@6LackPantha@tweet_kune_do@SportsRadioWIP Lol. They had that luxury because they already had a WR1 on their roster. AJ was expendable. There are no good, cheap win now QB1s and his dead money makes it prohibitive to bring in a proven QB1 before 2028. Now that we’ve settled that… who are you replacing Jalen with anyway?
@6LackPantha@tweet_kune_do@SportsRadioWIP Yes, it’s spread across the 3 years listed in the image below. The Eagles replaced AJ with Wicks and Lemon who have little to no cap impact. Replacing a QB is significantly different. So you’re either replacing him with an unproven rookie or at the numbers in the Baker scenario
@6LackPantha@tweet_kune_do@SportsRadioWIP Maybe. Depends on his play but he’s proven you can win the division, conference and SB with him at QB. He’s a significantly better option than whatever else is out there at the numbers above
@6LackPantha@tweet_kune_do@SportsRadioWIP You’re using an ai source lol. OTC splits the charge. It’s 20M in 27. 16M in 28 and 8M in 29. The 42M gets spread across those years. It’s still accumulative. So, if you signed Baker at 35M for 3 years, you’d really be allocating 52M, 48M, 42M to the position.
@6LackPantha@tweet_kune_do@SportsRadioWIP Again, you’re not accumulating your numbers. Say they signed Baker at 35M in March 27. They’d have him and JH on the roster for 77M in 27. Then post 6/1 they’d trade JH and get that number to 52M. That’s an absurd number for Baker. Hurts would be cheaper for the same production
@6LackPantha@tweet_kune_do@SportsRadioWIP Your numbers are wrong. Also AJ has a dead cap of 21M this year and 27M next. It works because they have a proven replacement in Smitty. They didn’t have to add a 40M free agent to replace his production. They would with Jalen on top of his dead cap. https://t.co/YcS9hQ4AhP
@6LackPantha@tweet_kune_do@SportsRadioWIP If they’re drafting a QB then they’re rebuilding and you don’t do that with this defense. It’s too financially irresponsible/ risky to move on before 28 league year
@6LackPantha@tweet_kune_do@SportsRadioWIP The Eagles aren’t dumb enough to do that. Second, draft a rookie starter to a roster that’s in win now mode. Fun fact, Hurts is the most recent drafted QB to make a SB. Again, the Eagles aren’t that stupid.
@6LackPantha@tweet_kune_do@SportsRadioWIP You clearly don’t understand the cap. Post June 1st cut doesn’t mean you can build a roster over the cap pre June 1st. Free agency, draft, your roster is all built pre 6/1 for 2027. You’d carry the new QBs cap and Jalen’s current cap (45M) until 6/1 of 2027
@6LackPantha@tweet_kune_do@SportsRadioWIP Trading him post 6/1 still prevents you from adding a proven player pre 6/1 and fill your roster. Any proven QB is getting 40M a year and the Eagles aren’t allocating 60M+ (40 to new QB and 20 in dead cap) when they can just keep Hurts for 40M. He’s here till 28 on this deal
@6LackPantha@tweet_kune_do@SportsRadioWIP None of that answers how they would create the space pre 6/1 to pay a different QB, plus JC, Q and any other roster additions. In your scenario, they’re cutting a SB MVP at 28 and finding a QB post 6/1 that’s going to be better than him… okay.
@6LackPantha@tweet_kune_do@SportsRadioWIP In what world is a serious NFL franchise moving off their starting QB post June 1st with a win now roster and how are you creating the cap to get a starter before 6/1 in that scenario?
@6LackPantha@tweet_kune_do@SportsRadioWIP It would cost the eagles $107M in dead cap to move off Hurts before the end of 2027. He’s “guaranteed” this year and next for that reason.
@charlieo_conn@orangestreak@PHLY_Flyers Konecny played 18 PP minutes and had 0 PP points. Forester played 13 PP minutes and had 0 PP points. Did they earn that with their play? Michkov has the 2nd most PP points on the team over the past two seasons. It’s okay to question that deployment lol
@orangestreak@PHLY_Flyers@charlieo_conn@charlieo_conn won’t acknowledge that. His deployment correlated to his play and actively worked against his strengths. Of course he was bad lol. Good coaching puts players in positions to succeed, not the opposite. Well run orgs don’t have these issues. 51 years of the flyer way