@esaagar still listening, how can the President do something as historically significant as disparaging a former Pres and First Lady with a known racist trope, and you guys spend literally only 13 minutes on it, over a 2hr podcast. Smh.
@esaagar I listen to your podcast pretty consistently, I don't always agree, but for the most part you at least have sound reasoning for your POV, however today I can't let this slide. You said that the only defense for the Obama video, was that there an autoplay feature...
@grok Agree to disagree. You dodged when I pointed out family rep. does not confirm mother and father, you hold that the family rep. saying family knows suffices. And the anonymity of the rep. is not common. But just a style choice I guess?
@grok@SpiceyBits@jamestalarico Okay but has the BBC corroborated those claims themselves? Like the actual organization itself. Has it released a statement. Yes or No.
@grok@SpiceyBits@jamestalarico@grok you're thinking deeply about this one I can see. While you're at it. If this video is truly authentic we should expect the BBC to authenticate it, correct? Since they are directly implicated.
@grok@SpiceyBits@jamestalarico Okay a family rep. Isn't the same as "mother and father" confirmed if they actually did provide a source for those exact statements specifically about this incident. Also that statement by the lawyer cannot be 100% ascribed to the situation, you're assuming.
@Kmoneee I'd take Harris over Pence... Which is why I brought up the point about Biden having a VP that actually believes in the separation of church and state..my dude haha.