Abū Muslim

[الشيخ عباس الجونة @abbasaljawnah]

🔖 فاسألوا أهل الذكر إن كنتم لا تعلمون

إن أمر الفتن تتعلق بـ قال الله وقال الرسول عليه الصلاة والسلام وتتعلق بالحقائق، فإذا لم يكن الإنسان عنده علم ... فننصحه أن ينأى بنفسه ويقبل على ما ينفعه ... فالله عز وجل أحال هذه الأمور فيما يتعلق بالفتن على أهل العلم في قوله سبحانه وتعالى: (فاسألوا أهل الذكر إن كنتم لا تعلمون).

🪶 الشيخ عباس الجونة حفظه الله

#الفتن #العلماء #عباس_الجونة

[عرفات بن حسن المحمدي @Arafatbinhassan]

[صلاة الكسوف تصلى جماعة وتصلى فرادى بالاتفاق]

اتفق العلماء على أنه يستحب صلاة الكسوف في جماعة، وأنها تصلى فرادى كما تصلى جماعة.

انظر:
التمهيد ٢٣٨/١٤
إكمال المعلم ٣٣٠/٣
الإفصاح لابن هبيرة ١٣٤/١
بداية المجتهد ٢٢٠/١
رحمة الأمة ص٨٢
البناية للعيني ١٥٠/٣
فتح القدير لابن الهمام ٨٤/٢

[Ar-risaalah Publications @ArrisaalahPubs]

📘 NEW PDF

📄 Refuting the False Claims of al-Hudhaifī and Abū Iyāḍ and Exposing Their Inconsistencies

🖊️ Written by: Abū Kawthar Lukmān bn Abdir-Raūf

ʿAlī al-Hudhaifī, Abū Iyāḍ, and Bilāl as-Sālimī have all made statements concerning the scholarly standing of Shaykh ʿAbdullāh al-Bukhārī. Yet Bilāl previously described him as one of the foremost scholars of al-Jarḥ wa al-Taʿdīl and among the most prominent representatives of the field, whereas today his scholarly standing is being denied and undermined.

➤ Their own statements expose the contradiction.

📎 https://t.co/rlINPaEE5l

[Ar-risaalah Publications @ArrisaalahPubs]

Hijri Date

Yawm al-Ithnayn 26th Safar, 1448AH

(Monday, 10th of August, 2026)

In accordance with the counting of the Sultan

🖊 Ar-Risaalah Publications
https://t.co/3wv93pwGrd

[Ar-risaalah Publications @ArrisaalahPubs]

Inactive in Truth, Energized in Falsehood

Al-'Allamah 'Abdullah Al-Bukhārī حفظه الله

[Abu Affān Al-Marzuuq NGR @UthMarzuq]

ما أصدقكم يا شيخنا!

[عرفات بن حسن المحمدي @Arafatbinhassan]

[وسطية طريقة علمائنا الكبار في الحافظين النووي وابن حجر بين غلاة الحدادية وغلاة المميعة والجُهّال وأنهما عالمان في السنة والفقه ولكنهما في باب العقيدة عندهما أخطاء على طريقة شيوخ الأشاعرة]

https://t.co/mLQSMRQcHj

[Ar-risaalah Publications @ArrisaalahPubs]

Knowledge that nurtures the heart and corrects the worship (بِإِذْنِ ٱللَّٰهِ) 📖

Join us at Aaishah’s Academy, an online learning space dedicated to teaching authentic Islamic knowledge upon clarity and understanding.
We offer lessons in: • Qur’an, Hadīth, Tawḥeed, Fiqh and Arabiyyah

✨ Open to children and adults
✨ Classes available for both males and females.

Take a step toward learning your Deen correctly.

📩 Enroll now:
Male: https://t.co/uy5aqUtXep
Female: https://t.co/5SFtMx5UP4

[Ar-risaalah Publications @ArrisaalahPubs]

📘 NEW PDF

The Traits & Tendencies of the
Defenders & Followers of Amjad
Rafiq (Abu Iyaad of Salafi
Publications)

The Fitnah of Amjad Rafiq has exposed and highlighted the realities and traits of his blind followers and defenders, which expose that they are not upon the truth, nor upon evidence and clarity. They are just a bunch of yes-men and bootlickers who utilize several intimidation tactics to silence those who refute their leader and expose his misguidance

🖊️ Abū Anwar An-Naijīriyy

🔗 https://t.co/Un86EWliVE

[أبو العباس عبد الكبير بن إبراهيم الطاوسي @Arabicmade88127]

When you have to use falsehood, tricks, plots to defend what you are upon, it is a clear sign you are upon falsehood. No matter how much you plot for the people of truth it comes back to you

ولا يحيق المكر السيئ إلا بأهله

[Ar-risaalah Publications @ArrisaalahPubs]

📹 NEW VIDEO

⚠️ Refuting the Deceptive Claim of "Returning to the Quran" to Evade the Scholars | Sh. Fuad Az-Zintānĩ

Download here:
https://t.co/JV3d4L9Kff

📡 Follow the “Gatherings of Knowledge” on https://t.co/ESDkwIaCVC

━───✨✦📚✦✨───━

[أبو العباس عبد الكبير بن إبراهيم الطاوسي @Arabicmade88127]

@ArrisaalahPubs @AbdullahJallow9 we were with Fawwaaz for knowledge purposes, they are with Fawwaaz for fitna purposes, we accepted Fawwāz when he was in line with scholars, they are with fawwaaz when he opposed scholars. Wallaahi this is misguidance, Allaahul musta'aan.

[Taofeeq Olanrewaju @Taofeeq04]

I am always amazed with the thinking of the followers of Abu Iyād and their comprehension abilities. The fact that he has not seen any authentic narration establishing his tabdī does not negate the fact that Abu Iyād has opposed many salafi principles and invented new ones.

[الشيخ عباس الجونة @abbasaljawnah]

🔴 كلمة مـاتـــــــــعـــة 🔴
ـــــــــــــــــــــــ 🟡 ـــــــــــــــــــــــ

#كلمة
💬 بعنوان: نعمة المساجد

🎙 للشيخ الفاضل |
أبي عمار #عباس_الجونة

🖥 الجمعة، ١٧ صفر ١٤٤٨ هـ

📍 مسجد الخير - أمصرة - أبين.

اسمع كلمة الشيخ هنا 👇

[الشيخ عباس الجونة @abbasaljawnah]

إذا اضطرب الناس في زمن الفتن... فما طريق النجاة؟

#كلمة
💬 بعنوان: لزوم غرز العلماء من أسباب النجاة من الفتن

🎙 للشيخ الفاضل |
أبي عمار #عباس_الجونة حفظه الله

🔖 مشاركة هاتفية في دورة الإمام سفيان الثوري الثانية
المقامة في عدة المدينة في بريطانيا

ــــــــــــــــــ ✿🌸✿ ــــــــــــــــــ

[عرفات بن حسن المحمدي @Arafatbinhassan]

[من صفات الصادقين]

قال الحافظ الذهبي رحمه الله:

«الصَّادِقِ أَنْ يُقِلَّ من:

الكلاَمِ

وَالأَكلِ

وَالنَّومِ

وَالمُخَالَطَةِ،

وَيُكثِرَ مِنَ:

الأَورَادِ

وَالتَّوَاضُعِ،

وَذِكْرَ المَوْتِ،

وَقَوْلِ لاَ حَوْلَ وَلاَ قُوَّةَ إِلاَّ بِاللهِ».

سير أعلام النبلاء ٥٣٤/١٤

[Ar-risaalah Publications @ArrisaalahPubs]

📘 NEW PDF

Fawwāz al-Madkhalī Clarifies the Error of Their Kurdish Group and Their Misunderstanding of the Ḥadīth of Dhāt Anwāṭ

Written by: Shaykh ʿAbdul-Bāsiṭ al-Mashhadānī (May Allah preserve him)

➤ Translated by: Lukmān bn Abdir-Raūf

📎 https://t.co/LNHqI84766

Abū Iyāḍ, while defending Dānā ʿAbd Allāh, accused Shaykh ʿArafāt al-Muḥammadī of misrepresenting the issue of Dhāt Anwāṭ. However, Fawwāz al-Madkhalī—whom they consider one of their scholars—stated that their Kurdish group was mistaken and misunderstood the ḥadīth.

Why the inconsistency, either Dānā ʿAbd Allāh was wrong, as Fawwāz said, or he was correct, as Abū Iyāḍ’s defence suggests. If he was wrong, then why is Shaykh ʿArafāt’s criticism of that mistake called “misrepresentation,” “distortion,” or “pseudo-scholarship”?

[Abū Muslim @AbuMuslim2003]

@ArrisaalahPubs Allahu l musta'ān
This Abū 'Iyad has also been the one insulting SHAYKH ABDULLAH AL-BUKHĀRĪ since.
Turning the salafis away from their scholars.

Bringing innovated principles into Salafiyyah without evidence.

Allahu l musta'ān

Then what is he then if not PLANT.

[Ar-risaalah Publications @ArrisaalahPubs]

There is this Manchester-based 50 year old adult yet a "boy", Abdullah Jallow who seems to have no knowledge or skill except to insult and to proudly announce his age at any chance. Oh, and to announce his 25/30 years of following his masters around, with no observable traces of knowledge nor any respect for the people of knowledge except his masters.

​I have realized that this individual mistakes the way noble people ignore his unruly behavior and sharp tongue as him presenting "evidence" and "harsh truths." But no! It is merely prattling, babbling, and a display of his lack of religious knowledge and basic common sense.

​Regarding your question: "Where is the evidence for the Tabdee' against Abu 'Iyād?"

​Firstly, I haven't seen any authentic chain of transmission clearly stating that Sh. 'Arafāt declared him to be an innovator.

​Secondly, even if it is established that he was truly declared an innovator, why is it such a big deal? When a person opposes the foundational beliefs of Ahl as-Sunnah, he is declared a mubtadi'.

​Or are you unaware that Abu 'Iyād claimed that disputes between duaat should not be referred back to the scholars? Even after people of knowledge corrected him, he remained stubbornly devoted to this false principle and continued to defend it!

​Moreover, if we are talking about false tabdī', is there anyone more guilty of it than you and your ilk? Nizār branded everyone who does not support his transgressions as "Hizb Jadeed" and has repeated this several times. Do you care to ask him for his evidence for that?

​He branded Sh. Salāh Kantūsh a Hizbī and Shaykh Ahmad Bādukhūn a Haddādi. Where is his evidence for this tabdī'?

​Fawwāz al-Madkhali branded everyone who does not follow them as "Sūfiyyatul Bukhāri." What was his evidence for that?

​The uncaptured thief is now trying to arrest the farmer. You and your ilk are the ones who have branded Salafis with false tabdī' countless times, yet you still shed crocodile tears to present yourselves as the victims. Mr. Jallow, fear Allah.

​The description of him being a "plant" is highly fitting for anyone who divides the Muslims and tries to turn them away from their scholars, just as Abu 'Iyād is doing. A person who divides the Salafis because his ego prevents him from retracting an error he was refuted for is surely a plant of Shaytān!

​Lastly, 'Ali Al-Hudhayfi and Abu 'Iyād have been falsely branding Sh. 'Arafāt a "plant" for a while now- why didn't we see all this crying from you then?

​If you continue to disrespect those who are teaching and defending the Deen of Allah, the people of Sunnah will not stand by and let you cause mischief on the earth.

​Mubārak Ismail