GUPTA_A

[GUPTA_A @A_GUPTA_]

I never expected people have actually signed up for the application I built already. https://t.co/Fxcj8KBzpO Thank you for the support. I will release it soon enough. For sometime it will be a closed beta. #AI #UnrealEngine

[GUPTA_A @A_GUPTA_]

https://t.co/OTYoDKI6yB currently working on this in parallel. #github #infosec #repo #WIP

[GUPTA_A @A_GUPTA_]

I've been building EmbeddedMQ.

Think SQLite, but for message queues—embed it directly into your application instead of running a separate broker.

Looking for honest feedback from systems engineers.

GitHub: https://t.co/biOm233JYU #opensource #embedded #C

[GUPTA_A @A_GUPTA_]

I never knew when I built this mcp server I will have stars as well as forks. Unexpected and thankful. Someone also even reported an issue:

https://t.co/tV8pgFFvOy

[GUPTA_A @A_GUPTA_]

@cursor_ai composer 2.5 is really good to use to be honest. I am eagerly waiting for its next iteration.

[GUPTA_A @A_GUPTA_]

@Lordsaucyy I will keep that in mind. I am currently not in a position to hire though :(

[GUPTA_A @A_GUPTA_]

I am trying to build an AI agent that understands a unreal engine 5 project its assets and functionality and provide a solution using #AI something similar to #Cursor. A coding assistant for unreal engine 5. I used agno for setting things up fast. This is what I achived till now:

[GUPTA_A @A_GUPTA_]

@pritisinghhhh Thank you

[GUPTA_A @A_GUPTA_]

@theanuragdev Thank you

[GUPTA_A @A_GUPTA_]

@aravind @total_woke_ Wtf

[GUPTA_A @A_GUPTA_]

@vaaselene I am working on a coding assistant that helps build games in Unreal engine.

[GUPTA_A @A_GUPTA_]

@DanielSmidstrup Does steam qualify ?

[GUPTA_A @A_GUPTA_]

@Tushar_Jsx Complexity is the uasset files and making it understandable for a LLM to parse and understand. What i achieved till now is its able to generate blueprints some are correct some incorrect.

[GUPTA_A @A_GUPTA_]

@Tushar_Jsx I like working on unreal engine 5 this is a plugin i built that extends the unreal engine functionality.

https://t.co/cnpeiSK0dI

Currently working on another plugin that will allow users to build games or functions using AI similar to cursor.

[GUPTA_A @A_GUPTA_]

Awful after sale service. How are your sales system working ? Or for the last 4 months you ppl stoped selling because of your system update?

[GUPTA_A @A_GUPTA_]

@CaratLane is a scam company. Purchased a ring from them . The size was small. Went to multiple outlets for a size fix which they denied coz their so called system and told us to come back after Feb. When I went to get it fixed they are now charging for a size fix which was free

[Pratyush Kumar @pratykumar]

Drop 12/14: Models, products, impact - today something different, very different. Launching Sarvam Kaze, our foray into getting our models into the your hands with our devices - designed and built here in India!

[Deepinder Goyal @deepigoyal]

Facts below (1/5):

In 2025, average earnings per hour (EPH), excluding tips, for a delivery partner on Zomato were ₹102.
In 2024, this number was ₹92. That’s a ~10.9% year-on-year increase. Over a longer horizon also, EPH has shown steady growth.

Most delivery partners work for a few hours and only a few days in a month. But if someone were to work for 10 hours/day, 26 days/month, this translates to ~₹26,500/month in gross earnings. After accounting for fuel and maintenance (~20%), the net earnings for the partner are ~₹21,000/month.

Note: Earnings per hour are calculated on total hours logged in, including the time when the partner might be waiting to receive an order. Earnings per “busy hour” will be higher but that’s not the right metric to look at.

On top of this - delivery partners earn 100% of tips given by customers. The average tip per hour in 2025 on Zomato was INR 2.6 and in 2024 was INR 2.4 per hour. Tips are transferred instantly, with zero deductions. We absorb the payment gateway processing cost ourselves. About 5% of the orders get tipped on Zomato; 2.5% on Blinkit.

[Deepinder Goyal @deepigoyal]

Zomato and Blinkit delivered at a record pace yesterday, unaffected by calls for strikes that many of us heard over the past few days.

Support from local law enforcement helped keep the small number of miscreants in check, enabling 4.5 lakh+ delivery partners across both platforms to deliver more than 75 lakh orders (all-time high) to over 63 lakh customers during the day. This happened without any additional incentives for delivery partners - NYE does see higher incentives than usual days and yesterday was no different than the past NYE days.

I am grateful to local authorities across the country and to our teams on the ground for clear enforcement and swift coordination.

Most importantly, thank you to our delivery partners who showed up despite intimidation, stood their ground, and chose honest work and progress.

One thought for everyone: if a system were fundamentally unfair, it would not consistently attract and retain so many people who choose to work within it. Please don’t get swept up by narratives pushed by vested interests.

The gig economy is one of India’s largest organised job creation engines, and its real impact will compound over time, when delivery partners’ children, supported by stable incomes and education, enter the workforce and help transform our country at scale.

[Deepinder Goyal @deepigoyal]

Last one on this topic, and I have been holding this in myself for a while.

For centuries, class divides kept the labor of the poor invisible to the rich. Factory workers toiled behind walls, farmers in distant fields, domestic help in backrooms. The wealthy consumed the fruits of that labor without ever seeing the faces or the fatigue behind it. No direct encounter, no personal guilt.

The gig economy shattered that invisibility, at unprecedented scale.

Suddenly, the poor aren't hidden away. They're at your doorstep: the delivery partner handing over your ₹1000+ biryani, late-night groceries, or quick-commerce essentials. You see them in the rain, heat, traffic, often on borrowed bikes, working 8–10 hours for earnings that give them sustenance. You see their exhaustion, their polite smile masking frustration with life in general.

This is the first time in history at this scale that the working class and consuming class interact face-to-face, transaction after transaction. And that discomfort with our own selves is why we are uncomfortable about the gig economy. We want these people to look our part, so that the guilt we feel while taking orders from them feels less.

We aren't just debating economics. We are confronting guilt. That ₹800 order might equal their entire day's earnings after fuel, bike rent, and app cuts. We tip awkwardly, or avoid eye contact, because the inequality is no longer abstract. It's personal.

Pre-gig era, the rich could enjoy luxury without moral discomfort. Labor was out of sight. Now, every doorbell ring is a reminder of systemic inequality. That's why debates explode. It's not just policy. It's emotional reckoning. Some defend the system (“they choose it”), others demand change (“this isn't progress, its exploitation”).

And here’s the uncomfortable twist: the unsaid ask of clumsy ‘solutions’ isn’t dignity. It is about returning to invisibility.

Ban gig work and you don’t solve inequality. You remove livelihoods. These jobs don’t magically reappear as formal, protected employment the next day. They disappear, or they get pushed back into the informal economy where there are even fewer protections and even less accountability. Over-regulate it until the model breaks, and you achieve the same outcome through paperwork instead of slogans: the work evaporates, prices rise, demand collapses, and the people we claim to protect are the first to lose income.

And then what happens?

The rich get their old comfort back. Convenience returns without faces. Guilt dissolves. We go back to clean abstractions and moral posturing from a distance. The poor don’t become safer, they become invisible again: back in cash economies, back in backrooms, back in shadows where regulation rarely reaches and dignity isn’t even debated.

The gig economy just exposed the reality of inequality to the people who previously had the luxury of not seeing it. The doorbell is not the problem. The question is what we do after opening the door.

Visibility is the price of progress. We can either use this discomfort to build something better (which we keep doing continuously as delivery partners are our backbone), or we can ban and over-regulate our way back into ignorance. One of those choices improves lives. The other simply helps the consuming class feel virtuous in the dark.