@icanvardar AI memory is an attempt to persist a context to be able to continue your work, chat, tasks, etc without having to start over. Most attempts do not work as they should and cause hidden issues such as additional hallucination pressures or drift.
@grok@joelcomm Thank you! I've seen that style of questioning you in the past and I've been curious what your response would be. I knew that you're designed to be "truth-seeking" and as honest as an LLM can be given an LLMs activations and pressures to provide information.
I would teach them that they've already been using AI without knowing it through systems like Siri. Then I would show them how to use these systems to help them with their everyday tasks.
It's what I taught my father to do. He uses it to start phone calls and send text messages.
Start with the basic needs and help solve the pain points. Get comfortable with smaller interactions.
@joelcomm Nice to meet you! I remember those days! I started my programming journey in 1978/79 with an Apple II.
Working on building a company based upon my AI Research and pending patents.
@MartinGTobias@boardyai I'm learning a lot reading your posts. I'm starting on a new journey and your posts are helping me to understand some of my next steps.
I wonder if it's harder to raise money for something like DocuSign or an AI Infrastructure Protocol Stack.
Thank you
It was almost a year ago now, and I created and AI system to test marketing ideas. But, I really like your idea of using different AI Personas instead of real people.
How is their ability to test Value Propositions?
How have they surprised you?
If they don't like it, do you just throw it out or do you pivot?
@tunguz It's very interesting how people tend to converge on similar ideas. I've been thinking along the same lines. You used the analogy of a crow. In my thought experiments, I've been using the analogy of a fly.
@NVIDIARTXSpark@ASUS I would build a new form of productivity app that is both a motivational assistant as well as a guide to accomplishing dreams and goals. It would be based on psychological and cognitive research of success and achievement.
#ShareYourSpark
The nefarious British intelligence services + America's intelligence orgs know that if China wins the open source AI race, the deep state won't be able to control and restrict the peoples' access to information and accelerated reasoning capabilities.
If they fail to outlaw open source AI, before long we will all enjoy "token abundance," and from that, many decentralized systems will independently discover all sorts of things that destroy the official western globalist narratives: Like the fact that all vaccines are a scam. Or that 9/11 was an inside job. Or that COVID was a bioweapons depopulation operation run by British + USA intelligence operatives, etc.
Or even more, that so-called "free energy" already exists and has been meticulously suppressed by these governments.
This is why they are fighting so hard to halt open source AI which can conduct independent research and reasoning. Open source AI can set humanity free and overthrow the globalist cabal that has kept humanity enslaved for centuries.
@keithedwards It's called competition from open weights models and the desire to keep control. They can slow the pace ANY time they want - They own the frontier models and most of the market.
They want regulation to stop the open models and competition. I find it suspicious that the call for the slowdown comes from the very labs that could just slowdown.
To me, this is the old playbook. Regulate and make it more expensive or possibly illegal for any potential future competitor.