance had only offered a spot market with BTC, ETH, LTC, NEO, and BNB itself.
Everything else was planned after.
$QOMX has a working $QOM spot market, Alpha Dex, Launchpad, stable coin decentralized bridge.
Sounds pretty big to me, you can’t deny me.
Follow the path of $BNB and Binance
Held ICO on Ethereum.
Was exchange token at first
BSC launched a few years later and let to further adoption.
$QOM and Qom X are ahead of the game. Everything is built beforehand for adoption.
I have completed the backend development of the $QOM market CEX @QomX_io
This makes it fully dynamic to support deposit,withdraw and trading of other assets like $SHIB $ETH $BNB
I am now testing.
According to math, the Bitcoin market will continue to go down until Fall time. Early October.
Continue to build. Be relevant in next 3 years of bull run.
$QOM
Michael Saylor bought 843,706 Bitcoin
He sold 32 Bitcoin recently.
He is not teh reason for the market downturn, but his Ponzi is up regardless if price continues to fall
Max pain is coming.
$QOM is independent of any market right now since it’s only paired to Tether $USDT
Qom X Price Discrepancy & Arbitrage 101: Liquidity Pools vs Order Books
There’s currently a clear price gap between the Q/QOM LP pool on QomX Alpha DEX and the QomX CEX:
• DEX LP price: ~ 0.000000004 $Q per $QOM
• CEX highest bid: ~ 0.0000000014
Roughly 2.86× higher on the DEX pool right now.
This creates a potential arbitrage opportunity and a perfect real-world example of how DEX liquidity pools and CEX order books discover price differently.
Order Books on CEX (like QomX CEX)
Centralized exchanges use a live order book:
• Bids (buy orders) — stacked from highest price down. The highest bid (0.0000000014 here) is the best price sellers can hit immediately.
• Asks (sell orders) — stacked from lowest price up.
Price is set by matching overlapping buy & sell orders in real time.
Key traits:
• Visible depth at every price level
• Market makers tighten spreads
• Large orders can slip if the book is thin (you eat through multiple levels and get a worse average price)
• Highest bid = best immediate sell price on CEX
Liquidity Pools on DEX (like QomX Alpha DEX)
Most DEXes (including QomX’s) use Automated Market Makers (AMMs) with liquidity pools instead of order books.
Liquidity Providers (LPs) deposit both tokens of a pair ($Q stable + QOM) into a smart contract pool in equal value.
Price is calculated mathematically from the ratio of reserves in the pool (classic constant-product formula):
x × y = k
• No bids or asks.
• When you sell QOM into the pool, you increase the QOM reserve → the price of QOM moves against you (you get slightly less Q per token the more you sell).
• This is called slippage / price impact — bigger relative to pool size = worse execution.
LPs earn a share of every swap fee automatically. Anyone can add liquidity or swap permissionlessly.
The Arbitrage Opportunity Right Now
When the DEX pool prices QOM higher than the CEX bid level:
Traders can attempt to:
1. Buy QOM on the QomX CEX (watch the full order book — take asks or place bids near the current levels for best fill).
2. Transfer/bridge QOM to the DEX environment.
3. Sell into the Q/QOM LP pool on Alpha DEX at the higher ~0.000000004 price.
Profit = price difference minus all costs (CEX fees + withdrawal/bridge, DEX swap fee, gas, slippage on both sides, time risk).
What happens when arbs execute?
• More buying on CEX → CEX price tends to rise
• More selling into the DEX pool → pool price tends to fall (reserves shift)
• The two venues converge toward equilibrium.
Arbitrageurs are the invisible hand that keeps prices aligned across the hybrid ecosystem.
Create demand for $QOM
Right now you can buy in one of two ways.
1. Deposit usdt to @QomX_io CEX
2. Deposit usdt to Q Bridge and buy on the Qom X Alpha Dex in the Q/QOM LP pool.
In the future, your favorite memecoins will be paired to QOM on the CEX.
This is my vision, there are other community members who have their owns visions and are executing their will.
Join the people.
I am updating the QOM CEX backend.
There are over 200,000 lines of code and I need to check manually each one is correct after updating for new markets to be listed.
I don’t know when but shall stay with the motto SOON.
$SHIB $BNB $ETH
Why the QL1-Infinite Drive dual-chain architecture in the Cosmos ecosystem is one of the cleanest "sister chain" strategies in the space.
Clear Division of Roles:
QL1 = "Meme Coin Planet"
Personality: Wild, chaotic, fun, permissionless
Primary Use Case: High-volume meme trading, social experiments, spam-friendly micro-transactions, degen playground
Token: $QOM (ultra-low fees)
Infinite = "Hyperspace" Infrastructure Layer
Personality: Serious, robust, production-grade
Primary Use Case: DeFi, smart contracts, IBC mesh, bridges, staking derivatives, governance, launchpad
Tokens: $42 (staking + gas) + $FISH (rewards & incentives)
This separation isn't accidental — it's deliberate and smart.
QL1 stays extremely cheap and law-of-the-jungle style. No pressure to be "serious." It can be the chaotic meme engine that attracts eyeballs, liquidity, and new users who love the energy.
Infinite focuses on being the reliable backbone. Precompiles, deep liquidity pools, validator incentives, cross-chain tools, and long-term sovereignty mechanisms live here. It doesn't have to compete on meme volume or race to the bottom on fees.
How the Two Chains Complement Each Other:
1. Liquidity & Capital Flow
Memes and retail frenzy stay on QL1 where fees are dirt cheap and turnover is lightning fast. Serious capital and yield-seeking liquidity migrate to Infinite for deeper pools, better execution, and $FISH rewards.
The Stargate bridge acts as the connective tissue — capital can flow back and forth depending on market conditions. Bull market memes pump on QL1 → profits bridge to Infinite for yield → infrastructure gets stronger.
2. Developer Strategy
Meme creators, experimenters, and quick viral plays launch on QL1.
Ambitious teams building staking derivatives, advanced DeFi, cross-chain apps, or governance tools go to Infinite where the tooling and precompiles are superior.
This creates natural segmentation instead of forcing every project into one compromised environment.
3. Token Utility (Clean & Non-Overlapping)
$QOM = pure gas for the fun, high-velocity layer.
$42 = staking, governance, and economic security for the infrastructure layer.
$FISH = the incentive flywheel rewarding liquidity providers, node operators, and ecosystem participants (with potential bridge synergy to QL1).
Why This Structure Makes Sense Long-Term:
Most chains fall into the trap of one token trying to do everything — gas, staking, governance, memes, incentives — and ending up mediocre at all of them.
This setup avoids that entirely:
QL1 can remain hyper-cheap without token value pressure destroying the user experience.
Infinite can focus purely on building robust, credible infrastructure.
The bridge creates a beautiful flywheel: Meme volume & attention on QL1 → Capital flows to Infinite for yield → Stronger infrastructure attracts serious builders & TVL → Better tools & products → Even more activity back on QL1.
The close coordination between Infinite devs and early $FUND holders is another underrated advantage. It significantly reduces the risk of the two chains drifting apart or competing destructively.
Bottom Line:
QL1 as the super-cheap meme planet and Infinite as the serious hyperspace infrastructure chain is a coherent, logical, and elegant split. It plays to each chain’s natural strengths instead of fighting them.
If the Stargate bridge delivers smooth UX and $FISH incentives are well-calibrated, the combined ecosystem could become quite powerful — giving holders exposure to both the chaotic fun/volume upside and the real utility/infrastructure upside.
This is how you design for different user personas and market cycles at the same time.
https://t.co/qNrpsXhC0q https://t.co/O7nUJWQMXz
VC funding for L1s was solid in 2025 (~$1.3B in one tally) but cooled sharply in 2026.
Recent commentary notes capital shifting away from “faster/cheaper me-too L1s” toward infrastructure with clear moats, revenue, stablecoins, RWAs, and compliance.
Even when having infrastructure; VC’s still rugged chains like
berachain, Solana, and Monad.
$QOM has infrastructure, has visions, is SPECIAL. The people control it.
If your not building for QL1,
You must work to get new users of $QOM
We’re at the stage where you don’t have the luxury to sit back. There is so much potential, and time is the most valuable asset.
Don’t squander your opportunity.