Ofc, everything we do is the perfect balance.
Anything less accessible is an impenetrable, jargon-filled status game.
Anything more accessible is un-rigorous pop-science nonsense.
Academics write for each other, not for people.
Steven Pinker has spent over four decades doing the opposite, and thinks current academic writing is "enormous wasted effort."
"There's an awful lot of brilliant work, really smart people in academia. Why are they doing it? Just to entertain each other? Taxpayers pay for it. It should be accessible. Why should I have to read a paragraph five or six times?
It gets under my skin when academics devote so much brainpower into the scholarship and then just blow off the essential task of letting the world know what you've done."
Consciousness is a fundamentally moral judgment. The default purely logical inference from any individual's observed behavior is: "I am conscious, no one else in the world is". But the society that results from solipsism is, of course, horrific for all participants
@Nerland87@ryancbriggs I think people have many goals, but an important one is often income.
If universities’ main goal becomes producing well rounded citizens but the dollar RoI is ~0, I think there’ll be low takeup.
@ryancbriggs I think if we get real abundance from AI, people will study for its own sake.
BUT until then, I think people are pretty interested in the economic returns, I’m guessing this won’t be reassuring to them.
I think people lifting weights mostly also have an instrumental goal tbh
@TomMillerUK Is that because you think that no amount of market-rate housing would sufficiently alleviate pressure on the social housing stock, or because you think that commercial incentives aren't sufficient to build enough even if we removed restrictions on supply?
JUST IN: Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark reportedly warned new recruits to “get hobbies that aren’t computers,” saying the company is building a “superhuman coder with nation-state hacking capabilities.”
It's crazy how zombie facts proliferate.
There's a factoid that Mississippi has higher per capita income than the UK. Depends on measure and time.
@ianbremmer says on @ezraklein show that it was higher than *every* European country. That's false on any metric!
@atrembath Like, this is a real live issue right now. Voters' revealed preference is that they're willing to pay a bit more to avoid a cruel practice. These will happen one at a time, but I suspect that more would follow.
https://t.co/umgFF5DvXJ
@atrembath Fair, maybe "factory farm" is an imprecise term, so let's scrap that.
But I do think that through a lot of low-cost incremental regulations you can have a big change, avoiding much of the suffering of current animal ag.
@atrembath And it goes both ways, speed & direction of tech depends on policy. We should invest in new tech, and use regulation to encourage R&D.
Like, would you have opposed European bans on shredding chicks, and insisted we wait until in-ovo sexing was cost competitve?
@atrembath I think this is a false dichotomy, same as in climate. Technology and regulation are complements. E.g. in-ovo sexing technology makes it cheap to avoid throwing chicks in shredder, enabling regulation.
Regs still needed though, what's the tech-only solution to gestation crates?