I don’t care what Bhansali created as a story.
But I don’t think that any of us have the right in 2026 to judge the choice of Jauhar in 14-15th century. The women had every right to save themselves from molestation, exploitation and sexual slavery. And if you think that they over reacted, you need to read more about what happened to Yazidi women in 21st century.. with the entire world watching. Or so many other conflict regions.. women and children were always at receiving end. Remember what happened to Bangladeshi women in 1971?
So don’t tell that their reaction 6-700 years ago was cowardice. It was a helpless no choice situation to somehow evade a life of misery. It must have taken huge amount of COURAGE to take that step and not the other way she is suggesting.
•Happiness index : Pakistan good India bad saar
•Hunger Index : Somalia good India bad saar
•Democracy Index : Sri Lanka Bangladesh good India bad saar
•Press freedom index : Afghanistan good India bad saar
👉🏻Look India’s GDP growth : 7.8% in Q1, strongest among major economies
Dimagi Naxals : No, We don’t believe this data. All these numbers are fake paper tiger paper number
Jauhar was and remains an act of utmost bravery in the face of unimaginable brutality.
Swara is using a false equivalence of rape to compare a medieval barbarity and atrocity.
Showing stunning ignorance she says that she is arguing that why shall a pregnant women commit jauhar just to protect her foetus.
What a wilful intellectual blindness.
शरीर पर चर्बी का जमना तो फिर भी ठीक है लेकिन दिमाग में जम जाना खतरनाक होता है...
हिंदू महिलाओं ने जौहर जैसी परंपरा अपनाई थी, ताकि आक्रमणकारियों द्वारा उन्हें बंदी बनाकर दास या यौन शोषण का शिकार न बनाया जा सके।
उनके लिए यह सम्मान और अपनी इच्छा से जीवन का बलिदान देने का निर्णय था।
उनके जीवन और मृत्यु के उस निर्णय को आज की दृष्टि से अपमानित करना इतिहास और उनके साहस, दोनों का अनादर है।
Dumbduck moron Swara Begum.
The Devis who committed Jauhar were NOT r*** survivors. They embraced the sacrificial fire BEFORE they could be violated to ensure that their bodies and souls were never molested in the first place. So they were not survivors - they were VICTORS. They did not commit s**cide but self-preservation of their own dignity and spirit.
They could have chosen any other way to end their lives. Why do you think they chose the horrifyingly, painful path of burning their living bodies to ashes??
It's because it is a documented fact that the invading Islamic hordes did not spare children, elderly and even *dead bodies* from their savage lust. So these Devis ensured that even their dead body did not end up becoming a victim of such barbaric evil.
Do you know what kind of fate awaited those who became the living victims of those invading beasts?
Imagine being subjected to the savagery of gang-r*** by hundreds of violent murderous beasts who were high on opium and possessed by bloodlust. Victim's bodies were literally ripped apart, then brutally slashed by weapons and left to a horrifying, tortured end, writhing in the painful agony of injuries and internal bleeding.
Those who were unlucky enough to survive the assaults were forced to become sex slaves and subjected to horrors worse than death in a slow painful existence. Any sane woman with a shred of dignity or self-integrity would exercise her agency and do anything to prevent such a fate.
Now imagine allowing your infant child or any of your children to be subjected to such horror?? No woman who calls herself mother would ever let her child be subjected to such a terrifying destiny
You have neither the brains, nor the heart or the soul to understand even an iota of what these brave Hindu Rajput women's self-sacrifice meant.
Stick to your vibrator and Halala. Yahi hai teri auqaat.
Swara Bhasker on Jauhar: "If I was a rape survivor, what is this film telling me? I would feel like a coward that I didn't kill myself to save my honor... Are we saying rape is the end of a woman's life?"
Swara Bhasker on Jauhar: "If I was a rape survivor, what is this film telling me? I would feel like a coward that I didn't kill myself to save my honor... Are we saying rape is the end of a woman's life?"
Rajveer Sir with a befitting response 🔥
"Jauhar was a refusal to bow before invaders and a defence of self-respect. History’s courage and sacrifice cannot be judged through the lens of convenience."
BIG NEWS 🚨 Rajveer Sir replies to Swara Bhaskar for comments on Jauhar 😳
SWARA : "If I were a rape survivor, what is this film telling me? I would feel like a coward for not harming myself to save my honour"
RAJVEER SIR : "Jauhar was a refusal to bow before invaders and a defence of self-respect. History’s courage and sacrifice cannot be judged through the lens of convenience."
Someone tell this Buffalo that Hindu ladies used to commit Johar to escape getting trafficked as sex slaves to middle eastern nations by Islamic invaders.
It was their life and their choice to die dignified.
Judging Jauhar through a cushioned, 21st-century ideological lens is historical illiteracy wrapped in cheap academic posturing.
If Jauhar were just an invention of Hindu patriarchy or misogyny, where was it during the centuries of internal battles between Hindu kings? It didn't exist, because they fought with a certain honor that included not targeting non-combatants, including women, in any way. Jauhar emerged exclusively as a response to medieval Islamic invasions, where war wasn't just about territory, but systemic mass rape, forced conversion, and selling women off like livestock in foreign slave markets.
Feminists like Swara Bhasker preach about autonomy and choice, completely ignoring the reality of the situation. When foreign armies breached the fort, women didn't have a choice between death and living. Their only two options were a quick, self-inflicted death, or death after years of violent sexual abuse, physical torture, and horrific enslavement until their bodies gave out.
Condemning those women for burning themselves while ignoring the barbarians who drove them into the fire is pathetic victim-blaming. Jauhar was a tragedy, but the absolute onus belongs entirely on the invaders who forced that reality upon them.
स्वरा भास्कर का कहना सही है की वो मरने से बेहतर लड़ना पसंद करतीं , “she is more than her vagina ” क्योंकि आज देश में स्त्रियों को समान अधिकार प्राप्त हैं । आज कोई मुग़ल आक्रांताओं का शासन थोड़े ना है, जहाँ हिंदू राजाओं/सभासदों की स्त्रियों को ‘ सेक्स स्लेव ’ बनाकर रखा जाता था । 21 वी शताब्दी में बैठी हुई स्त्री मध्यकालीन स्त्रीयों को पढ़ें बिना, देश-काल-परिस्थिति देखे बिना कुछ भी कहने और लिखने बोलने के लिए स्वतंत्र हैं ।
What I understand from this image
In India, anyone regardless of their caste, creed, race, religion, sex or family can sit on the highest position of power.
While in Pakistan you need to be a fair skinned Sunni Muslim either from the Bhutto or Shariff family to lead the nation.
Swara Bhasker:
A rape survivor choosing life is brave
so were Chittor’s Rajput women who refused capture and enslavement by an Islamist sex maniac and invader.
But by drawing a false equivalence between the two- Swara , with a sinister motive, clean chits & erases Allauddin Khilji from the equation deliberately and puts his Hindu victims on trial.
It is much like the play book 📕 Raul Gandhi uses. Abuse Hindus & Spare the Islamists
Whether Swara did it political reasons or personal.. will decode it tonight 11pm
Here : Instagram: https://t.co/lipIsGXJFT
YouTube: https://t.co/aZiKBajBbD
At a CPI rally, Amarjeet Kaur (National Secretary of CPI) is heard saying they will "finish off" Narendra Modi.
This is not criticism, this is an open threat to the Prime Minister.
These are the same people who have a long record of sympathy for violent extremist politics.
Freedom of speech does not mean threatening the country’s elected Prime Minister.