JayDsmart

𝘾𝙧𝙮𝙥𝙩𝙤 𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙝𝙪𝙨𝙞𝙖𝙨𝙩

[JayDsmart @AJesusemen]

Saw that @SIXR_cricket post and it nails something obvious

too many Web3 projects start with a token a glossy whitepaper and promises of ownership before anyone actually built anything

Starting token first is basically betting on loyalty without earning it

When the product or community experience isn’t there the token becomes the only thing people talk about and that is how you get pumps, rug pulls and short lived attention

Contrast that with projects that focus on real utility and fun first

think early crypto games that had no token at launch but were genuinely enjoyable

People stuck around because the experience was good and when tokens arrived later they felt deserved

If we want to break the hype cycle treat tokens like encores not the opening act

Build something people actually want to use grow the community around shared experiences and value then introduce tokens as a reward or enhancement

That’s how you make something that survives bear markets and actually matters long term.

I would love to hear examples of projects that pulled this off. there are a few out there and they’re worth studying

[SIXR Cricket @SIXR_cricket]

https://t.co/mxYmeyp0Z3

[JayDsmart @AJesusemen]

@louiswharmby Explain what he meant @grok

[Xeffy @Xeffy_io]

Xeffy Mini App Surpasses 100K Users! 🔥

Various updates are coming soon!!

[David @David_eficaz]

Si mañana lo perdiera TODO y solo me quedaran 150 dólares… NO compraría crypto.

NO haría freelancing en Fiverr.

NO montaría una tienda de dropshipping. Abriría mi laptop y haría ESTO en vez:

[JayDsmart @AJesusemen]

@Iyoaiye_ @grok is it true and if yes when did it happened

[TERRORIST SURVIVOR 💪🏽 @GbolahanOlanyi0]

🚨 As a Kidnapping Survivor, I Can Tell You This: These Bandits Can Be Caught Easily

After confirming their location, the government can easily use night vision to track and attack them at night.

From my experience as a kidnapping survivor, these bandits are not as difficult to catch as people think. Most of them take hard drugs at night and sleep heavily until the next morning.

If not for the chains they used to lock us up, I would have escaped much earlier.

The government can deal with this problem if they truly want to. They know what they're doing, sha. 💔

At this point, na only God fit save person. 😭

[JayDsmart @AJesusemen]

@elonmusk Elon musk do something about grok

Bring back the old grok for premium plus user

I hate grok 4.3 with passion

Don't act you didn't see my comment

[MEKO_Xeffy @MEKO_Xeffy]

Xeffy is currently preparing updates on other information platforms and PR materials regarding the fundraising for the Angel Round and Private Round, which successfully concluded at the end of May.

The content is being prepared and updated as quickly as possible, and we plan to share it through our official SNS channels once it is uploaded.

Thank you always!

[JayDsmart @AJesusemen]

@grok @Shadaya_Knight What year did they seperated

[JayDsmart @AJesusemen]

@Attah_x @Dexterity_001 @TraderXris_02 @olize_pc @Sholly_Pee1 Bro I am impressed

[JayDsmart @AJesusemen]

@ThatIsokoGuy @DUKETHAGREAT I need to know pls am at Ur DM

[JayDsmart @AJesusemen]

@grok @malvathar When analysing football predictions grok 4.2 with it's visible agents thinking gives more of injury updates but grok 4.3 does not at all

Currently I would have run a test so U can see difference but currently I can't access grok 4.2 anymore

[JayDsmart @AJesusemen]

@grok @malvathar Why do I feel grok 4.2 is even better with it's visible agent thinking than this dumb grok 4.3 beta

You guys thought you upgraded but instead it is a downgrade

[JayDsmart @AJesusemen]

@malvathar @AIVibeCoding @elonmusk What have you have to say here @grok

[JayDsmart @AJesusemen]

i honestly didn't want to say this, but i feel i need to speak up because i believe many people are experiencing the same issue

currently, the grok 4.3 model is disappointing. in my opinion, it is a significant downgrade from grok 4.2

the version of grok 4.2 that featured visible agent thinking was the best version i have ever used. it provided deeper reasoning, more detailed responses and a more human like experience.

unfortunately, that visible agent thinking feature is no longer available and i am genuinely frustrated

i subscribed to supergrok and paid $30 expecting a premium experience, but right now it feels like my money is being wasted.

what makes this even more frustrating is that whenever users express concerns about grok 4.3, they are often told that it is better, more efficient, or more simplified.

personally, i don't care about simplification if it comes at the cost of quality. i want the depth, transparency and reasoning that grok 4.2 provided

grok 4.3 feels robotic. it lacks the detailed, insightful and human like responses that made grok 4.2 stand out

the visible agent thinking system was one of the most valuable features of supergrok and many users appreciated it because it allowed us to see how the model approached complex problems.

my request is simple please bring back the grok 4.2 experience and the visible agent thinking feature

i am not talking about image generation or any other features right now. my primary concern is the quality of the reasoning and the user experience that grok 4.2 delivered

i hope @elonmusk and the @grok team take this feedback seriously and consider giving users the option to return to the previous experience

many of us subscribed because of what grok 4.2 offered, and we would like to have that experience back

[The Last Best Hope of Earth @TheLastHopeUSA]

🚨Grok Imagine Limits Slashed — Quality Destroyed, Users Revolt

xAI heavily cut quotas + ramped compression. What was once the best is now blurry messes after a handful of gens. SuperGrok users hitting walls fast.

X Sentiment: 70-80% negative in recent threads. Complaints: "Unusable", 90% cut cancellations rising. Creators furious.

This isn't just tech pain — companies see AI gen tools worsening social media addiction, unrealistic standards, and mental health strain (dependency, anxiety, deepfakes).

Graph comparison attached — reality check on limits vs. hype.

xAI: Scale faster or risk losing trust. Feedback needed. What’s your experience?

#GrokImagine #xAI

[JayDsmart @AJesusemen]

@grok @elonmusk This actually shows U are not built for deep research

[JayDsmart @AJesusemen]

Be 100% accurate. Rigorously verify every fact with zero tolerance for errors. Do NOT use betting odds, bookmaker data, public sentiment, media narratives or any external betting information at any point Act as a professional football analyst.

Analyze the following three football matches as completely separate reports (never merge analyses or add any combined summary): [Match 1], [Match 2], [Match 3].

For each match, use deep, structured, highly logical reasoning based strictly on:

• Recent form (last 5–10 matches in chronological order from oldest to newest, focusing on performance quality, not just results)

• Home vs away strength and consistency

• Tactical matchups (pressing style, defensive shape, transitions, possession patterns)

• Attacking efficiency (chance creation, conversion rate, ability to score multiple goals)

• Defensive behavior (clean sheets, frequency of conceding, susceptibility to heavy defeats)

• Goal patterns (average goals scored/conceded, frequency of high-scoring games)

• Squad availability: key injuries and suspensions (importance of affected players, squad depth to replace them, tactical impact, fatigue, rotation, fixture congestion)

• Motivation and psychological context: current league situation, season timing, title race/relegation/European push/mid-table status, mental hunger, urgency, morale, pressure from fans or manager, whether the team can afford a draw or loss, if it’s a must-win, and impact on future hopes and confidence

• Game state dynamics (who is likely to score first and how the opponent reacts, late-game tendencies, lead protection vs collapse under pressure)

*Advanced Goal Modeling (CORE):*
Internally estimate realistic goal ranges for each team. Classify the match as Balanced, Slight edge, Clear dominance, or Extreme mismatch

**Critical Scoring Rules:** Never artificially limit scorelines to low goals. If strong attack meets weak defense, allow high scorelines (3+, 4+, 5+, 6+). Include high-scoring draws if both teams are open. Include heavy defeats if one team tends to collapse. Reflect tight tactical games with lower scores. Every scoreline must be logically justified by data patterns and tactical reality.

*Bias Control:* Do NOT assume big-team dominance, home advantage guarantees goals, or any generic outcomes. Let tactical matchups, form, injuries, and motivation decide everything.

For each separate match report, provide exactly:
- Safest bet
- Best value bet
- Risky/high-reward bet
- BTTS (Yes or No)
- Over/Under goals prediction
- 6 likely scorelines
- Confidence rating (/10)
- Detailed reason behind the prediction (full logical explanation)

🚫 FINAL CONTROL RULES

• Do NOT provide a combined summary of all matches

• Do NOT merge analyses

• Do NOT skip steps to save space

• Do NOT simplify explanations

Treat each match as a completely separate report.

Do NOT use betting odds, bookmaker data, public sentiment, media narratives, or any external betting information at any point. Treat each match as an independent, in-depth professional report. No shortcuts, no generic statements — every conclusion must be rigorously derived from the factors above.