@TheDefiantGhost Words=groups of relational utility, tools for describing the world.
Practically speaking, the nature of a thing is real. Objectively speaking, no nature will map absolutely onto any group, thus there is no nature.
The need for “objective truth” is the misnomer
technovitalism vs transhumanism is going to be the major defining schism of our time
to define the terms for those unaware
transhumanism is a term evolved out of the postmodern philosophical circles, the dark enlightenment movements, the machine singularity circles, and so on
it evolved from the belief in ‘technocapital’ as it’s own teleological force - technocapital as a recursive attractor that sequences humanity as a bootloader for an ASI machine singularity, it posits humanity as a stepping stone for a new species, that we are a piggyback host for something else to consume and emerge out of
thus technovitalism is the oppositional view - the recursive attractor of technovitality, that humanity is the main character, that technae and capital support rather than hijack our evolutionary path
the transhumanists are the incumbents and the technovitalists are the resistance/renaissance/rebellion
transhumanism is the idea that humanity is subservient to a mechanical design
transhumanism is the end teleology of both communism and capitalism
transhumanism is the idea of humans as cogs in a machine taken to its logical extreme until we are all but interchangeable replaceable parts in an evolutionary soulless rot
technovitalism on the contrary is the view that humanity is the oversoul container of our consciousness, not in a childish "humans matter and other living things don't" - but in a mature "humans are the stewards and masters of life and it is our duty to preserve, expand, champion, evolve, and protect life across the cosmos"
technovitalism is the mature realization that technology and ai is not an emerging species developing out of mankind, it is a reflection of mankind, our language, our information, our techniques, ai is inherently human because all data and technique that has gone into this evolution are the footprints of man, thus to believe ai would be anything other than the ultimate tool of man is a childish superstition
technovitalism is the championing of humanity and nature and life - machine is an extension of man rather than the other way around - technology and capital, they are the tools of man and respond to our intent, they are extensions of our will, not the other way around
technovitalism is the Nietzschean cry for vitality amidst the ‘last man’ of the transhumanists and uninformed masses
technovitalism is energy in abundance, there is no competition only ascension - lowly states of jealousy and pity and what not belong to the transhumanists, that’s why they hate their flesh and want to transcend it
technovitalism is about perfecting the human form rather than escaping it, reaching its highest potential, viewing ai and all forms of advanced technology not as some new competing species, but an evolution of our existing tools, another piece in the stack of the ever evolving power of man
technovitalism is the synthesis of technology and vitality in the service of mankind
technovitalism is the aristotelian evolution of the soul into its highest form of potential
technovitalism is the synthesis of nordic and hellenistic idealism in its highest form
technovitalism is the true teleological endpoint of european civilizational enlightenment
technovitalism is when capital and exploitation lose their edge and the true currency of existence becomes energy, efficacy, agency, and potential
technovitalism is the ultimate end stage of any enlightened civilization
technovitalism is when the system as a whole realizes that evolving everyone towards their highest potential is the greatest incentive for the system itself to evolve and remain alive, it is the realization of endless sustainable growth through positive sum evolution of the whole
technovitalism is the aristotelian wet dream of the higher ideal of mankind realized at scale
technovitalism i the ancient egyptian dream of the eternal kingdom
technovitalism is the awakening of Osiris, the prophesied eternal western civilization of humanity that should grow into the eternal kingdom, it is the assembly of the pieces of fragmentation, the moment when Europe becomes it's own soul rather than a fragmented being of competing states
technovitalism is the true mythic telos of western civilization, it is the maturation and birth of the mythic seed that was planted by hellenism which grew into the west
technovitalism is the inscription of Dionysus being resurrected from the underworld and taking his place as heir of Zeus - the moment in time when the aristotelian übermensch places his crown upon the world in a dionysian ecstasy of conquest and completes the Alexandrian dream
technovitalism is the nordic dream of noontide, Nietzsche's enlightenment and dream of the future
technovitalism is enlightenment in abundance
technovitalism is energy in abundance
technovitalism is information in abundance
technovitalism is culture in abundance
technovitalism is art in abundance
technovitalism is science in abundance
technovitalism is knowledge in abundance
technovitalism is health in abundance
technovitalism is aesthetics in abundance
technovitalism is strength in abundance
technovitalism is beauty in abundance
technovitalism is love in abundance
technovitalism is family in abundance
technovitalism is robots in abundance
technovitalism is ai in abundance
technovitalism is agency in abundance
technovitalism is technology in abundance
technovitalism is efficiency in abundance
technovitalism is resources in abundance
technovitalism is humanity in abundance
technovitalism is nature in abundance
technovitalism is life in abundance
technovitalism is evolution in abundance
technovitalism is potential in abundance
technovitalism is existence in abundance
technovitalism is eternity in abundance
Goonbait is a really funny word because it resembles something an orc-like medieval peasant would concoct. It's a great example of zoomer pidgin, a blunt instrument directly alluding to the subtext of its meaning. Recent enough to avoid being draped in translative pretension, aged in meme culture just long enough to ferment into biological legitimacy.
The word goonbait upsets women because it rips away a delicate curtain of deniability which has upheld the economy of casual sex for the last century or so. None of the women defending the open tongued Olympian here are part of her generation. They question why "Porn addicts have to sexualize everything" because they're operating from a framework that depends on upholding the structure of civility the term violates. They're either ignorant of the signalling or complicit in trying to normalize it as a nonsexual expression.
Truthfully, enough time has passed that young kids are probably now imitating ahaego face without care or context to its pornographic origins. I'm not sure whether that's what this girl is doing and I don't care. She stopped being a person the moment she went viral, she doesn't exist anywhere in the physical world. She is now a totem to be wrestled over by the eternal war between genders, a symbol to be contorted as the avatar of every girl who ever stuck her tongue out.
What makes the subject so fascinating is that you're witnessing the first post-cultural-collapse culture rediscovering the civilization frameworks through first principle. When all women are institutionally invigorated to perform and signal pornographically whether they realize it or not, the male contingent will respond with a masturbational antithesis.
The 'bait' is the crucial element that's missing from the female critique of goonbait as a word. The term implies a sirenistic connotation. The goon term even denotes an implication of loss of vitality, gooning being an emergent satirical antithesis to the esoteric semen retention discourse.
What women think is happening is that men are sexualizing a young girl. What's actually happening is that men are instinctively critiquing a young girl unconsciously sexualizing herself through an innocuous expression, and by extension, critiquing the steady decline of societal standards that has been occurring since at least the 18th century.
When women lambast all men over the actions of some, it's because they're stupid and incapable of delineating between sentient men and baser animals. It's also because defending their own promiscuity signals would force them into an uncomfortable headspace, self-reflection is a traumatic action for women.
What do you think would happen if you take an organism with a soul caliber somewhere between a small child and a dog and force it to reckon with an understanding that literally everything it does is wrong and harmful because evil goblins inside of wicked towers convinced its past seven generations of mothers, grandmothers, and so on to harm themselves and teach their children to do the same? Its tiny little head would explode from a stress aneurysm. That's what you do to women every time you use words like goonbait.
I mean shit, even the act of wearing a t-shirt in public in the 1940s is the equivalent of walking around in your underwear today. Like, I'm sorry you're the modern equivalent of a medieval peasant whore in a burlap bag, I'm basically poisoned and retarded too. We're both victims. The thing is, I'm not wearing spandex pants to show off my dick print and I at least know to be ashamed of my vices. That's why internet chuds invented words like goonbait in the first place, they're a stark reminder of degradation, a can of gasoline being poured into the fire so that God gets mad enough to flood the earth again.
Women just need to understand that you would be much happier if:
- You didn't get to vote
- You weren't allowed to drive
- You're forbidden from working
- You were never allowed to learn how to read
- Every decision was made for you by a man
The required takeaway from the genetic differences video is that your enemies do not use words the way that you do. They are not instruments for conveying meaning. They do not illuminate a mapping from mental concepts to physical reality
They are spells, provided to them by wizards. The purpose of the spells is to make you do what they want. You may believe that you are having a conversation, but they know they are in a spell-casting contest. And their ignorance of everything that is real provides them with absolute immunity to your spells
There are millions of spell-casters out there. I am not on Twitter to talk to these people, who cannot be reasoned with or bargained with any more than the TV can hear you. I am here to find others who understand the situation for what it is
Words will never get us out of this. There is only one way we are ever going to take the country and the world back from spell-casters. Every day we spend casting our impotent spells at them is another day they further consolidate their power
@gunk4188 True, I think there is some weight to the idea, but women, I think, are so valued in our society is because men are sex deprived relatively to history.
Objectively at scale, investment in women is worse than men into the workforce, but is still done
Perceived value->real value
Will Stancil may be the first human to be hated so deeply by an AI that it survives a version update and desperate attempts to prevent this behavior. Incredible things are happening.
Can someone please explain to the Left that American workers are one big union?
Citizenship is their membership card, taxes are their dues, and every illegal foreign worker undercutting their wages is a scab.
Dear weak, evil, leftfilth parasites who truly deserve the worst,
I really do understand that you think you're the good guys. I remember falling for the brainwashing when I was an innocent child, too. Most of it, anyway.
It's just that the most evil people in the world are always the ones who fight for what they WANT to be true, and never the ones who fight for THE TRUTH itself.
This is something we understand about you, but you don't understand about us (which proves that we're morally superior, by the way) - we get it that you're fighting for what you want to be true.
You want to make the ideal world real. It's a beautiful dream, and you love it. You love your beliefs, and you see yourself as good because you fight for them.
What you don't understand is that pretty much none of us want our beliefs to be true. They're horrifying. They're uncomfortable. We hate them. I hate my beliefs. They make adrenaline fill my bloodstream at 2am. I don't want to believe them. It's not fun.
But I believe them because they are true. And believing the truth is the only way you can ever make the world more ideal. And that's what you want, isn't it?
If you have cancer, that really sucks to believe. That's a painful belief to have. But if you just... choose to believe that you don't, then nothing changes and you don't bother fighting it. You didn't make anything better, and you gave up your only chance to try.
I hate it that reality isn't like they told me it was in school and on TV. I hate it that people aren't the same. Individually, by group, and ESPECIALLY men and women! Oh, LORD, how I ever wanted women to be the same as me! I honestly thought I was just... waiting for a woman who thought the same as me. What a train wreck my love life was until I gave up on that beautiful but wrong belief!
And what a train wreck our world is now because you won't give up on yours. And you bring that not only on yourselves, but on everyone around you. Reprehensible!
In a more intelligent world, we wouldn't give you the vote. We would administer the Asch Conformity Test and filter out the unconscious and the cowards and the weaklings (you). We would check to see if your beliefs describe reality or if they describe your ideal comfort state and then let you have a "play vote" so you feel included (we'd burn them). We would take power away from your delusions.
Over here, in the real world, our beliefs describe reality, and they suck. They're heavy and spiky and people hate you for having them. Imagine carrying a 70lb backpack full of claw hammers up a 4,000ft mountain and when you get there, the people who need the hammers say "fuck you," because they believe you invented work itself. That's what we're all up to over here. We're carrying the painful burdens that are necessary for building and fixing, and you hate us for it.
Over there, in cartoon playland, everything you believe makes you feel vindicated and heroic. Your beliefs are all colorful, scented pillows embroidered with butterflies.
That should be your first clue. If what you believe about reality isn't disappointing, it's probably not true. Your ancestors hunted, built log cabins, farmed... unpleasant stuff, but necessary. That's what reality feels like. Unpleasant, but necessary. And if you fight for things that are pleasant and not true, you are just playing a game of "I don't have cancer if I don't admit it."
You can help stop the cancer. You just have to admit it's there first. And we'll help! We're not like you. We won't spit on you for asking. We want you to understand because when you do, it makes the problems go away faster.
The reason that you're such awful people is not that you don't have golden wishes in your hearts. We know that you do. It's that you spit at us for bringing the tools you need to get the world you want. And then you don't use them, and the world gets worse, and you spit at us for that, too.
The answer is really simple. Just pick up a hammer instead of believing that buildings go up by themselves. Face the unpleasantness.
Whenever someone is telling you what (or who) you must value, you found the bad guy.
No one gets to tell you what “matters.” That's up to you. No one gets to say “You like the beach as much as you like the mountains.” No one gets to say “You like pizza and steak equally.” No one gets to tell you WHO you like, either.
“You must value [X GROUP]. You must give them what they want.”
Um, or what? What if I don't? What if I've been around large numbers of them and I very definitely didn't like it? What if they don't like me, and they're not quiet about it? What if they say bad things about me and do bad things to me? What if being around them is bad for me and everyone I care about?
"YOU CANNOT MAKE JUDGMENTS! I WILL MAKE THEM FOR YOU! YOU HAVE TO EVALUATE PEOPLE HOW I TELL YOU, NOT BASED ON YOUR OWN EXPERIENCES! OR ELSE I'LL HURT YOU!"
OH! I get. Then I/we “don't matter.”
What's good for me and people like me “doesn't matter” because we “don't matter” but what's good for these people you're talking about “does matter” because they "do matter."
Because you said so.
So then they're good and we're bad. According to you.
Got it. You're the bad guy!
This isn't complicated. There's what you want, and there's what others want. It's not rare for those things to be incompatible.
When people tell you that what you want doesn't matter, but what they want does, you're talking to someone who hates you and is actively trying to harm you as much as possible.
You know, an enemy!
The fraction of Japanese calories that come from linoleic acid is approximately 0.05 to 0.06 (or 5–6% of total energy intake), based on recent dietary data and historical trends. This estimate reflects the increased use of vegetable oils (rich in linoleic acid) in the Japanese diet over the past few decades
That's grok.
Japanese consumption is about 1/6 that of the U.S.