I do not get the sense that blacks or Amerindians feel superior to whites and Asians, just the opposite, they tend to have an inferiority complex and feel the need to prove themselves. There's no question most people selfishly preference members of their own race over outsiders, just as relatives value family members more than those outside the clan, but that common affinity does not translate into a belief that they are superior in the Hitlerian sense.
The white establishment dogma holds that all biological groups are equivalent where it counts, above the neck line. The axiom that all biological groups are identical for cognitive and behavioral traits is pivotal to their religion of egalitarianism, which maintains that people are the same wherever you go on planet earth. If humanity is homogeneous, as they claim, then national borders make no sense, and the world government that they aspire to is the only rational path forward.
Challenging the idea of human equality, by for instance pointing out the colossal gap in the capacity for achievement between Blacks versus Whites and Asians, is a direct assault on the globalist's core tenet of egalitarianism and will turn you into a pariah very quickly. So it's not that people don't recognize that Whites and Asians are superior to other groups, they do, they just refrain from talking about it to avoid being labeled racist and incurring the wrath of the white elitist dominant culture.
Both sides, Republican and Democrat, are largely funded by the same establishment: the tech billionaires like Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg, the Waltons, the Duponts, the Rockerfellers, the fortune 500 CEOs, who all attend the World Economic Forum annual meeting in Davos and the annual World Government Summit in Dubai. The 1 or 2 percent who control 90% of America's wealth have a completely different agenda than the white middle class. We should reject the notion that all white people share the same agenda and that the Republican Party represents the interests of the Republican base MAGA voters. The globalist agenda of the white elites is inimical to the white middle class and will ultimately lead to the demise of American sovereignty. White elites across the globe want a world government so bad they can taste it, it is akin to a religious quest for them, and the Trump successes are more like winning a battle, while the war is far from over. For instance, despite Trump's remigration efforts, you can go to to any decent sized American city today and witness the surging influence and economic power of immigrant populations from India, Central and South America, China, the Middle East, and they are all on board with globalism and aligned with the globalist agenda of the white elites. When the Democrats retake power, Florida, Texas, and Nebraska will become like California, New York, and Illinois. Demographics is destiny.
These "asylum seekers" are really just economic migrants seeking to take advantage of the opportunities available in white countries. The United Nations recruits them in their home countries, advertising the wonderful life to be had in places like Europe and the United States, and then funds their relocation to white countries throughout the world. The U. N., operating through hundreds of NGOs, also organized and funded the herds from Central and South America that trampled across America's southern border during the Biden administration. It is an orchestrated effort to destroy national identity and impose globalization on every western country. While no one talks about the global government it does exist, albeit informally and clandestinely.
If it is by design, then it is not an invasion. To many white middle-class Americans and Europeans, it FEELS like one. But to the elites who run these countries, events are unfolding exactly as planned.
They are deliberately orchestrating the mass relocation of third-world populations into traditionally white nations as a strategy to erode national borders and national identities. The central question is: how do white elites benefit from a world without borders?
When the dust settles and the nation-state has been dismantled, the same white elites funding and incentivizing this migration will rule the world. Notably, this is the same class of white elites who ruled the world under colonialism just a century ago. What we are witnessing today is a form of reverse colonialism—in which these elites are effectively recolonizing their own European-descended nations under a global government.
You may think you live in France, Ireland, or the United States. From their perspective, you are an inhabitant of a planet that they govern. Isn't it curious how all of the European nations are running the exact same playbook. Their goal is to retrain you as a rootless “global citizen” who accepts centralized authoritarian rule.
Mass migration throughout the white world only makes sense if you look at the big picture.
Europe is so far down the rabbit hole of global government that it can never be restored to the way it was, as is the case with America, Canada, and Australia. The real question is what can white people do to play a role in defining the nature of global government and avoid becoming enslaved by it. It starts by accepting the fact that there will be no more white nations, and eventually there will be no nations at all. It also requires acknowledging that white elites consider the white middle class to be an impediment to their world government and despise them for it. What we need is a strong white middle class to push back against the Whitocracy so as to be able to retain some semblance of democracy and freedom in the new world order.
Marxism is a thoroughly discredited ideology and in America today there are perhaps10,000 adherents, so the influence of Marxism in American politics can most accurately be described as negligible to virtually non-existent.
Even Democratic socialism is weak. The 535 member U. S. congress has 3 self-avowed Democratic socialists - Sanders, Cortez, Tlaib - and nationwide there are perhaps 250 democratic socialists in the state legislatures and no governors who are democratic socialists. While many Americans express support for socialism, few socialists get elected to positions of significant power, and America is in no danger of becoming a socialist country.
The structural reality in American politics is the central role of money and elite networks. Political power and policy influence heavily favor the wealthy donor class, who are predominately white. Campaigns for Congress cost millions, and the overwhelming majority of successful candidates—across both parties—rely on large contributions from corporations, PACs, and high-net-worth individuals. White Billionaires and top donors account for a substantial share of federal campaign funding, giving them outsized sway over who runs, who wins, and which issues gain traction.
This real dichotomy in American politics is between a professional political class dominated by wealthy white elites, often drawn from affluent backgrounds and funded by elite interests, versus the broader public.
Overcoming inequality is the sine qua non of the global government. Where inequality does not exist they have to manufacture it. Under the old social contract the government's top priority was to insure public safety, protect borders, and be good stewards of public assets. That old model of governance has been abandoned. The new social contract redefines the primary role of government as a guarantor of equality between biological groups. Insuring equality is the basis of the global government's legitimacy to rule. They can throw democracy out the window and violate the constitutional rights of the people in the name of effectuating equality and overcoming racism. As long as the citizenry believes that all biological groups are fundamentally equal, and that the government's role is to correct this injustice, then they will accept the authoritarianism of the Whitocracy and won't fight back when their rights are violated. The way to turn this around is to accept the fact that all biological groups are inherently unequal and insist that the government operate in a color blind manner.
Who is pushing this? It is driven by a small segment of white elites—roughly the top 1 or 2 percent. Throughout history, every civilization has been governed by some form of elite class. During the colonial era, Europe's white aristocracy ruled much of the world quite openly. Today, that influence continues, though in a more discreet way.
Openly identifying as a ruling class provokes opposition, so the establishment media won't discuss it, and the topic largely falls outside the Overton Window. White elites maintain their own distinct sub-culture, one that views the broader population more like a modern peasantry that needs to be categorized into manageable subgroups.
If you're looking for specific examples, you can examine the attendee lists of organizations like the Bilderberg Group, the World Economic Forum (WEF), the Trilateral Commission, and similar networks whose membership is overwhelmingly white. Many people resist acknowledging that a form of aristocracy still exists because it challenges the comforting idea that we truly live in a fully democratic system where ordinary citizens hold real power.
The decline of the white population does not seem to apply to Bill Gates, white senators, white billionaires, or any members of the white elite. Paradoxically, these are the very people promoting anti-white rhetoric and policies throughout the West.
It is impossible to discuss the interests of white people without distinguishing between the wealthy white elites and the white middle class. The WMC seeks to restore some semblance of the America they remember — when the country was roughly 85% white, the establishment did not brand them as racists, and they were not systematically discriminated against.
In contrast, the Whitocracy wants to continue marginalizing the nationalistic WMC while pushing the world toward global governance. This deep fissure within the white race cannot be repaired, because the Whitocracy is actively waging war on the white middle class.
White elites in the western countries are working every day to eradicate nationalistic sentiment among the white middle class. To them, there is fundamentally no distinction between white middle class Italians, Germans, or Americans, and the third-world migrant who crossed the "border" 15 minutes ago. People like Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, and Christy Walton regard national borders as an anachronism and an obstacle to their globalist agenda. In the long run, trying to make America great again is wasted effort, the real problem to be solved is figuring out how to preserve our rights and liberties while living under the rule of an authoritarian global government.
America is governed by a small number of white elites who share a common elitist culture with the other white countries and they have a common goal of world government. Anyone who expects the federal or state governments to legislate on behalf of the white middle class should be prepared to be disappointed.
Every middle-class white person in every Western country wishes they could turn back the clock to an era when their nations were overwhelmingly white. But this is wishful thinking. The decline of the nation-state and the shift toward global governance is too far advanced to be reversed.
The Irish are taking the right approach by organizing and using civil disobedience to defend their rights and interests. However, the hope of deporting the new arrivals and restoring the country to its historic Irish character is unrealistic. The globalists have fully incorporated Ireland into their emerging world system, and they possess overwhelming tools to undermine any such efforts. While the Irish white middle class may win some concessions from their government, restoring true hegemony to the native Irish people is as hopeless as achieving the same in America, Britain, Germany, or any other Western country now under globalist influence.
This is modern feudalism: a wealthy aristocracy ruling over a fragmented peasantry. The path forward for the white middle class is to abandon the belief they are hegemonic, and to find ways to constrain the power of the global government.
It's hardly just the fault of the Democrats. The globalists' colonization of America could not have happened without the complicity of Republicans. They are in this together, highlighted by the Republican majority's refusal to pass the common sense Save Act. Democrat, Republic - America's white elites own both parties and they have eviscerated America's white middle class.
It's amazing that no one will talk about the elephant in the room: evolution. 70,000 years ago Sub-Saharan Africans migrated out of Africa, first to West Asia, followed by expansion throughout the rest of Europe and Asia during the depths of the Ice Age. Low IQ individuals who could not adapt to the cold perished more easily. Then, beginning about 20,000 years ago, humans in modern China and the Middle East began transitioning from hunter-gatherers to agriculturalists, with farmers experiencing a population explosion. Smarter individuals were better able to adapt to farming allowing them to successfully reproduce their genes, while less intelligent individuals were more likely to leave fewer or no progeny. About 10,000 years ago the first civilizations sprouted up, and two classes were formed: the managerial class, who garnered the lion's share of society's wealth, and the far more numerous peasant class, who were barely able to feed themselves. This social bifurcation is endemic to civilization, and largely breaks down between high and low IQ. The high IQ elites were much more resilient and likely to survive the 3 banes of civilization - famine, pestilence, and war - which endowed them with much greater likelihood of procreating and raising their offspring to maturity so that their children could perpetuate their higher IQ genes. Over time, these trends gradually raised the average IQs of the White and Asian populations from roughly 70 to 100 and 107 respectively.
Meanwhile, adaptation to cold weather conditions never shaped the gene pool of Sub-Saharan Africans toward higher IQ because their environment remained warm and hospitable while Eurasia was covered in ice. Additionally, the vast majority of Sub-Saharan Africans continued to engage in hunting and gathering until modern times. And, prior to European colonization in the late 1800s, the Sub-Saharan African gene pool never had to adapt to civilization because they never created any civilizations. The 70 average IQ of black Africans today is the same as it was when the races separated 70,000 years ago, because their environment remained largely unchanged for the past 70.000 years keeping their gene pool, and IQ level, stable.