Tesla FSD (Supervised) has just officially been approved in Denmark!
This is the fourth European country to get FSD (Supervised) approved, and counting.
@nymbusjp yeah, a service center bay can serve as the workshop, no need to go all the way back to Austin. 100% with you that this means nothing until we see them gone.
@marcuslemonis Idk where all the 908 w north ave replies are coming from, not that location. As another commenter stated, it’s the old Office Depot just off the Ohio feeder ramp in River North - 352 W Grand Ave, Chicago, IL 60654
@WhatNarrative All valid points. Even less talked about is the premium required to give up control. Gonna have to be something paid for that as the institutions won’t be on board without it if I had to guess.
@nikitabier@blueskykites@Rainmaker1973@ViralRushX lol I love that all these accounts are ones I’ve blocked/muted long ago. glad something is finally being done to remove the incentive for these accounts!
@nikitabier@Shem_Infinite@itsrywal Didn’t even know this account existed., must have blocked/muted long ago because of this exact behavior. Wonder if Nawfal is getting similar treatment? Muted him recently for the same thing.
@butala_aryan Also caught it but not sure what to make of it. Could it be a further ramp of production, going into the fleet as you said or something else 🤷♂️. No idea but it did seem like an odd flub.
@CuriousPejjy@wholemars he’s proven time and time again to be a Elon kool-aid drinker. he makes claims that a merger “fixes” TSLA’s problems after for years being a perma-bull hollering TSLA to the moon. And he doesn’t really provide any evidence that SpaceX will “fix” it. Use some critical thinking
I believe it’s a split of a few different things, which are likely tied together to some degree:
1) Many of the larger accounts are likely in the higher echelons of net worth already
2) Many are already invested in SpaceX (see 1)
3) Investment horizons differ (see 1 & 2) - these investors are looking at the long term and don’t necessarily care what happens today, they are looking 5-10 years or more down the road.
And if they don’t already have investments in SpaceX, they may be all-in on TSLA and don’t want to liquidate to acquire a position at IPO. Some of them are undoubtedly just TSLA/Elon super fans that have no thought to question anything
@mikepat711 I’m no fan of Bradford either but you are absolutely right. Almost like the ones pointing the finger at him should look at the other three pointing back at themselves.
@trengilly1@JOBhakdi No they are not. 650 is the total count of vehicles ever observed to have been used in the fleet. The active fleet is much less than that. And the active, unsupervised fleet is around 40 vehicles. That is the number that truly matters.
No one is saying the value disappears, it’s all about what percentage of the conglomerate you get as a Tesla investor if a merger were to happen.
Today as a Tesla investor, you participate fully in the future value increase in Tesla due to Robotaxi. In the event of a merger, that value is shared with SpaceX shareholders if the value increase is not fully realized prior to the merger.
If SpaceX goes to 3T post-IPO and Tesla stays around 1.5T when the merger is announced, would you be happy with only realizing a 33% share in that future growth of the combined company? Or said a different way, that SpaceX investors, who have likely already seen a 10x plus gain in their investment then get to benefit in a 67% share of the future value increase of the combined company due to Robotaxi?
@FutureAZA@farzyness Wow, I had him muted so didn’t see this. Been saying if for a while now, everything coming from him has been an AI slop cash grab. Really surprised to see him so openly admit it. Unfollowed him ages ago, sad to see that others are falling for the nonsense.