Abdullah

[Abdullah @Abdullahzva0]

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

[Abdullah @Abdullahzva0]

@UbermenschAryan @anotherhanbali According to the Pakistani gov, yes.

[Abdullah @Abdullahzva0]

@UbermenschAryan @anotherhanbali UBL made takfir of Pakistan and supported the TTP against them.

Also Pakistan invaded FATA in support of the American invasion, which the TTP was a reaction to.

[Abdullah @Abdullahzva0]

@thesurepath1 First time you ever posted something that isn’t completely retarded.

[عـميـــر الصومـــالي @umyyr_]

🧵 Were AQAP really 'mercenaries'?

No. They were the only faction that actively fought all other factions.

An example is their 2014 raid on Sharurah, where AQAP struck the Ministry of Interior border post and infiltrated the town, killing several Saudi security personnel

[Abdullah @Abdullahzva0]

From Al-Tanwir li-Ba'd Masa'il al-Takfir, by Shaykh Xassan Xuseen.

[Abdullah @Abdullahzva0]

Is the Najdi position based upon Mutazilite thought?

[Abdullah @Abdullahzva0]

Did the Imams of the Najdi Dawah believe in the excuse of ignorance?

[Abdullah @Abdullahzva0]

to take before the call to Islam is received. Furthermore, the denial of declaring him an unbeliever does not imply judging him as a believer. At most, it postpones worldly punishment until the call to Islam reaches him, and is not in regards to the akhirah.

[Abdullah @Abdullahzva0]

@LevantAffair2 @Lnarity Jabhat al-Nusrah didn’t have an issue with taking from him 10 years ago. What changed?

[Abdullah @Abdullahzva0]

So the Najdi Dawah differentiated between the title of mushrik and the title of kaafir, and saw the doer of shirk as a mushrik who has left Islam, but could not be killed, until proof was established. When that occurred, he either repents, or is killed as a disbeliever.

[Abdullah @Abdullahzva0]

Did the Imams of the Najdi Dawah believe in the excuse of ignorance?

[AscendedShin al Zouhayri @ZouhairsMurid]

MIAW opposes his own da'wah when he excuses those who excused polytheism prior to his coming due to lack of proof

[Abdullah @Abdullahzva0]

constitutes disbelief that permits the taking of his life and property, even though we do not pass judgment on this person because the proof has not been established against him.”
Source: Al-Rasa’il wa al-Masa’il al-Najdiyya (5/576)

[Abdullah @Abdullahzva0]

@Milat_at_Tawhid @EbnHussein1424 Just go through this well-made thread on the issue. May Allah bless the brother who compiled it:

[Ibrāhīm Ibn Maḥmūd @ibmsulaymani]

🧵 𝐀 𝐭𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐨𝐟 𝐦𝐲 𝐩𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐃𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐞𝐥 𝐇𝐚𝐪𝐢𝐪𝐚𝐭𝐣𝐨𝐮

[Abdullah @Abdullahzva0]

@Milat_at_Tawhid @EbnHussein1424 He believes both. He also said Khoimeini was not upon kufr, but Ibn Taymiyyah was.