Holy sh*t, Opus 5.5 just made After Effects look ancient
No FL Studio. No Logic Pro. Not one sample
I gave it one idea and it made everything. The beat, the 3D scene and the ducks playing it
Every time a duck lands you hear it. Kick, clap, hats, bass, melody
This is f*cking insane…
Sound on and watch till the end ↓
Opus 5.5 can make a video
The hard part is making the next one better
That takes a studio, not a prompt
I broke down how to build it ↓ https://t.co/EXinI060Cr
A 23-YEAR-OLD CLAIMS 240 CLAUDE CODE AGENTS DID A $175K ANALYST'S JOB IN ONE AFTERNOON. THE F*CKING TRICK IS ONE LOOP
his post this week:
> 10 scouts, 9 extractors, 8 cross-checkers, 6 reconcilers, 3 judges
> 120 company filings
> every claim held against the exact source page
> anything that doesn't match goes back as "rewrite"
can't verify the kid. the loop is real and you can build it tonight
the rule underneath ↓ an agent never grades its own work
now point it at earnings season
your bot reads a press release, grabs "revenue up 12%" and trades it. one wrong number and you just bought a headline that never existed
the split:
→ the big model writes every claim with a page number
→ a cheap model opens that exact page and checks it
→ mismatch = rewrite, never a trade
→ only claims that survive both reach your signals
you only step in three times:
→ when a claim bounces twice
→ when the filing and the press release disagree
→ before anything goes near real money
the big model writes. the cheap one checks. nothing trades unverified
paste this into Claude Code ↓
"Build earnings_check.py:
1. Pull the latest 10-Q and earnings press release for [ticker] from SEC EDGAR.
2. Have Opus extract every number (revenue, EPS, margins, guidance) with the exact page it came from.
3. Have Haiku open that page and confirm each number. Mismatch → send back as rewrite.
4. Loop until every claim matches, max 3 passes. Log every bounce to verify.log.
5. Write only verified claims to signals.csv. Paper only, no orders.
Show me the code first. Don't run anything until I say go."
one of these every night. tomorrow's builds on this one
CLAUDE IS INSANE AT DESIGN. BUT CHATGPT IS 7X CHEAPER
Asked Claude Opus 5.5 (left) and ChatGPT (right) for a launch page for a flying car.
ChatGPT: ~$0.03, done in 1:30. Claude: ~$0.20, done in 3 min.
ChatGPT gave me a clean dark template. Fine.
Claude gave me a 3D car that actually drives, lifts off and flies above the clouds. Plus a working altimeter and a paint studio that recolors it live.
7x the price. Way more than 7x the page.
Which one would you ship?
This model is insane at design. And 88x cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on my test!
I asked M3.1 Flash (left) and Opus 5.5 (right) to build me a landing page for a hardware device launch.
MiniMax cost just $0.014 vs $1.22 for Opus, while being 4x faster and more token efficient.
WHAT THE F*CK IS INSIDE THIS TESLA??
No jet engine.
No fuel tank.
No wings.
And it still flies.
So I X-rayed it 👇
- carbon fiber tanks in every empty space
-600 liters of compressed air
-10 thrusters that blast it out
- air goes down, car goes up
That’s it. It literally flies on the same thing you breathe
The only thing nobody knows yet: how long it can stay up there.
Would you ride it?
chatgpt doesn’t know what a car looks like
asked both to build a jelly g-wagon
-opus: real car that explodes into jelly pieces
-chatgpt: red bricks and 4 wheels
what exactly is chatgpt charging 2x for?