I was illegally operated on by optometrist Johann Panthakey @ AccuVision on 28 December 2016. My records were signed by Dr Prashant Jindal, who I never met.
The determination is riddled with so many blatant lies that I felt physically 🤢 when I first skimmed through it.
Reading the Annexes I was shocked at the extent to which blame was unfairly piled on me in attempts to vindicate @PrashantJindall
To be discussed at a later date.
Recently published, @the_mpts 96 page determination in #PrashantJindal’s (rigged hearing), online for 12 months:
https://t.co/z1ykA2mHHm
There’s also a direct PDF link on this new informative website (that includes photos of the alleged criminals): https://t.co/rYGtzrsPO0
🧵
Since I’m supposedly no longer focus of these 3 days, interested to see what this is about & who Jindal appointed to replace Jo Sidhu, no longer a KC.
However, I won’t be surprised if application once again made for this to be heard in private session, once again approved by tribunal chair Debi Gould, and once again closed to the public, as on 24 June (details posted here 14 July).
Pls read screenshot carefully before my next post re Monday's scheduled hearing 👀
If unfamiliar w this bizarre story, background information via this link, incl alleged reason for postponement of Sept 2023 hearings: https://t.co/9J6MHAY7S8
#blindedonthehighstreet#stormsasha
Please support me, not least because my evidence is going to prove that @gmcuk and @the_mpts cannot be trusted!
https://t.co/9J6MHAYFHG
Things have to change, and for that we must replace the government on 4 July 👀
#blindedonthehighstreet#stormsasha@johnmcdonnellMP
If unfamiliar with the background to this post, please scroll back to 10 September (or beyond for full story - as much as I have so far disclosed that is, with more shockers yet to come 👀)
Following the inappropriate posts from Denis Fitton, husband of @the_mpts legal adviser Vaishali Fitton, the Executive Manager Gavin Brown’s response to Greg Brady’s partner Catherine Froud advised that an external legal firm had been instructed to investigate their complaint.
Seemingly not, and while we currently have no idea which legal firm was instructed, with the investigation expected to conclude this week, we should be provided with the outcome soon.
It will be interesting reading, and I live in hope that someone has done the right thing for a change, starting with an entirely independent and unbiased legal firm having been instructed, with no previous ties to either the @gmcuk or @the_mpts.
Meanwhile, given that (allegedly at his request) Dr @PrashantJindall’s three weeks FtP hearing on 25 September was postponed on 8 September, it’s surprising that four weeks later no dates have yet been proposed to relist it next year,
nor for the three days preliminary hearing, intended to include an unmerited application from @gmcuk to ban me from attending the substantive hearing even as a member of the public!