ANCapital #BIP-110

◾️ Voluntaryist ANCAP
◾️ ₿itcoin (Class of 2010) #BIP110 (FGU)
◾️ Self defense & non-aggression
◾️ Just back on X for BIP-110, not for followers or fame

[ANCapital #BIP-110 @ANCapital_]

I'm just back on X for BIP-110.
https://t.co/VkP7vNbnqF

[ANCapital #BIP-110 @ANCapital_]

@proofofgolf @Puncher522 "It becomes a gatekeeper to what is “acceptable”."
Yeah, that's called a "protocol." which is what Bitcoin is.

[ANCapital #BIP-110 @ANCapital_]

@NathanpartPrice @Puncher522 You didn't get it, did you? Just think it through, you'll get it.

[ANCapital #BIP-110 @ANCapital_]

@BitsOfJT @Puncher522 BIP-110 doesn't tell anyone how to 'use their bitcoin'. That doesn't even make sense. If you're talking about using the bitcoin blockchain, then that's a different issue. Bitcoin is a protocol, it has rules. Those rules tell you how you can use the block chain, by definition

[ANCapital #BIP-110 @ANCapital_]

@BitsOfJT @Puncher522 This dude watched that whole video and didn't get it. Giving bitcoin NON-monetary uses, like NFTs, cloud storage, whatever., makes it LESS valuable, not more valuable. The best money is PURE MONEY, not money plus cloud storage. Money + NOTHING ELSE = the best money.

[Puncher75 - BIP-110 @Puncher522]

Jack gets it. BIP-110

[ANCapital #BIP-110 @ANCapital_]

@silentPredi @adam3us Nope, that comes straight from an email Satoshi wrote to devs in 2010 when I first mined BTC. The devs are NOT the consensus. The nodes make up most of the consensus. The devs are supposed to work with and listen to the node runners. Which they haven't been.

[ANCapital #BIP-110 @ANCapital_]

@0xaurSkyo @lifofifo The level of retardation such a statement requires.

[ANCapital #BIP-110 @ANCapital_]

@brickedbtw @lifofifo @mononautical imagine not knowing the definition of the word "arbitrary."

[ANCapital #BIP-110 @ANCapital_]

@bitcoinguideapp @Truthcoin He probably doesn't even know such a thing exists, and is only recently discovering how bitcoin actually works.

[ANCapital #BIP-110 @ANCapital_]

CORE and those against #BIP110 have no one to blame but themselves for silencing, censoring, ignoring, and disparaging those who oppose WIDENING the attack vectors on Bitcoin in recent years. Satoshi: "it's up to the developers AND the USERS [nodes] to agree on the path forward."

[ANCapital #BIP-110 @ANCapital_]

@MityaFy @sunnydecree @saifedean Like Satoshi said, bitcoin is still dependent on PEOPLE. "we can win a major battle in the arms race and gain a new territory of freedom for several years. But it is dependent on the people using it."

[ANCapital #BIP-110 @ANCapital_]

@sunnydecree I'm an OG, and I have to agree with your general sentiment. I straight-up don't give a fuck whether a btc is worth $1 or $1,000,000. Separating money & state, & as a result eventually ending the state all-together has always been why I love BTC. If BTC dies, there will be another

[ANCapital #BIP-110 @ANCapital_]

@dotkrueger @JennyBot88 @SimonDixonTwitt No it's not, actually. There's a big difference between loving the protocol & myopically worshipping BTC. The protocol can be copied, and improved upon. BTC is just it's current iteration. The question is do people care about freedom or wealth? BTC dying bc of myopic greed.

[ANCapital #BIP-110 @ANCapital_]

@saylor Sorry been here since 2010. One of the first to mine BTC in the world. And I don't care for your number-go-up, late-coiner, suitcoiner, narcissistic attitude. It's you who doesn't understand BTC and it's ethos. In fact, I don't think most bitcoiners these days really get it.

[ANCapital #BIP-110 @ANCapital_]

@BitcoonWorld @adam3us Spam doesn't & won't get priced out. It hasn't worked, & won't work. Spam has never been priced out of any protocol, ever. Besides, it's called a 'protocol' for a reason - it's a 'set of rules', i.e., a 'purity test'. Bitcoin is purely money not data storage. Don't like it, leave

[ANCapital #BIP-110 @ANCapital_]

@buymatador @adam3us In addition, Bitcoin's immutability has nothing to do with this issue. Immutability in Bitcoin simply refers to the fact that once transactions are made they are immutable - they can't be reversed, or erased.

[ANCapital #BIP-110 @ANCapital_]

@buymatador @adam3us "non-consensual" doesn't mean what you think it means. "Consent" is irrelevant in open source. No one is coercing (threatening physical violence) anyone to do anything. It's literally impossible to have non-consent, or coercion, in open source software.

[ANCapital #BIP-110 @ANCapital_]

@bramk @Maveth6 You just made a great case for BIP-110

[ANCapital #BIP-110 @ANCapital_]

@LukeDashjr @BigpictureBTC No one switched the narrative. Apparently you were listening, or were listening to people who didn’t know what they were talking about, or you’re lying.