Women initiate 70% of divorces.
Men are a bit stressed in boss-wife situations, but it is women who generally demand dominant, successful partners and who end most of these marriages.
Intentionally depriving a child of her own mother is one of the most depraved things imaginable. The entire surrogacy industry should be forcibly shut down. It is pure barbarism.
Unfortunately, this has the foundation upside down.
Natural rights, private property, and free enterprise are the roots from which speech, consent, and limited government all grow.
James Madison was direct in that government is instituted to protect property of every sort.
The founding was about securing what belongs to the individual by nature.
Murray Rothbard documented that the American Revolution was a revolt in defense of natural rights to life, liberty, and property.
Government existed only to protect those rights, not to create or redistribute them. “Liberty and Property” was the unifying cry.
Ayn Rand cut to the core in “Man’s Rights”: “the right to life is the source of all rights and the right to property is their only implementation. Without property rights, no other rights are possible.”
Free speech requires property in your mind, voice, and means of expression.
Free enterprise is voluntary exchange built on the same foundation.
Remove secure property and both collapse into state permission.
Checks and balances, consent of the governed, and equality under law are tools to secure natural rights, not independent ends.
When a nation ranks the roots last, it treats derived “freedoms” as gifts from power, which explains a lot about where we are.
Spoiler alert - they all left their husbands and there was no physical or sexual abuse in their marriage. Even in their curated tradwife horror stories they couldn't find women who had been abandoned or abused.
Men and women are treated differently in court.
"Research consistently shows that men are treated more harshly than women in the criminal justice system: They receive longer sentences for the same crime, even taking into account factors such as criminal history, type of offence, seriousness of offence, marital status, and childcare responsibilities.
Interestingly, male judges are more likely than female ones to go easy on female defendants." — @SteveStuWill via @robkhenderson
Children can often adapt to hardship. What they struggle with is extreme unpredictability.
One reason childhood instability can be more damaging than poverty is that it's an evolutionarily novel stressor that children's brains aren't equipped to handle.
Poverty has long been the default in human societies.
But being raised by a shifting cast of caretakers, many of whom disappear from your life, is not. Children require stable attachments to develop properly. Without them, things go wrong.
In my work I have to constantly reiterate that intelligence is no protection against indoctrination. Most people who have objected to Left policies over the past five years or so think the left has gone "too far". They don't recognize that left ideology is fundamentally rotten at its core, and if you don't want the ongoing disasters you have to reject it all.
Tough, I know.
I'm a social psychologist. We study how to influence, persuade and indoctrinate. We understand those early seeds, those foot-in-the-door moves demanded by left progressives, are not ends in themselves. They're designed to soften the ground for the more extreme demands that will follow. They give the target time to adapt, rationalize, develop willful blindness and ultimately comply to whatever is requested.
“People with manipulative, narcissistic, or psychopathic tendencies sometimes weaponize victimhood: They exaggerate harm, fabricate grievances, and leverage sympathy to exploit other people’s better nature.”
https://t.co/F4bTXnnZtx
I have a great idea…
Red states get all the Elon Musk types the left hates so much…
Blue states get all the illegal immigrants committing felonies they love so much!
Win/Win!!
When female participation has reached equal or greater than 50%, name a single time feminism has dialled back their gynocentric and deeply bias advocacy…?
Why is the answer “never”?
Because feminism has never been about equality
A lot of women don’t like that men are waking up.
Men are done chasing women and calling it purpose.
For too long, men were told their highest calling was to provide and protect for a woman, as if her approval was the finish line.
Wrong.
A man’s purpose comes first. His mission comes first. His relationship with God, his body, his money, his discipline, his legacy first.
If men want to win, they have to take pussy off the pedestal and put purpose back where it belongs.
Women scream for equality when it benefits them.
But suddenly go silent when it requires real sacrifice.
Their version of equality is complete one-sided.