On one hand you sold access to your dad while he was President of the United States, but on the other you didn’t shave for a few days, so it’s a toss-up
This makes me laugh.
“I smoked crack and slept with prostitutes at a cheap motel. I suffered no financial consequences and my dad pardoned me to get me out of legal trouble.
Do I look like I’m part of the elite oligarch class?”
Yes. That’s exactly what it looks like.
Great article by Paula Wright :
"Women like myself who point out the logical inconsistencies and totalitarian mission creep of feminism are labelled anti-feminist and anti-woman; as if “feminist” and “woman” were synonyms. They aren’t. Feminists are identified by their politics, not their sex or gender. They do not speak for women or the majority of egalitarians in society; they speak only for themselves. The dictionary definition of feminism is in serious need of a rewrite."
Obviously I don’t want to feel angry about the death of a boy as that would make me the tool of the far-right, so it would be helpful if the Government could tell me how I should feel. Annoyed? Irritated? Mildly anxious?
'If you want to be properly policed, you’ll have to start again and build a proper police force, like the one we used to have. Then we can sack all these useless paramilitary social workers. Yes, I am wholly serious.' https://t.co/lOIm77pXbJ via @DailyMail
If you watch the left's reaction to Charlie Pickering, you understand why totalitarianism thrives with them.
Even Charlie, a run of the mill leftist, is shackled to the wall because he dared to not too the line.
This is...obviously correct?
The elephant in the room with the "Why are women friends with (their) rapists?" conversation is that - speaking as a trained lawyer and former collegiate official - "my rapist" here basically NEVER means "forcible attacker of strangers or unwilling 1st dates."
The term is being used in the campus-feminist, behavior-X-is-over-the-legal-line-in-Utah sense to describe drunken lovers, badgering boyfriends, people who held your head too long at the end, etc. Cads.
In this context, "reclaiming my power" means "made HIM eat it the next time, backed up by the subtle threat of a charge." Women do not seem terrified by their ~consensual club-bathroom lovers because...they are not. Quite obviously, no XX humans are still buddies with ACTUAL knife-wielding sex criminals.
This is going to be one of those laws we'll look back on later and say "fuck that was a bad idea". Anyone who has ever done drugs in their life knows the correct amount of drugs to have in your system before driving is 0. This is what happens when fucking ANU nerd bureaucrats are let loose on policy making for real life. The reason why no one thought to make this law in the last two decades, is there were enough policy makers who had actual life experience, and had actually done drugs, to know it was a bad idea. Don't smoke a cone and drive, fucking ever. Don't do any drugs and ever operate any kind of heavy machinery, ever. The fact we are deviating from this CENTURY OLD standard suggests something deeply wrong with the people running our Governments.
@cmdibley@abcnews No, we think it’s hilarious how you will savage your own in a heartbeat if they dare hold even the slightest differing view to your leftist hive mind.
Cancel more lefties! We love it!
Calling J.K. Rowling "she that shall remain nameless" is very funny considering that the "he who must not be named" thing is clearly presented as a sign of fear and cowardice that the hero of the story rejects.
See, this is why I find Walsh impossible to dislike, despite his sledgehammer "theocratic fascist" views. Did any person have more success puncturing the thin absurd facade of the most insane cultural movement of our time? Did anybody do it better?
You’ll notice there is no look-back celebration or remembrance of this or virtually any of the other great moral victories from that era. It’s all been memory holed, a will-o'-the-wisp dimming out in the far distance.
It’s not surprising in the slightest. “You tax things you want less of”. The Government has been over taxing brewers for decades, and guess what happened - people drink less beer. So now there are less people making beer, more sales of imports, tighter margins for micro brewers. Higher incentives for black markets. Lower quality. Less tax for government. I don’t know how many more times this has to happen before they figure it out.