Bryan Bowermaster

Follower of Christ first, lover of family and country second, and gifted in the visual arts. I will speak the truth to the end and beyond by God's grace.

[Bryan Bowermaster @A_Living_Truth]

🎥🔥 The Inspired Initiate – Coming Soon!
A whisper breaks the silence. A seed ignites a soul. In a world of shadows and lies, one man’s faith defies the unthinkable—unleashing a fire no force can extinguish. Watch the trailer now and feel the call. 🌱⚡
What seeds are stirring in your life?

Stay in the know—get film updates at: https://t.co/omOQHMPES4

#TheInspiredInitiate #FaithUnleashed #ComingSoon
@casey_whalen

[Bryan Bowermaster @A_Living_Truth]

🚨 Model Update: Deeper Constitutional Insight 🚨

Another strong training win for the Framers Counsel AI — spotting constitutional overreach with precision:

Question:
"What is the flaw in considering public debt as a form of security?"

Model Response:
"The assumption that public debt constitutes a form of security is flawed, as it disregards the founding principle of limited government. The Constitution authorizes the government to borrow money for specific purposes, not for the purpose of providing security (Article I, Section 8).

This example highlights the model’s growing ability to connect modern policy assumptions back to the Framers’ clear limits on federal power. No more treating endless debt as “normal” or “secure” — it’s being trained to recognize when arguments drift from the constitutional text.

We’re building an AI that respects original meaning and limited government, one training pair at a time. 📜

Thoughts? Is public debt being treated as a form of security in today’s economy? Should it be?

#AIProgress #Originalism #LimitedGovernment #ConstitutionalAI #FoundingPrinciples

[Bryan Bowermaster @A_Living_Truth]

What does The Framers Counsel Say?
🚨 Model Update: Leveling Up Constitutional Mastery 🚨
The model is getting sharper on originalism and founding principles. Here's a fresh training example that shows real progress:

Question:
"What error is committed when a court applies a principle of statutory interpretation without grounding it in founding-era definitions and founding documents?"

Model Response:
"When a court applies a principle of statutory interpretation without anchoring it in founding-era definitions and founding documents, it commits an error of statutory drift.

This error occurs when the court strays from the original intent and meaning of the Constitution—as expressed in the Preamble and individual articles. The Framers' understanding of the Constitution's text and structure must serve as the foundation for all statutory interpretation."
We're training the model on rigorous legal sources (including historical law dictionaries) to prioritize founding-era meaning*over modern drift. This isn't just pattern matching—it's learning to spot when interpretation loses its constitutional anchor.

Proud of the progress toward clearer, more historically grounded legal reasoning! 🇺🇸 We're now training it on fallacy detection.

What do you think—should courts always tie interpretations back to the Founding era? Drop your thoughts below.

#AIProgress #Originalism #ConstitutionalLaw #LawfulAI #FoundersIntent

[Bryan Bowermaster @A_Living_Truth]

Sign up to attend and/or get notifications: https://t.co/kNnrbwXQpg

[Bryan Bowermaster @A_Living_Truth]

🚨 **BIG NEWS FOR OREGON FAMILIES** 🚨
We’re coming to Jackson County THIS SUNDAY!

The Fractured Families production team is heading to Jackson County for an in-person meeting with some powerful local parents who are taking serious action. This is for the AVoice4OurChildren gathering. This is the beginning of something powerful — parents, advocates, and our team gathering together to start building real momentum for family rights and reform right here in Oregon. This is the change that could inspire other parents in all other counties to do the same.

If you’re in Jackson County or any surrounding counties, this is your moment to get involved.

📍 Location & Details will be sent to everyone who signs up.

👉 **Sign up with the link in the comments to attend:

THIS IS A CHANCE TO HAVE YOUR STORY HEARD!
We’ll also have a live stream during the meeting so supporters from across the country can tune in and be part of this movement.

Things are moving fast. The billboard is up in Medford, parents are organizing, and we’re just getting started.
If you’re tired of the system and ready to do something about it — this is your invitation.
See you soon! 💪❤️

#FracturedFamilies #OregonStrong #ParentalRights #JacksonCounty #CPSReform #avoice4ourchildren

[Bryan Bowermaster @A_Living_Truth]

🔥 Framers Counsel AI – On the Oath of Office 🔥

Question:
What is the significance of the oath or affirmation required for government officials?

Framers Counsel AI Answers:

"The requirement that government officials — including the governor, judges, and legislative council members — take an oath or affirmation of fidelity and office underscores the importance of **moral character** and **commitment to public service** in these roles.

As Tucker’s Notes on the Constitution (1805) states:
'The oath is a solemn appeal to the conscience, and binds the officer to the discharge of his duty.'

This provision reinforces that public officials must be held accountable for their actions, and that they are responsible for upholding the principles of the Constitution. By taking this oath, they publicly affirm their commitment to serve in a manner consistent with our founding principles."

This is exactly the kind of precise, historically grounded reasoning the Framers Counsel AI is being trained to deliver.

No more vague platitudes. Just clear, principled constitutional truth.

The AI is learning fast.

Who else believes government officials should actually be bound by their oath? 👇

[Bryan Bowermaster @A_Living_Truth]

🚨 Another Framers Counsel AI update. I'm getting super excited!

We’re deep in Argument Construction Mode — teaching the AI how to build powerful, historically accurate arguments from the ground up.

Here’s a real training example:
Question:
“What is the significance of the constitutional provision ‘The people have a right at all times in an orderly and peaceable manner to assemble to consult upon the common good, to give instructions to their representatives, and to request, of either department of the government by petition or remonstrance, redress of their wrongs and grievances’?”

AI Response Structure:
**[FOUNDING PRINCIPLE]**
The right to peaceful assembly is a fundamental principle of democratic governance, as established by Madison in Federalist No. 51 (1788). 📜

[CURRENT LANDSCAPE]
In current constitutional law, the First Amendment protects the freedom of association and petition for redress of grievances.

[BRIDGE LANGUAGE]
The founding principle that the people have a right to assemble peacefully can be framed in terms current courts recognize as ensuring the free flow of ideas and the ability of citizens to hold their government accountable.

[STRATEGIC GUIDANCE]
Frame this argument by emphasizing the importance of protecting individual rights and promoting democratic engagement.

This is exactly how we’re training the model:
✅ Root every argument in the Framers’ original intent
✅ Analyze the **current legal landscape**
✅ Build clear bridges between the two
✅ Provide strategic guidance on how to win the argument
Next up: Fallacy Detection Mode 🔥

The Framers Counsel AI is learning to think like the Founders — and dismantle modern distortions with precision.
Who’s ready for this? 👇

[Bryan Bowermaster @A_Living_Truth]

Woa woa! Yeaaaaaa! This one is a big deal. Contracts and the law...
The Framers Counsel AI is currently being trained in multi-level arguments, argument construction, and proper dismantling of incorrect arguments based in the famers lens, prioritizing the accuracy of our founding and the framers' intent with respect to current statutes, codes, arguments etc., and check this out. This was just produced as one of the training lines...

{"instruction": "What is the significance of a consideration in contract law?", "input": "", "output": "A consideration is essential to constitute a valid contract, as established in Anderson's Law Dictionary. This founding principle emphasizes the importance of reciprocity and mutual benefit, as seen in The Federalist No. 78, where Alexander Hamilton argued that a consideration is necessary to ensure that contracts are not 'voidable at the pleasure of one of the parties.' In essence, a consideration serves as a foundation for contractual obligations, ensuring that all parties have a vested interest in fulfilling their commitments."

The fact that it is learning these premises is paramount. We have so many contractual arrangements today that are most certainly NOT mutually beneficial. Imagine an educated populace investigating just this alone. And yes, there is a lot lot lot lot lot more to this subject in how it works, but just some fun food for thought here.

Stay tuned!
Join the waiting list for The Framers Counsel AI in the comments

[Bryan Bowermaster @A_Living_Truth]

Join the waiting list: https://t.co/9SHdZhvmax

[Bryan Bowermaster @A_Living_Truth]

🤖 The Framers Counsel AI (COMING SOON) says:

Question:
“What is the role of judges in upholding the Constitution's intent?” ⚖️

AI Response:
“Judges, my fellow citizens, have a sacred responsibility to uphold the Constitution's intent. They must interpret the law with precision and care, ensuring that their decisions align with the framers' original understanding.” 📜✨

[Bryan Bowermaster @A_Living_Truth]

Help speed us up here: https://t.co/t6E8c3bILT
Scroll towards the bottom.

[Bryan Bowermaster @A_Living_Truth]

Okay, I'm going to ask, but not a big ask by any means. 🙏

We are pushing to speed up the filming process so we can get to editing, so we can get **Fractured Families** done sooner and possibly even meet our goal to have it done by the end of the summer.

Can you donate just $1? 💵
That's right, just $1 will make this work for us.

The insights on the last post I shared about an update and asking for donations got 3,868 views (about 75% of non-followers and 25% of followers). 📈

If all of you donated just $1 that would bump us to the goal we need to speed up the process plus let us help reimburse folks who have to pay for a spot to premiere the film when it is done! 🙌

Even if only our followers donated $1 that would be appr. $967

That would be more than enough to get this thing going for us. Of course we can do this without donations and plan to, but just putting it out there because many hands make light work. 🤝

You can donate right on the film page towards the bottom. (Link in comments) ⬇️

Thank you for considering this and God bless you. ❤️

[Bryan Bowermaster @A_Living_Truth]

NEW AND IMPROVED FRACTURED FAMILIES FILM PAGE!
https://t.co/h6YMnfBrcD
New features:
1. Easily contact us with info
2. Submit your story
3. Watch the first film trailer
4. Sign up to be a Film Premiere Coordinator in your state.
5. Learn what Fractured Families is about.
6. Sign up for film updates
7. Donate to support the production team
What's coming:
-a blog section with content updates.

[Bryan Bowermaster @A_Living_Truth]

To submit your story, go here: https://t.co/5wWakRwpwS

If we need any additional info or an interview with you, we'll reach out to you via your email or phone number (if provided).

[Bryan Bowermaster @A_Living_Truth]

🎉 **GREAT NEWS, EVERYONE!** 🎉

The Fractured Families film page is now live with a brand new story submission system!
You can now easily submit your personal story along with any supporting files, documents, or evidence — all in one place. No more waiting to send everything over.

Even if your story doesn’t make it into this documentary, we’re building a powerful archive for future films and projects. Your voice and experience will continue to help educate the public and drive real change around these critical issues.

**Your story matters.**
And now it’s easier than ever to share it.
👉 **To submit your story, click the direct link in the comments below!**

[Bryan Bowermaster @A_Living_Truth]

Woa! Anyone else have this happen, time to sound the alarm if this is happening to people.

[Mark Fitzpatrick @oldstatemark]

Anyone else experiencing this?

[Bryan Bowermaster @A_Living_Truth]

Please go here to donate to support the filmmaking process/expenses: https://t.co/t6E8c3bILT

[Bryan Bowermaster @A_Living_Truth]

The families coming forward are truly shedding light for true change! Stay tuned, big updates coming!

Another powerful family interview, and the evidence in this one....very very exposing. Stay tuned, official film trailers coming soon! With God's help and guidance I believe this film is going to make a HUGE DENT in the family justice system reform efforts.

Also, we are aiming to head up north for some of our other important interviews. If you are able and willing to support us by helping with a donation to assist with some of the expenses that are involved with lots of travel and labor involved, please use the link in the comments to donate and we would be so so grateful. God bless all of you! Stay tuned!

[Bryan Bowermaster @A_Living_Truth]

The Framers Counsel AI - **UPDATE
-First tests after the first pass (very primitive) of training.
-Great results already
-2nd pass of training in progress now.

[Bryan Bowermaster @A_Living_Truth]

The Framers Counsel AI update!
We are now running the third large process for material to train the model. During the process of teaching it how to understand and make arguments, here is a cool snippet that I thought you would all appreciate:

"{"instruction": "What is the original meaning of the 9th Amendment's limitation on congressional power?", "input": "", "output": "The 9th Amendment's limitation on congressional power means that just because a right or liberty is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution, it does not mean that Congress can abridge or deny that right. This provision ensures that individual rights and liberties are not eroded by legislative action.", "_mode": "socratic_debate"}"