reminder nerd culture was entirely made up of male fantasy content.
It was never "sexist" it was just male centric.
Its like saying Kpop is sexist against men because their content is more woman focused.
@ChristianWifeMo And they're casually ignoring how there's been reports on women who were still sexually assault by trans women in bathrooms. They don't bat an eye.
You're right. But at the same time, game devs and companies still resort to listen to activists and minorities who don't even play their game.
They would rather not be called a "sexist, homophobic, or racist" by listening to those braindead activists rather than ignoring/gatekeeping them.
@AJelifar9085 The same people who are policing the Vtuber space are also policing the furry space. If you want it to be a positive and caring space, gatekeep the bad apples.
@AI_EmeraldApple I fully agree with you with how they use THAT website in particular as a Trojan Horse to fully condone and censor almost every "problematic" websites and use this website as an example which is a terrible comparison.
@danhengposting 🩵 I wish you the best of luck to save Stellar Jades, you stupid dragon. :p ❤️
Not sure if you like leaks or anything so I don't want to even say it out of respect for any HSR players.
I think the people who should rightfully feel unsafe are kids because the TQ+ people even admitted that they are coming for your kids to groom them to become trans and/or drag queen.
How and why do THOSE people get to say they feel unsafe when they're the ones making kids feel unsafe?
Disgusting.
KOSA (Kids Online & Safety Act) is a Trojan Horse for Worldwide Government Surveillance. Our privacy, our freedom of artistic expression, our freedom of speech, and more importantly, our information is at risk if we let this law pass.
It was never "for the kids" and it will never be because of old farts of our politicians, senates, and governors are too stupid enough to realize that they're letting/condoning big techs like Meta, Google, and Apple wanted to make selling our data without our consent (that includes kids too) become legal.
Your information can be sold through the Dark Web once your private data has been breached and companies could give less than a fuck with what happens to you cause they already made money off of you anyway.
🩵This law must not pass.❤️
I would like to clarify this point, as it is easily confused with the credit card issues linked to content regulation. This situation is most likely arising because banks are exercising caution regarding overseas remittances as a risk-mitigation measure against money laundering. Therefore, rather than bashing the banks, what is needed is for us to voice our desire to continue playing Japanese titles on Steam—including from outside Japan—and to urge the Financial Services Agency (a Japanese government body) to take action on these issues.
@fwprism I mean have you not seen how many Greek Statues of voluptuous women and muscular men?
I know it don't mean much but at the same time, there's women to this day who are trying to achieve the same body as those statues as they believe all men like women with an hourglass body.
Currently people are contacting Visa and Mastercard, en-masse, in an effort to get them to explain why they are banning legal content from being transacted through their systems. These arbitrary restrictions caused companies, such as Steam, https://t.co/p8izycqtcO, and others to pull violent and adult video games from their platforms. They continue to remain silent on the reason WHY they enforced the restrictions on the companies. I surmise they are gagged from speaking through likely threat of regulatory pressure.
May I introduce, Russ Vought, a co-writer for Project 2025, Director of the United States Office of Management and Budget, AND Acting Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
https://t.co/J3SY1jSNkD
This man has already publicly stated his desire to have pornographic content, violent video games, and other types of content "harmful to children", banned from the internet. This claim he makes is not based on unbiased scientific testing.
In a two minute clip posted on YouTube by The Intercept the following transcript, highlighted in yellow, shows his intended starting point (start with children), and then he cuts himself off from explaining the next part of the plan, of violent video games, etc, as that route had failed twice already in the past few decades.
https://t.co/LrJF6zoZrQ
https://t.co/doR1ZReN4F
https://t.co/cNZEVTahd7
Now, as his position in the CFPB, he has ultimate authority over payment providers and banks, and he has likely been abusing this power to strong-arm changes in these privately owned businesses regarding content he specifically had shown his distaste and hatred towards previously. All clearly telegraphed before hand, many years ago.
This was ALL done in the guise of protecting the children. Admittedly, it is a very solid tactic, at the core. But, if you use the mantra of protecting the children, it tends to mean that it's just a ploy, usually to further a specific agenda.
They are a threat against the United States, nay, the entire world. They are a threat against our democracy, a threat against free speech, and a threat against gamers, a threat against media in general.
These are the same people who believe violent video games cause violent things. An entire generation of individuals have been playing Grand Theft Auto, playing Doom, Quake, and other games, but we are not currently, nor will we face a worldwide pandemic of armed car robberies, driving on sidewalks for the fun of it, or people running around with sawed off shotguns killing demons, or raping people, because a video game was made exploring the content.
Those in power have been eroding free speech in the law. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) provides immunity to online platforms from liability for content posted by their users. They are actively attempting to kill this protection to further their goals outlined in Project 2025, by passing liabilities of their userbase onto the operators via financial regulation threats and pressure, thus killing speech directly, while still keeping in the shadows publicly.
"He filmed the crimes and posted monetized rape videos on P*rnhub, earning revenue for him and the site owners."
https://t.co/b00YlsVtX7
This is their attempt to kill section 230 immunity.
You should not be frightened that they MAY come into power, they are ALREADY IN POWER. They are exercising it spectacularly, taking baby steps to erode away your speech, and we've all been asleep at the wheel.
@CollectiveShout You never cared about women at all. You only cared about pushing your agenda. No wonder no one takes you seriously any more. You're all bunch of hags.