@pavyg@NickKyrgios He was transparent in facts he provided answer in less than 1 day to the authorities (it’s hard to understand for you but you are not the authority). He fired his team, he fought for his innocence but as you can understand WADA gave him the chance to close this case quicker
@NickKyrgios Man but, what’s your problem? I mean it’s incredibile how you cannot understand anything of official documents 🤣 can you at least read?
It’s something you learn at primary school
@piersmorgan Funny that a journalist isn’t able to read and understand simple and clear texts. WADA claimed there is not drug or doping case here. Come on man, start reading a little more
@tennisweeklypod What is a fair enough treatment for a player who did not cheat or doped (I’m not saying it, WADA is saying it). Just curious come one, if you tweet something, than explain it
@stanwawrinka Hey Stan, when you are not able anymore to read and understand a simple and clear text, maybe it’s time to retire or at least not to express any opinion. If you don’t understand, you don’t talk, it’s easy