Rahi Meer

[Rahi Meer @AbidQayoom412]

@SB2weets @akm1441 geopolitics ka asar hai🙃

[Rahi Meer @AbidQayoom412]

@mohinimaheshwa hub

[Rahi Meer @AbidQayoom412]

@Optimistic399 better work than promoting and supporting Shit like jdf....

[Abd alhade alani @abdalhadealani]

This Syrian old man hid his private library in his home in the city of Damascus since the end of 2011 before escaping to Kuwait out of fear of the Assad regime, where the mere presence of a banned book could lead you to Assad's gulag and death under torture.

Today, the uncle returned to his library and completely removed the wall behind which he had hidden it, revealing valuable books that the Assad regime prohibited possessing and circulating.

[Akhtar Hussain @AkhtarH15638653]

Full mizahiya VDO
Mazay na Aya to pesay wapis
Aur sab say harri bat
Bleeps and blunders
Yeh koi ni dikhata

[Rahi Meer @AbidQayoom412]

@koh_qaf Thank God for the blessings!! Indeed this is a blessing...

[Rahi Meer @AbidQayoom412]

@koh_qaf 🤣

[Rahi Meer @AbidQayoom412]

@koh_qaf meh zan tund fehraaan

[Rahi Meer @AbidQayoom412]

@koh_qaf buzragi hend assaaar chu zahir gomut..

[Rahi Meer @AbidQayoom412]

@IltijaMufti_ bdw ur transliteration is incorrect

[Rahi Meer @AbidQayoom412]

Logic🤣

[بب @ahadsoab]

O Wahabis how much more injustice will you do towards your own blood?

[Rahi Meer @AbidQayoom412]

@aamiralkashmiri Eid Mubarak

[Rahi Meer @AbidQayoom412]

@JobFound5 interested

[Jamaat-e-Islami Hind @JIHMarkaz]

Supreme Court Interim Order on Waqf Amendment Act: Executive Overreach Curtailed, Final Relief Awaited

New Delhi: Jamaat-e-Islami Hind President Syed Sadatullah Husaini issued a statement on the Supreme Court’s interim order on the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, saying the order has exposed major constitutional flaws in the Act and curbed some of the government’s most arbitrary provisions. The community appreciates the interim protections granted, particularly against executive interference in Waqf properties and the suspension of impractical conditions such as the five-year Islam requirement. At the same time, key concerns remain unaddressed, especially the abolition of Waqf by user. Jamaat-e-Islami Hind expressed confidence that these issues will be corrected in the final judgment and reaffirmed its resolve to continue the legal and democratic struggle until full justice is secured.
Mr. Husaini said: “The Court has struck down the sweeping powers earlier vested in Collectors and Designated Officers to unilaterally treat Waqf properties as government land even before judicial determination. This confirms our stand that the Act attempted to give the executive powers which belong to the judiciary, violating the basic constitutional principle of separation of powers. The Court’s order is a clear rebuke to this attempt at undue interference in Waqf management and a validation of the community’s concerns.”
On the clause that required a person to prove five years of Islamic practice before being allowed to create a Waqf, the JIH President stated: “The stay of this provision again upholds our position. We had consistently argued that it was discriminatory, arbitrary and impractical. The Court’s intervention demonstrates that such unconstitutional clauses cannot withstand judicial scrutiny. We now expect that the final order will strike it down completely.”
On the issue of ongoing disputes, Mr. Husaini said: “The Court has restrained the authorities from altering revenue records or derecognising Waqf properties during the pendency of disputes. This prevents arbitrary dispossession and protects the constitutional right of minorities to manage their endowments until a competent court or Tribunal gives a final verdict. This again validates our position that the government was seeking to bypass due process.”
However, Jamaat-e-Islami Hind noted that several serious issues remain to be addressed in the final hearing. Mr. Husaini remarked: “The provision abolishing Waqf by user continues to endanger thousands of historic mosques, graveyards and Eidgahs which were established and maintained for centuries without formal deeds. We have always maintained that this principle is essential in a country like India, where countless religious institutions of all communities exist without documentation. We hope that the Court will uphold this in the final order.”
He also pointed to the impracticality of the short deadline for registration of all Waqfs under the new Act: “Such a requirement is unrealistic in a vast country like India where many institutions are old, rural, and undocumented. To impose an unworkable time-bound registration will only open the door for harassment and large-scale exclusion of genuine Waqfs. This concern must be remedied in the final judgment.”
On the Court’s interim restriction of non-Muslim membership in Waqf institutions, Mr. Husaini said: “Ensuring Muslim majority in Waqf Boards and the Central Waqf Council is important, but the very logic behind non-Muslim membership is flawed. The claim that administrative efficiency or state oversight cannot be ensured by Muslim members themselves is unjustified and discriminatory. To impose non-Muslim members in a religious endowment body implies mistrust of the community and is a form of intrusion. Such measures are not applied to the institutions of other religious communities, and therefore this provision remains unacceptable.”
The statement concluded by reiterating that this is only an interim order and the legal battle is far from over. “The order proves that the Waqf Amendment Act, 2025, suffers from serious constitutional flaws. Some of them have already been exposed by this judgment, and others will, we believe, be addressed in the final hearing. Jamaat-e-Islami Hind, together with other organisations, will continue its legal and democratic struggle until this unconstitutional law is fully overturned. We once again urge the government to immediately withdraw the Act in light of constitutional principles and community concerns.”

#SupremeCourtofIndia #सुप्रीमकोर्ट #WaqfBoard

[Rahi Meer @AbidQayoom412]

@malika_rushda please allow me to use non parliamentarian language....

[Shashi Tharoor @ShashiTharoor]

This may have registered as barely a blip on most Indian minds, but it is a worrying portent of things to come. There is an increasing sense of frustration in Bangladesh with both major parties — the (now banned) Awami League and the Bangladesh National Party. Those who wish “a plague on both your houses” are increasingly turning to the Jamaat-e-Islami, not because these voters are zealots or Islamist fundamentalists, but because the JeI are not tainted by the corruption and misgovernance associated, rightly or wrongly, with the two mainstream parties. How will this play out in the Feb 2026 general elections? Will New Delhi be dealing with a Jamaat majority next door?

[Rahi Meer @AbidQayoom412]

@malika_rushda hmm, same here in bla

[Rahi Meer @AbidQayoom412]

Sensible....

[The Kashmiriyat @TheKashmiriyat]

“Floods in Kashmir aren’t just about morality," says Moulana Ramiz Qadri at Jamia Masjid Anantnag.

They stem from our disrespect of Allah’s blessings, cutting trees, concreting grasslands, choking rivers with waste. Qur’an & Hadith warn such actions invite disaster.

[Rahi Meer @AbidQayoom412]

@koh_qaf sub titles mat mile Bangladesh k ijtima k

[شھزاد @amjadshahzad78]

موت کو نظرانداز کرتے ہوئے

مولانا مودودی رحمہ اللہ لاہور میں نہیں رکے۔
مولانا ناظمی پلٹن میں نہیں رکے۔
ڈاکٹر شفیق الرحمن سهروردی ادھیان میں نہیں رکے۔
یہ سب ہمارے لیے اللہ کی طرف سے نعمت ہیں