We are looking into doing a recission for investors, meaning those with tokens who didn't sell will be able to swap them for the ethereum they used to purchase the token.
We are looking into doing a recission for investors, meaning those with tokens who didn't sell will be able to swap them for the ethereum they used to purchase the token.
We are looking into doing a recission for investors, meaning those with tokens who didn't sell will be able to swap them for the ethereum they used to purchase the token.
4/4 Minus ~$70-100k+ investment (liquidity, contract/web devs, etc). They could've profited FAR more if the token launched successfully! The truth is their was an issue with the contract by Solidity Finance, ppl couldn't sell, then bots dumped. Liquidity untouched. Not a scam!
3/4 Sure, they could've hired someone to do it but even so & assuming all those trxs and wallets were linked, it's doubtful 2 successful influencers would ruin their reputations & source of income on an exit scam to split ~$550k...
2/4 The large synchronized sells were bots clearly engaged by pro full-time bot traders, evident by their wallet history. Some paid $1k+ in miner fees per trx to frontrun. Crypto influencers lack the time/knowledge/experience to be able to bot trade like this...
1/4 Suspicions of @AcceptCryptos being a scam are unfounded. I've conducted a deep analysis of the transaction data, INCLUDING ALL ASSOCIATED WALLETS that dumped, analyzing each individually! ...
@MattWallace888@MYLESGINVEST#AcceptCrypto $ACEPT
This was not a rug pull or a scam. Liquidity was never taken out or touched, and there is approximately 600k USD inside of this project between marketing/dev taxes, the liquidity pool, and liquidity. No tokens owned or distributed for the token's purposes have been sold either.